Commentary by Dr. Johanna Weber //
Whether you like the AfD or not, in view of the current events following the elections in Saxony, Thuringia and Brandenburg, you simply can't look away any more. Perhaps the AfD, just like many other homeland-oriented parties in Europe, is simply caring and rather less national socialist. A policy that is connected to the nation opposes global cotroll mechanisms and prioritizes the well-being of one's own country [1]. Against the background of the threat of total globalization with all its negative consequences [2 - 13], it is only understandable that people vote for them; they want national sovereignty and do not want to be at the mercy of unelected NGOs or the super-rich such as George Soros [14 - 32]. Against this backdrop, it is just as understandable that supranational actors want to take action against national parties such as the AfD. But the members of the old parties and their obedient sheep in the population do not see the danger - or perhaps they are simply corrupt because they are intertwined with the economy [44]?
Whatever the reason, it leads to things like the current and, according to some media, absolutely undemocratic behavior [33, 34, 35], where people believe they have to ignore the will of the voters [36] and override laws [37] because they fear that otherwise they will turn the clock back 80 years. Nowhere is an AfD member allowed to be a senior or parliamentary president [37, 38], they are not allowed to sit on the Saxon Broadcasting Council [43], offices to which the AfD is entitled are also withheld from the party in the Bundestag [39], and it is censored in the EU Parliament [40]. The state and federal constitutional courts bought by the old parties are being called upon to prevent this, even though it is not legal at all [41].
If you go along with the agenda of the unelected supranationals without resistance, you don't have to be surprised as an old party if people vote for something else, even if it is nationalist. After all, you are partly to blame for this. The current drama in the state parliaments seems unsustainable from a democratic point of view. Voters want their elected politicians to steer the fate of the state for the good of the country and its citizens, not the globalists or the constitutional judges hoisted into office by the parties that were voted out of office. It would be legally compliant and democratic to take this into account[42].
Sources
[1] https://rumble.com/v5h69er-vp-debate-reaction-as-vance-wallops-walz-iranian-missile-strikes-spark-ww3-.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp at minute 21:00
[2] https://clubderklarenworte.de/fleisch-aus-dem-labor/
[3] https://clubderklarenworte.de/das-brokkoli-patent/
[4] https://clubderklarenworte.de/zwischen-profit-und-propaganda-kriegsberichterstattung-im-mainstream/
[5] https://clubderklarenworte.de/big-pharma-duldet-keine-konkurrenz/
[6] https://clubderklarenworte.de/das-nahrungsmittelmonopol/
[7] https://clubderklarenworte.de/der-who-pandemievertrag-ueberprueft-und-erklaert/
[8] https://clubderklarenworte.de/die-spur-des-geldes/
[9] https://clubderklarenworte.de/arzneimittelzulassungsbehoerden/
[10] https://clubderklarenworte.de/die-bewusstseinserweiterung-zu-krisen-und-kriegen/
[11] https://clubderklarenworte.de/deja-deja-vu/
[12] https://clubderklarenworte.de/medienhysterie-um-den-klimawandel-was-steckt-dahinter/
[13] https://clubderklarenworte.de/wie-wir-der-natur-ins-handwerk-pfuschen/
[21] https://web.archive.org/web/20160814233104/http:/soros.dcleaks.com/view?div=eurasia
[30] https://anti-spiegel.ru/2024/soros-zahlt-fuer-den-kampf-gegen-das-bsw-und-das-zdf-hilft/
[33] https://reitschuster.de/post/jetzt-fuer-sie-dechiffriert-zynismus-a-la-ddr-im-thueringer-landtag/
[37] https://reitschuster.de/post/jetzt-fuer-sie-dechiffriert-zynismus-a-la-ddr-im-thueringer-landtag/
[41] The Thuringia Coup - Klartext - SciFi (sciencefiles.org)
[42] https://tkp.at/2024/06/13/totales-polit-chaos-in-frankreich/
[44] https://clubderklarenworte.de/zwischen-profit-und-propaganda-kriegsberichterstattung-im-mainstream/
English 
German 
Spanish
3 Responses
The AFD is the only party with a program that can be described as such and shortly before the election, the criminals in power will shamelessly write it off so that the differences blur and the German Michel lets himself be fooled again and re-elects the Germany-hater Habeck and the rest of the democracy destroyers.
Anyone who votes for the traffic light, Blackrockmerz or the Left is voting for the downfall of Germany and Europe, just as the WEF wants in its Great Reset Agenda.
The accusation is that the AfD is "völkisch". Well, it certainly isn't, because völkisch in the negative sense, i.e. National Socialist, would mean ethnocentrism. In other words, the definition of a homogeneous ethnic group that belongs to the same ethnic group and excludes all others. Not even Björn Höcke demands this. And if there are such voices in the AfD, then it would be appropriate to check whether they are not agents provocateurs of the VS, who in this way create their own grounds for surveillance.
To a large extent, the AfD is what the CDU used to be in its best days (i.e. long before Merkel). Nevertheless, it also had people in the party whose past was problematic. I'm thinking of Adenauer's State Secretary Globke, who was the commentator on racial laws under the Nazi regime, I'm thinking of Federal Chancellors and Federal Presidents who were members of the NSDAP, and so on.
Incidentally, there were also such people in the SPD and FDP. If you want to know more, please google. The Greens had real Nazis on their founding committee (e.g. Baldur Springmann) and a number of Green politicians have/had convinced Nazis as fathers and grandfathers. You can't say the same for the Left, because the blood of those shot at the inner-German border sticks to their hands.
As far as can be analyzed, none of the AfD members are burdened with such a past. Perhaps that is precisely what makes them so hated in the eyes of the other parties.
This is NOT an election appeal for the AfD, merely an attempt to interpret the prevailing situation on the basis of facts.
The theme is the globalists versus the particularists. Those who want the goal of a universal world under the rule of an elite. And those who see something special in every human being and the nation state as the guarantor of law and special characteristics. A world of global corporations and global authorities versus a world of sovereign nations that voluntarily follow certain common norms and laws. The Europe of the fatherlands versus the United States of Europe. The former has been given a boost by the global media, which have turned the world into a village, and by the rule of managers, who have made the anonymous large corporation possible. In China, we have the largest centralized state on earth, which demonstrates all the advantages of globalization and all the disadvantages as well: man as a number without individuality in state capitalism and controlled by the single party. Japan is not far behind. Singapore as well. A seductive model for our Western elites, which they emulate under the motto of globalization. The advantages are obvious, as are the disadvantages. The globalists have fought for domination because left-wing wishful thinking about socialist mankind is combined with capitalist efficiency thinking. This is one of the reasons why globalization is such a powerful project. Anything that stirs up conservative resistance is defamed and persecuted. Trump as well as Orban and the AfD. For details, see Rolf-Peter Sieferle, Epochenwechsel, Die Deutschen an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert.