by Dr. Christine Born//
You may think what you want about the AfD (Alternative for Germany), but you have to recognize that it is committed to coming to terms with the corona years, including in the Corona Investigation Committee in the Brandenburg state parliament. And it was the only party in Germany to critically question the government's corona policy at an early stage. It would be desirable if the other parties could at least now promote a fact-based review. Citizens have many burning questions about coronavirus, as was evident in the question and answer sessions at the AfD parliamentary group's second coronavirus symposium on November 11 and 12, 2023 in the German Bundestag.
The risky vaccination program continues
Corona is not over - was the conclusion reached by many speakers: according to Prof. Dr. Andreas Sönnichsen, although there was never an epidemic situation of national significance during the "corona years", a vaccine was still being used that was highly risky. The effectiveness and safety of the vaccines were completely unknown at the beginning of the massive vaccination campaign. How were doctors and politicians able to promote the vaccine as safe and effective under these circumstances? To this day, vaccination against corona is still being continued, although according to the experts present, it should be stopped immediately due to side effects, deaths and various toxic ingredients in the ampoules. Vaccination is still compulsory in the German Armed Forces. Masks are still being sold as effective, although there is still no study that proves their effectiveness.
Do fundamental rights apply differently in the pandemic?
Legal proceedings are also still ongoing, for example against doctors such as Dr. Ronald Weikl, who is accused of issuing mask certificates for children with respiratory distress. Doctors who have remained true to the Hippocratic oath are also still in custody. Criminologist Björn Lars Oberndorf suspects "pre-trial detention for political reasons", as in the case of Dr. Heinrich Habig.
Critical scientists are being persecuted, including the microbiologist Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi and the immunologist and toxicologist Prof. Dr. Stefan Hockertz, who was connected via video for his lecture because he is being threatened in Germany. House searches, such as those experienced by Dr. Walter Weber, a specialist in internal medicine from Hamburg, have become part of the everyday experience of doctors, scientists and respectable citizens who have dared to express criticism of corona policy. Lawyer Dr. Josef Hingerl also referred to the alarming state of the legal system, classifying the conviction of Judge Christian Dettmar from Weimar as a "shot in the arm for the judiciary" that would have influenced all judges.
Review and outlook
Martin Sichert, Member of Parliament and health policy spokesperson for the AfD parliamentary group, welcomed speakers from the fields of law, medicine, data analysis and media as well as the victims of the measures and the numerous guests. He invited the audience to look back on the corona years and to look ahead to the events currently unfolding. Dr. Gerd Reuther, a medical historian, went back into the history of the epidemic narrative and showed that even in earlier centuries, the fight against epidemics was more dangerous than effective and that even then a great deal of fear was spread - fear as a vehicle for undesirable measures.
Epidemics had already had social functions in the past. The aim was to drive forward social restructuring, launch new large-scale projects and reduce the population.
The magic formula of overloading the healthcare system is invalid
Data analyst Tom Lausen made it clear that the "magic formula of overloading the healthcare system", which the government had used to scare people in 2021, was still being used in court today. Even the 2021 Ärzteblatt headlined: "COVID-19 pandemic: historically low bed utilization."
Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg also addressed the low hospital occupancy rate and stated: "After the start of vaccination in 2021, the number of deaths increased significantly." A responsible government would not drive its population into such a panic and would not issue shock papers, but would instead focus on calming the situation.
No longer trivialize vaccine damage as Long Covid
Prof. Dr. Walter Lang, together with other pathologists, including Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt, who died in May 2023, performed 88 autopsies in Europe and examined 75 tissue samples from vaccine-injured patients. A link to the vaccination was identified in around two thirds of the examinations. He called for the COVID-19 vaccination to always be taken into account in pathological examinations and for corresponding signs to be looked for. Lang referred to the statements of oncologists who had observed the connection between the development or recurrence of cancer and vaccination. He concluded his presentation with: "Vaccine damage must no longer be trivialized as Long Covid." Prof. Dr. Paul Cullen, a specialist in internal and laboratory medicine, stated that around 60 percent of positive PCR tests were basically irrelevant to the national incidence of disease. The CT value had been set far too high. This would have inflated the number of cases in order to spread fear.
The consequential damage caused by the coronavirus policy cannot yet be measured
The extent of the damage caused by the entire corona regime cannot yet be assessed, Tom Lausen pointed out, and Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi also regretted the lack of data, but urged an immediate stop to the so-called vaccination on the basis of the results already available. Bhakdi, an early critic, author and wise advisor, received a standing ovation as he walked to the speaker's table. But the other speakers, such as family doctor and author Dr. Gunter Frank, were not neglected either. Frank described the lockdown as the most unsustainable thing you could ever do. He called the entire coronavirus handling a crime. The lockdown had triggered a humanitarian catastrophe. The vaccine was, as Dr. David E. Martin said, "a shelf warmer from bioweapons research."
