by Dr. Johanna Weber //
The farmers' protests are currently on everyone's lips. But who knows the exact background? In order to understand this, it is first necessary to look at the 2030 Agenda, but also at other protests by farmers worldwide, before protests are once again defamed as "right-wing" [1, 5, 41].
The 2030 Agenda includes various points, also known as the "sustainable development goals". This agenda includes environmental goals, but also goals such as gender equality or health (pandemic management...). The focus of the agenda actually extends to almost all areas of our lives [2], and the implementation of the agenda is massively promoted by business, but also by foundations, unknown donors and so-called philanthropists - which is perhaps just another word for oligarchs. Before you immediately think of Russia - no. There are only seven Russians among the 100 richest people in the world, all ranked 58 and above [3]. Financial influence is actually more likely to be exerted by the super-rich who come from other countries, and this influence extends to the agricultural sector, as does the influence of the 2030 Agenda, which threatens individual countries' control over food availability [46].
Super-rich globalists have been buying up farmland around the world for years [34] and at the same time are trying to use their influence on politics to make all the regulations for farmers as unenforceable and costly as possible so that small and medium-sized farms go bankrupt. The current abolition of tax relief for farmers on the price of diesel is another step in this direction [20]. When farms go bankrupt, land can be bought cheaply. In Ukraine, for example, which is one of the largest grain exporters in the world [19], there has been massive land grabbing [21, 22], e.g. via the Vanguard share consortium [23], and there may also be large-scale land purchases in Hawaii following the recent fire disaster, although in this case more in relation to building plots [61, 62, 63, 64, 65]. Acquisitions in Ukraine increased again after President Zelensky's land reform in 2020 [28, 33], with Monsanto and German companies also involved on a large scale [27]. Poultry meat production in Ukraine is also in the hands of major international investors [44], and the country has to tolerate considerable influence from the World Bank on the national agricultural sector due to loans [45]. Ukraine could also be very interesting as a soybean cultivation area [29]. Disasters such as wars and fires therefore make it easier for buyers here. In the case of arable land, the goal is a kind of food monopoly, which (in addition to stock market profits from food speculation) is currently being sought by some global players not only through the control of land, but also through the control of seeds, fertilizers and pesticides [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13], presumably in part even through terrorist actions [57]. The Dutch government currently wants to buy up the "evil polluting" farms [24, 40], which has led to massive protests by farmers there, and farmers in Belgium have also protested against EU regulations that threaten their livelihoods [25]. In general, there are efforts worldwide to drive farmers off their land [34, 37], sometimes citing "climate protection" as a justification [24, 35].
Conspiracy theory? A theory, perhaps, but one that can be backed up with plenty of evidence. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) influences German agricultural policy through projects [4]. Bill Gates is financially linked to the aforementioned agricultural company Monsanto, which has already led to the takeover of farmland in India and Mexico [6]. Bill Gates is also the largest private owner of farmland in the USA [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. According to an inquiry by the Left Party to the Bundestag, the BMGF now has a volume in the billions in the agricultural sector [26]. The 2030 Agenda in particular is increasingly focusing on agriculture [30, 31], and the meetings at which the Agenda is discussed are full of actors supported by Bill Gates, George Soros or other major financiers such as Rockefeller or Ford [32, 40]. Monsanto had recently merged with Bayer and also bought up other agricultural companies in a quasi assembly-line fashion [38, 39]. Whether Gates has really cut down the 28 million hectares of forest "for the climate" or rather for farmland will perhaps be seen in how he subsequently uses the land [42, 43]. In any case, Gates has already been accused of monopolistic tendencies in similar contexts [59], and Soros' political activities should also be viewed critically, as he had massively promoted candidates favorable to him in national elections as if in a huge simulation game [60].
Participants such as the World Food Forum and the World Health Organization (WHO) [47] attend the regular meetings at which presentations are given on the status of implementation of the 2030 Agenda. The World Food Forum works together with UN Women, among others, and major sponsors of UN Women are - once again - Bill Gates and George Soros [48, 49]. The NGOs involved in the 2030 Agenda meet regularly in the NGO Major Group, but unfortunately the website of the NGO Major Group does not provide details of which NGOs have the say in this group [50]. In any case, the German Institute for Development and Sustainability is also involved in the 2030 Agenda and is largely financed by third-party funds. The Institute's annual report does not specify who exactly provides this third-party funding to support certain projects [51, 52]. For example, the Institute has members of the German Council on Foreign Relations in its executive board, and this is supported by business giants such as Springer, Oetker and - there he is again - George Soros via his Open Society Foundation [53, 54]. A large part of the 2030 Agenda is also financed by the Sustainable Development Fund, which also receives money from UN Women and the WHO as part of its projects. Both organizations are massively funded by Bill Gates [48, 55, 56], UN Women, as mentioned above, also by Soros and the Rockefeller mentioned above [48]. UN Women and WHO have invested their money in various country projects of the Sustainable Development Fund [56]. The 2030 Agenda is currently being criticized in the media [58].
