The prophet

by Peter Löcke //

Prophecies wherever you look. Gloomy visions of the future justify political decisions in the present. The prophecies are models, scenarios, dystopias, apocalyptic glimpses into the crystal ball of the day after tomorrow. They are designed on computers, formulated by experts and repeated thousands of times. What does the population think? So many people can't be wrong. That's why measures are needed. We need protective measures in the here and now to save the world of the future. 

If we don't adhere to 2G-plus today, if we don't all get vaccinated now, the healthcare system will collapse the day after tomorrow. Then the pandemic will never end. If we don't reduce our CO2 emissions and our ecological footprint today, the globe will burn the day after tomorrow. If we don't supply more weapons to Ukraine today, the Russians will be in Berlin the day after tomorrow. And so on. And now you're proving the opposite, you covidiot, swearer, denier and far-right misunderstander! You can't do that. The future cannot be refuted. Only past prophecies, such as those of Bill Gates, can be refuted or proven. Do you remember the interview in the Tagesthemen on April 12, 2020 [1]? A single sentence was discussed afterwards.

"We will eventually administer the vaccine to be developed to seven billion people!"

If you do the rule of three in your head, this means that almost 90 percent of the world's population should be vaccinated. In purely linguistic terms, Gates' statement was not formulated as a suggestion, but as an accomplished future. As a definite plan that is now being implemented. As a fact at a time when any form of compulsory vaccination was still officially relegated to the realm of conspiracy theory. And yet the sentence didn't scare me. It was in line with what other actors were saying in similar terms. Gates' prophecies were interesting. His visions. The end of the interview was really interesting.

"The world won't be the same after this pandemic. What exactly do you think will change?"

At the end of the obsequiously conducted interview, TV presenter Ingo Zamperoni asked Bill Gates to take a look into the crystal ball. The powerful billionaire was asked to paint a picture of the post-pandemic world. Gates' lengthy answer was fascinating and can now, more than four years later, be compared with reality.

"I believe that the warning that we need to prepare thoroughly for the next pandemic will be taken seriously this time (...) We will be better prepared next time. And the platforms that make this possible will also be useful for existing diseases. We are looking for RNA vaccines for all infectious diseases (...)."

After the pandemic is before the pandemic? This is reminiscent of the old soccer motto "after the game is before the game". Whether it's monkeypox or a new type of bird flu - a supposedly new deadly virus keeps popping up in the media. In addition, the WHO's pandemic treaty is on the home straight. And platforms such as Biontech are working on RNA drugs and cancer vaccines. So Gates' first prophecy has come true. And what next?

"Our behavior will have changed after this crisis. Maybe we will do a lot more things online after we are forced to do so now."

Human behavior has indeed changed. The digitally distanced person is increasingly replacing the human being as an analog, social being. Mr. Gates seemed euphoric. The idea makes my blood run cold. And I have a question. Has the virus forced us to do this or have political decisions forced us to do this? But Billy Boy also thinks about human suffering when he looks to the future. Or so it seems.

"People who had to live in isolation during this time, who had to deal with great uncertainty, the children who lost valuable school time (...)"

Remarkable. The interview was conducted on April 12, 2020. The first lockdown and the first school closures had only been in place for three weeks. Many people hoped that the lockdown would be over by the summer at the latest. The "philanthropist" already knew at this point that older people would be isolated for longer and that children would lose valuable school time. This prophecy also came true. But let's continue with the text.

"We will have to thoroughly clean up economic life after the crisis. After all the traumas that people have had to go through (...)"

What exactly is meant by cleaning up the economy? Wasn't it always said that the economy was to be protected by the measures? Now there is an admittedly audacious conspiracy theory. This theory states that the collateral damage to the economy caused by lockdowns was not only ignored and played down. This theory says that the damage to the economy was the real goal. A slash-and-burn of the existing, a destruction of the middle class in particular, in order to build something new. In the words of Bill Gates: the economy was to be thoroughly cleaned up. The finance minister at the time, Olaf Scholz, did not pull a rescue package out of the metaphorical cupboard. It was a bazooka. Will Gates' last prophecy, with which the interview concludes, also come true?

"And unfortunately, we are also facing a dramatic upheaval here. Our behavior will change in many ways. I also hope that we don't forget other things like climate change because of the pandemic (...)."