The audience was disciplined, attentive and applauded enthusiastically. Social decline, illness, inadequate medical care and unanswered questions in connection with coronavirus are depressing people. This was heard from vaccination victims, people from the care sector and the German Armed Forces, who were interviewed in a panel by Dr. Christina Baum, Member of Parliament for the AfD and member of the Health Committee.
And the swearers were right after all
The psychoneuroimmunologist Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Schubert from the University of Innsbruck, the general practitioner Dr. Maria Hubmer-Mogg and the member of parliament and author Gerald Hauser (FPÖ) came to the symposium from Austria. Maria Hubmer-Mogg commented on the corona pandemic and described how even the very youngest children were affected by the measures. Christian Schubert spoke of a loss of life for children due to the corona measures. In his presentation, Gerald Hauser discussed the preparation of the "pandemic" through simulation games, a fact that was confirmed to him in writing by Austrian Interior Minister Gerhard Karner. In addition, on Sunday, March 15, 2020, over a hundred amendments to the law were rushed through in a National Council meeting convened at short notice. When were these complex rewordings of the laws made? "Before the coronavirus outbreak. They must have already been ready in the drawer," says Hauser. The MP's questions about the Great Reset were later criticized by the other parliamentary groups in the National Council. He would endanger democracy with his questions. They even wanted to revoke his right to ask questions. - Several politicians warned of the erosion of parliamentarianism during the Corona Symposium in Berlin. Too often, decisions are made over the heads of parliamentarians.
The WHO as a pandemic command center?
Philipp Kruse, lawyer from Switzerland, Uwe Kranz, former President of the Thuringia State Office of Criminal Investigation, and Dr. Rainer Rothfuß MdB, member of the European Union Committee, spoke about the planned changes to the WHO statutes. Kruse said that the aim of the changes was to increase vaccination rates. There would be no possibility of correction once the WHO had taken action. The WHO has also not yet shown any critical self-reflection with regard to corona management, has not dared to look back and has not presented any evaluation reports. With the "adaptation" of the International Health Regulations, the discretionary powers of the WHO Secretary-General would be extended, the WHO's regulations would become binding, the WHO would have a monopoly on information, there would be no control or correction mechanisms, fundamental rights would no longer be protected, and the principle of "audiatur et altera pars" would be eliminated. Fundamental elements of the constitution could therefore be abolished. The relationship of trust between doctor and patient would be disrupted or no longer exist at all. Uwe Kranz pointed out that eleven of the 17 sustainability goals of the 2030 Agenda can only be achieved through vaccination.
For him, the fine declarations on the sustainability goals tend to be "empty words". What is desired is power over a society that is organized like a "digital gulag". Pharmacologist Dr. Michael Yeadon, who joined us via video, also warned against such a dystopia. He said it was high time to do something about this totalitarian development.
Where are the leading media?
After communication scientist Prof. Dr. Michael Meyen had established a clear pact between the media and the federal government - via appointments to posts and financial contributions - journalist Boris Reitschuster asked the plenary session the appropriate question: "Where are the media?" The Berliner Zeitung was on site and was recognized for this, the other mainstream media were probably "too expensive to travel". A big thank you went to the independent media, which once again scored points at the Corona Symposium in Berlin.
About the author of the articleDr. Christine Born, graduate journalist, freelance journalist, member of DJV Stuttgart
English 
German 
Spanish
24 Responses
You write in your article: "Citizens have many burning questions about coronavirus, as was evident in the question and answer sessions at the AfD parliamentary group's second coronavirus symposium on November 11 and 12, 2023 in the German Bundestag. "
I currently have one burning question: Where can I find the contribution by Dr. Michael Yeadon, who also spoke at the 2nd Corona Symposium of the AfD via video link, but which was not published?
Can you send a press inquiry to the AfD about this?
Thank you very much.
I would also have liked an answer to this question.
Is there any information in the meantime as to why Dr. Michael Yeadon's contribution was censored by the AfD?
Despite all the negative facts, despite propaganda, regulations, threats and use of force, over 20% of Germans have - not - been "vaccinated". This fact gives me hope!
Since in "democracy" the media-controlled majority sets the desired tone, the oppressors of free expression will probably have little concern about the relatively small number of people who cannot be counted among them, because in "democracy" the principle still applies: mass instead of class!