It is now clear that the funding of major international organizations and the financing of projects implemented by these organizations (Agenda 2030, WHO pandemic treaty, etc.) is largely provided by private individuals, and rich private individuals, foundations and other NGOs are intertwined with the WHO, UN and so on in a highly questionable way. At the same time, our federal government is a member of the WHO and UN and is therefore bound by UN resolutions, for example. It's like politics through unelected organizations, governing through the back door. And our federal government is also bound by UN resolutions if they affect agriculture and thus our food supply, a sector where massive sales naturally take place every day, because almost everyone has to eat. So we should all be concerned to support the farmers in their protests.
Sources
[1] https://www.anti-spiegel.ru/2024/guter-protest-boeser-protest-klimakleber-versus-bauernprotest/
[3] https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/
[4] https://tkp.at/2023/08/01/deutschland-finanziert-gates-projekte-mit-38-milliarden-euro/
[5] https://www.gmx.net/magazine/politik/bevoelkerung-verstaendnis-bauern-strassenkleber-39043192
[7] https://rumble.com/v2cew8c-bill-gatess-most-awkward-interview-ever.html
[9] https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/wirtschaft/immobilien-wohnungen-bau-baubranche-insolvenz-100.html
[10] https://newint.org/features/2023/04/03/interview-vandana-shiva-india
[13] https://www.foodwatch.org/en/restrict-food-speculation-feed-people-not-banks
[18] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/apr/05/bill-gates-climate-crisis-farmland
[21] https://www.aktion-agrar.de/fressen-und-gefressen-werden/
[23] https://www.aljazeera.com/podcasts/2023/4/7/ukraines-other-land-grab
[26] https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/20/075/2007512.pdf
[27] https://dip.bundestag.de/vorgang/landgrabbing-in-der-ukraine/64662
[28] https://www.oaklandinstitute.org/new-report-take-over-ukrainian-agricultural-land
[30] https://www.bmz.de/de/agenda-2030
[31] https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
[32] https://sdgs.un.org/tfm/STIForum2023#side_events
[33] https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-agriculture-farmland-economy-/31336984.html
[34] https://www.oaklandinstitute.org/driving-dispossession
[38] https://www.oxfam.de/blog/fusion-bayer-monsanto-big-player-digitalen-landwirtschaft
[39] https://www.aktion-agrar.de/fressen-und-gefressen-werden/
[41] https://tkp.at/2024/01/09/pressespiegel-zum-bauernaufstand/
[43] https://slaynews.com/news/bill-gates-chop-down-70-million-acres-trees-fight-global-warming/
[45]
[47] https://sdgs.un.org/tfm/STIForum2023#side_events
[48] https://www.unwomen.org/en/partnerships/businesses-and-foundations/major-partners
[49] https://sdgs.un.org/tfm/STIForum2023#side_events
[50] https://www.ngomg.org/about-us
[51] https://www.2030agenda.de/de/event/2023-08/praesentation-des-reports-halbzeitbilanz-der-agenda-2030
[52] https://www.idos-research.de/en/about-us/mission-statement/
[53] https://dgap.org/de/foerderer
[54] https://www.idos-research.de/en/about-us/board-of-trustees/
[56] https://www.sdgfund.org/programmes
[57] https://www.anti-spiegel.ru/2023/die-ukraine-sprengt-russische-ammoniak-pipeline/
[61] https://rumble.com/v3b97t9-what-they-dont-want-you-to-know-about-the-maui-fires.html
[62] https://rumble.com/v38hf2n-holy-shthawaii-burns-but-are-the-conspiracies-true-stay-free-192.html
[63] https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/hawaii-property-lahaina-wildfires-1.6954189
English 
German 
Spanish
14 Responses
Unfortunately, I miss references in this article to the connection between the UKR coup and the war and where the reasons for this might lie. The UKR is the breadbasket of Europe and who benefits if there is war, if the UKR wants to join the EU, etc.?
What have UKR puppet governments done since the coup? They have sold off their country to "US investors" for their own profit! This is often forgotten.
Western governments are also not known for managing agriculture in the interests of citizens/supply security/sustainability. Almost every country in the EU could be completely self-sufficient in food, but no, because greed is greater than the ability to think, NO country can do it anymore. By preferring to cart grain/meat production etc. all over Europe, we are creating dependencies that are not necessary. This already starts today with seeds/fertilizers/chemicals!