I can reassure Mr. Gates. The issue of climate change has not been forgotten by the political-media complex. Or is it humanity that should not forget about climate change? Who actually is "we"? Ingo Zamperoni did not ask these or any other critical questions.

Articles identified by name do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the publisher.

Share post:

8 Responses

  1. Since this interview, I can no longer take Mr. Zamperoni seriously as a journalist. Every trainee learns to ask the crucial questions in the first few weeks. He didn't ask a single one, for example, as mentioned in the article: Who are we? Apparently, Mr. Gates counts himself as one of them, thinking that as a medical layman he can decide on the "vaccination" of 7 billion people. Zamperoni should have addressed this boundless hubris and audacity alone. But for him, the only thing that counts is "whose bread I eat, the song I sing."

  2. Personally, I am shocked. I was one of the gullible ones. It was only "C" that made me sit up and take notice. These scaremongering panic messages, coming out of a magic hat, they just kept coming. And everyone went along with it, once again ...
    Our country has been emptied. Like a box. Room after room was swept empty. First across the board, among the people, and finally in lockdown, several of them.
    "They" at the top turned their position into absolute rulers. Health alarmists. Crisis conjurers. Every impossibility was realized. And: they are still alive. Those who put themselves above their people and continue to do so. The oh-so-deadly virus has not killed them. They continue to act happily with the support of the established journalists. Peaceful citizens and taxpayers, critics of the measures were suddenly the ones who were declared war on. This farce continues to this day in all areas.
    In the current political world, empty words, meaningless formulations, assertions and division reign.
    So many lies and deception.
    Yesterday we were informed that our former CDU Chancellor was attending the farewell ceremony for Mr. Jürgen Tretin. She did not accept the invitation to speak at the current CDU party conference. Questionable, isn't it?

  3. Bill Gates explained the world and its vaccination for seven long minutes on the news. Anyone who still didn't know what was going to happen then also believed in the narrative of Atta at the controls of the hundred-ton jet on its approach to the World Trade Center. That's quite a few people, no wonder - not believing in it would turn the world upside down for them. At least that's what happened to me. Nordstream is another one of those things. When I heard about it, it was like a punch in the gut, war against Germany. It was clear to me that this was a military attack, not terrorism. Since there is no real effort on the part of the German judiciary to solve this crime, which violates international law, it can be assumed that the perpetrators and the course of events are known in outline. This pipeline was not even Trump's right, yet it was supposedly Putin's boys? Or whoever, with a sailing yacht? Many people don't even want to know, it could be that another certainty is being shaken.

  4. These philanthropists are a danger to humanity. They think they are God. Through their wealth, they believe they can change the course of the stars. Much worse are corrupt politicians who allow people to become so rich through tax manipulation that they can destroy entire countries!

  5. How do you do?
    I can support your text in its entirety and the question arises in my mind: Why did Mr. Zamperoni conduct his daily topics so obsequiously with Mr. Gates? The fact that Mr. Gates has so much money in his treasure chest will probably answer this question. Sad, because Mr. Gates is nothing more than a small light in the starry sky - so infinitely tiny in his structure that nature does not notice him in any way. He buys and buys and talks and talks, but nobody really cares.
    Mr. Gates the Bill is just a tiny UN light in the starry sky. All I can say is that all human failings are the result of a lack of love. Mr. Gates, a tip from me: sit down under an old tree and listen to all the birds singing, it will do you good. Best regards birgithoyer

    1. According to this assessment, the majority of all rulers belong to this "association"; who will now free us from the "madhouse"?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to this platform for the cultivated exchange of arguments.

We have forgotten how to endure contradiction. It is okay to disagree here. I would ask you to remain respectful and polite. Insults and hate comments will be removed in future, as will calls to vote for political parties. I reserve the right to delete insulting or derogatory comments. This public forum and its inherent opportunity to exchange arguments and opinions is an attempt to uphold freedom of expression - including freedom of dissent. I would like to see the old-fashioned virtue of respect cultivated here.

"Controversy is not an annoying evil, but a necessary prerequisite for the success of democracy." Federal President Dr. h.c. Joachim Gauck (ret.), only 5 years ago in his speech on the Day of the Basic Law.

en_USEnglish