And all the more so because "democracy" merely functions as a useful mask for the plutocrats.
Anyone who believes that successful action against the corona dictatorship is possible in view of these structures must unfortunately be called unrealistic and I truly wish that this were not the case, but as we all know, wishful thinking is only possible on the housewife channels of the broadcasters.
Unfortunately, your statement "mass instead of class" is not quite true for other topics (gender, early childhood sex education, LGBT etc.), where the minority has the say - unfortunately
I had been vaccinated twice because I assumed that it would be a classic vaccination. Then came the first protests, and when I looked at the mechanism of action, I immediately realized with horror that the stuff must have an auto-aggressive effect. You don't need any special prior knowledge to know this if you haven't slept through biology lessons and lectures on immunology and genetics. Every doctor, biologist, pharmacist and physiologist should know this. The fact that there are also other aspects - such as incorrect vaccination procedures, contamination by DNA fragments and plasmids, the toxic effect of lipids, sequence changes in m-RNA, toxicity of the antigen itself - does not change the fact that an immune system attacks its own body cells if they produce the antigen to which it is conditioned to attack.
Nothing applies anymore - my truth since March 16, 2020. Respect for scientific work, an independent judiciary, objective reporting and rational politics has almost completely gone down the drain. The role played by the Merkel government is hardly mentioned in the media any more, pandemic mastermind Jens Spahn is hardly mentioned any more (he is allowed to continue his mischief in a different guise), the Drostens and Wielers disappear into oblivion without a sound. Instead, we have installed an ethics council that makes a mockery of its name. The madness of remaining in NGOs such as the UN (and all its sub-organizations), WHO, WEF, WTF, as well as the undemocratic EU, not to mention NATO, is producing cruel blossoms, not unlike a carnivorous plant. I think we really should re-establish national standards and anchor self-thinking and personal responsibility as the highest principle in real life. Think tanks, political foundations, federal and state commissioners for antigypsyism and, and..... must be abolished, administrations must be streamlined, bureaucratic monsters must be reduced, the political apparatus must be significantly downsized and direct citizen participation throughout the federal republic would be desirable. As long as there is no C-reprocessing worthy of the name and which reaches the "center" of the population, I live in a post-fascist time that makes me fear even worse.
I agree with you unreservedly on everything, except that I would strictly reject the call for "federal-wide direct citizen participation" at present. As long as the majority of citizens trust a controlled media apparatus and cannot rely on independent, neutral and balanced reporting, direct citizen participation cannot lead to the desired, rationally controlled voting behavior. First of all, the media landscape must be reformed. This includes the media once again seeing itself as the fourth power in the state, always keeping a critical eye on the other three powers, but especially on the government, and exposing abuses!
I can only fully agree with the "Frank'nfurter" voice. Political education should take the place of stock market news. 10 minutes to eight education for the people. And I am sure that contributions from Arte, Phönix, WDR and NDR offer so much excitement that the topics would NOT be broadcast from 11 p.m. onwards, but that the vast majority would want to find out the whole truth immediately after the "feeding" in the media libraries of the stations...
Even worse, people believed him because he was awarded titles but never practiced as a doctor. He is and remains a farmer's lobbiis. This person has publicly vaccinated children, his ex is ashamed of him and even warns people about this muddlehead!
First the simulation, then the plandemic and now so many people dying and so many stillbirths/abortions. Can they be stopped at all?
One thing is certain, the perpetrators are no longer safe from prosecution. The recent decision of the Federal Constitutional Court on the federal budget shows that there is still a separation of powers. This Senate was obviously not having dinner with the Federal Chancellor, one would think. The rumors surrounding Scholz also suggest that the Cum Ex affair will no longer simply be smiled away due to its sheer monstrosity. Large sections of the judiciary have recognized their own abuse and the Judges' Association is calling for the public prosecutor's offices to be released from their obligation to follow instructions. The risk of criminal sanctions for all too obvious corruption, because ultimately that is what it is all about in almost all areas, is increasing. Formerly highly respected judges, public prosecutors, teachers and doctors have disgraced themselves to the bone as an intellectual elite. The official churches are losing their faithful, who cannot believe that forced vaccinations, fascist discrimination against dissenters, war cries etc. can be in the spirit of Jesus Christ. The extent of the nomenklatura's despair is revealed by ever more open breaches of the constitution, such as the censorship of the media. They lack the arguments, they would lose in an open discourse, their credibility is largely gone - at the latest since the resurgence of the Middle East conflict. There is hope in the countless media professionals who expose themselves to the harsh winds of independence instead of prostituting themselves. Over the past three and a half years, and even before that, they have contributed a great deal to enlightenment and thus played an important role in strengthening our democracy.