And because there is a lack of insight, the little infrastructure in developing countries is being destroyed with subsidized EU products and forced free trade.
1. why does the EU no longer want traditional farmers?
Subsidizing agriculture costs 370 billion a year, which the EU no longer has or no longer wants to pay.
The political agenda within the framework of the Climate Agreement & Biodiversity Agreement provides for the complete end of conventional agriculture.
3. why is organic farming with conventional farmers dispensable?
Large-scale industrial processes are used to mass-produce agricultural products in organic quality under laboratory conditions.
This form of agriculture is easily verifiable on the basis of the facilities in Saudi Arabia, e.g. in Al-Jouf on the border with Jordan, which anyone can view on satellite maps.
4. how can large corporations farm in desert areas?
The corporations buy water rights and have the water delivered by climate control.
A well-known example is Ferrero's hazelnut plantation with over 2 million trees in Australia.
5 What is climate control?
Climate control is the long-term management and control of the water cycle through targeted interventions in the troposphere & stratosphere for military and commercial purposes.
The aim of climate control is to decide where and with what intensity it may rain, snow or hail.
As climate control cannot be limited to national airspaces, it is applied practically worldwide.
Anyone can easily recognize the implementation by regularly observing the sky, as long as the necessary knowledge of physics and meteorology is available.
The effects of climate control are global air pollution, droughts, extreme weather and flooding.
The full article is here:
Farmers are being robbed of their water by climate control!
https://geoarchitektur.blogspot.com/p/den-bauern-wird-das-wasser-per.html
Here is an example of how insane the subsidy policy is.
My father was better off selling the milk from the cows to the dairy than giving it to his own calves.
Father bought powdered milk because it was cheaper to buy milk that had been redissolved in water than he was getting for a liter of milk.
The milk, if it had previously been processed into powdered milk, cost about 12 pfennigs per liter, while the milk given by the calf's mother could be sold by the father for 31 pfennigs per liter.
A liter of milk, sold for 31 pfennigs, is collected from the farm, processed into powder in a drying plant and brought back to the farm and now costs only 12 pfennigs.
This is how subsidy policy works.
In my opinion, some aspects are missing here.
1 Brussels distributes 88 billion to EU landowners.
2. federal and state governments waive VAT (7%).
3. you get the vehicle tax for free.
4. they receive a partial refund of the mineral oil tax.
5. the districts often take over the waste disposal for the fattening farms.
Anyone whose dog or horse dies must pay for their own disposal,
6. As taxpayers, we built roads (farm tracks) for farmers. At that time for tractors with 16 tons and 25 km/h.
Now we have to rebuild them because they broke them with 50 tons and 50 km/h.
Don't get me wrong, that would be money well spent if we could get good food cheaply.
But the main argument in favor of subsidies is the statement that agriculture must be internationally competitive.
This means that if the production of a pig in this country would cost €200 without subsidies, but the world market is only prepared to pay €100, we as taxpayers have to add €100 so that the Chinese buy cheaper from us than fattening them ourselves.
Poultry is produced more cheaply here than in Africa.
If that were not alarming enough, there is a much bigger problem.
In the past, there was one livestock unit per hectare of land.
Now thousands of chickens and pigs are also being fattened in closed barns.
Much of the feed for this comes from Brazil, but the manure is also spread on fields and meadows here.
Nitrate, nitrite or whatever else comes together gets into rivers and the North and Baltic Seas via ditches.
In addition, it seeps away every year and about 1 meter. Our grandchildren then bring these substances up again as drinking water from 80 meters below.
This is not just nitrate, but also fungicides, herbicides, pesticides, glyphosate and other substances.
All this is necessary, otherwise the Chinese cannot afford our pork and the Africans cannot afford our poultry.
Congratulations Germany.
I think it is essential for the future that governments detach themselves from big business. But I don't think this will take place on highway ramps blocked by tractors, and certainly not at regulars' tables or in internet forums. This total division of society, in which each group considers itself the total guardian of truth and freedom and completely despises everyone else, is definitely not the way forward either...
Protest and criticism are important, but just look closely at which Pied Piper is holding the flute.
Thank you for that. I read it with great interest. It actually confirms, in a very well-founded and vivid way, what has long been said and published by critics defamed as conspiracy theorists: Our government does not govern, it is governed by big business.
This is repeated again and again in history until the big bang occurs, which leads to a revolution of some kind and thus the economic ruin of a civilization.
The terrible information policy, which is largely riddled with untruths, the increasing bullying and exploitation of the population, especially the middle class, the ever-widening gap between the super rich and the super poor, especially in the middle class, and the lack of serious political and economic alternatives must sooner or later lead us into a situation that goes far beyond arguing, discussing and demonstrating.
The farmers' protests are the beginning, which other sectors of the economy (e.g. SMEs and small businesses) will and must join if they do not want to disappear from the scene in the shortest possible time.
Neither red, yellow, green and certainly not black will get us out of this situation that they have been maneuvering us into for many years. That is not their goal either.
And brown, or blue if you like, are nothing more than proletarians imbued with fascist ideas who, as a pseudo-opposition, give the established parties the opportunity to present themselves as guardians of democracy and distract from the core problem.
The increasingly miserable education policy, which is obviously intended to make the population more and more stupid, because stupid is easier to control, a health system that has been driven hopelessly up against the wall and with it an almost inhuman pension system in which the needy, who have contributed all their lives, are dependent on handouts in order to survive, as well as the constant lying, selling and betrayal, are accelerants and political TNT that is being deliberately played with on the fire.
The list of construction sites where non-expert theorists fiddle around like a plasterer performing open-heart surgery is long (no offense to the honorable profession of plasterer, but his training does not extend to the complicated work of a surgeon).
This list is not getting any shorter due to the "meddling" of oligarchs without democratic legitimacy in the politics of sovereign(?) states.
As the farmers' association clearly distances itself from the "right", they probably have to accept politics from the "good" side.
A really interesting article, thank you for that. So Gates has cut down 28 million hectares of forest. The EU Deforestation Regulation comes into force at the end of 2024. In short, no products may be imported into the EU from deforested areas. Not the wood and not any other agricultural products grown on the deforested land.
In a mature, well-managed mixed forest, you can expect an average of around 300 to 600 cubic meters of wood per hectare. In general, a cubic metre of softwood weighs around 0.4 to 0.8 tons, while a cubic metre of hardwood can weigh around 0.5 to 0.9 tons.
That's quite a lot of wood, I think. I wonder where it's gone.
Current timber prices in Germany vary depending on the type and quality of wood. For the fourth quarter of 2023, the prices for spruce wood (BC quality) are between 79 and 82 euros per cubic meter (m³), for beetle wood (spruce) between 62 and 66 euros/m³ and for D quality between 52 and 56 euros/m³. Pine wood (BC quality) costs between 62 and 67 euros/m³ and D quality between 51 and 56 euros/m³. Oak logs are between 55 and 650 euros/mm, and beech logs or C-beech between 65 and 200 euros/mm. Softwood pallets are offered at 50-60 euros/mm, while industrial and firewood beech IL costs between 72 and 80 euros/mm and FK wood between 20 and 30 euros/mm.
What's going on?
Thanks for the informative article!
When checking the sources given, one page (source [22]) was no longer accessible. However, as the internet does not forget, the article could be found in the archives (keyword: WayBackMachine). The last backup date was 21.12.2023. The article was therefore available until this date. The article dates from 2015 and sheds light on some important details regarding the "land grab" in Ukraine. The article then disappeared between 21.12.2023 and 11.01.2024. Like the other sources, it is also very informative.
The current policy is gradually leading to the expropriation of farmers and the consolidation of control over the food chain. It is part of a global agenda. "He who controls the oil is able to control whole nations; he who controls the food controls the people," Henry Kissinger once said. Further background information on this topic can be found in this article https://dig-deeply.com/2023/09/15/nahrung-als-waffe/
To be honest: the effects of the SDG and land purchase have long been known to informed readers of various media. I refer you to Tom-Oliver Regenauer, for example.
https://www.regenauer.press/undemokratisch
I was expecting a bit more text, but maybe the footnotes offer something. But thanks for that, because every article that is shared contributes to clarification.
This is the first article I have seen that deals with the background to the policy against farmers worldwide. Yes, this concerns us all! Thank you for that.
It is high time to take to the streets! Just as we walkers forced the politicians' hand, everyone should do the same now.
so-called lateral thinkers and "right-wingers" have been stating these facts for years. The task of our government puppets is to push through the agenda in line with these philanthropists. "We decide something and if there is no loud outcry because most people don't understand what we are deciding, we just carry on"
As long as farmers, hauliers, tradesmen, etc. demonstrate on issues such as subsidies, cutting red tape or tolls, these crooks know that they really don't understand anything and simply carry on.
Everyone takes care of their own little issue and, standing in the forest, doesn't see the trees.
"Distanced" from the "right", the AFD and lateral thinkers, everyone is running towards the abyss together.
Have a good flight !