And you will see that, despite education, there will be no responsible parties and the citizens will still run to the twentieth gene injection and pick up a sausage because that's just the way humans are. Only 10 - 15 percent of people are able to question and understand these things due to their innate skeptical attitude. Unfortunately, the rest cannot be influenced. And nobody will change this because it has been in our genes since the beginning of mankind. This critical behavior is an ability that makes us both see-throughs and outsiders throughout our lives. That's why I've lost half of my "friends". Who can stand it?
You say something that I didn't want to see clearly until now. I still harbor the hope that by sharing information such as that on which the above article is based, I can persuade people around me to rethink or at least reflect. But it is probably as you say, many are simply unable to comprehend the enormity of what has been done to us in recent years.
I dread to think what else will be done to us in the future just because the majority accept it silently and unchallenged... Our poor children...
What's more, the majority of those who have been given this shot no longer want to see it, even if they still suffer from all kinds of side effects. This admission of having allowed oneself to be deceived in this way, despite the fact that some information was available, with as yet unforeseeable long-term consequences, is something that not many people have, and that in turn is all too human. In this respect, the way in which many were lured into this trap is more than perfidious.
Even if you've lost friends and are forced to talk about some topics in the same way you had to learn in the GDR (I'm an Ossi), you still have one big problem less - you always have to tell yourself that.
You are not alone in this. Other people who have publicly expressed criticism have done the same - even in the "other" direction (i.e. against self-proclaimed experts in coronavirus harmlessness). However, they then strengthened their remaining circle of friends and made new friends. People with serious illnesses or after accidents and their relatives also have the typical experience of losing friends and falling out of social ties - too often without strengthening their remaining friendships or making new ones.
The more vaccination victims there will be ... the fuse of the brew is sometimes long ... the more it will help the party Die Basis as well as the AfD.
This is a sad reason for the influx of votes, but at the same time there was hardly any other opposition to the "vaccination".
A "no" to the further authorization of the W'H'O also only came from the AfD (BT on 12.5.2023, roll-call vote took place at the request of the AfD). These are all facts.
One day, mothers of children who have been vaccinated to death or crippled may drag the heads of those responsible through the streets. Then it will be too late and will no longer make anyone healthy or alive - but I could deeply understand this scene.
So far, the masterminds behind the whole production have "only" messed with the men, at least for the most part. Woe betide the mothers, when the women really stand up. They will do so accompanied by the men (one is writing here right now), but from that level of holy rage and determination, they will set off without us.
From that point on, I wanted to swap places with those responsible even less than ever before. Or with Prof. Bhakdi '... then God have mercy on them'. ~
I would like to point out that the author's comment "And it was the only party in Germany to critically question the government's corona policy at an early stage" is wrong. I would like to remind you that the party "dieBasis" was founded precisely on the basis of its critical position on measures and that leading figures from the ranks of the corona critics stood as candidates for this party in the Bundestag elections.
That is true. However, the base unfortunately only received 3%, around and at, of the votes. The AfD was already a party in the Bundestag back then, that's the difference that I think is meant here
In a post on Twitter (in December 2021), Lauterbach comments on a tweet by Florian Krammer, Professor of Vaccinology. He wrote: "Can you please stop calling the@ vaccine from Novavax an inactivated vaccine? It is a recombinant protein vaccine. The spike protein is produced in moth cells using baculoviruses and then inoculated with matrix M
Adjuvant (a saponin) formulation."
Karl Lauterbach adds: "That's true. ©) But because so many unvaccinated people only want inactivated vaccines, for whatever reason, the Novavax that will soon be available will be labeled as such."
That really says it all!
Yes, about Karl Lauterbach's dishonest statements. And about the intention.
I still wonder why people couldn't recognize that. And still turn on the television today in the unfounded hope of finding out the truth.
My impression is that they are not interested at all.
Unfortunately, these people can no longer be helped. I have tried many times.
Lauterbach also said at the WHO Summit in Berlin in mid-October: "If we don't get the pandemic treaty (the totalitarian overall authorization of the WHO over all of us) done by May next year, we will lose the momentum of the pandemic". I now see this gentleman's appearance (apparently insane and permanently stoned) as an extremely perfect cover. This man is fully responsible for his punishable lying strategies....
Permanently drunk rather - the man is an alcoholic. That's what an experienced doctor friend told us. The statement by this minister of health that he drinks a glass of wine every day fits in with this.