by Dr. Johanna Weber
We often read in many places that the pandemic was planned. Hardly anyone provides evidence of this. It seems time to ask who might have had a motive for it in the first place.
At the end of 2019, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), together with the World Economic Forum and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, carried out a simulation exercise for a virus transmitted from bats to humans and immediately afterwards provided substantial funding for the fight against Covid-19 in January 2020 [1, 2]. The foundation was therefore prepared for the pandemic for unknown reasons and was already in contact with the German government in May 2019 (see below). At the same time, the foundation is exempt from income tax [3]. The foundation would therefore certainly have a motive to promote the development of a novel virus and also market the appropriate vaccines.
There is also the question of who owns the laboratory in Wuhan from which the virus could have been released into the population. The laboratory belongs to the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) , which together with the University of Queensland (Australia) receives its money from a joint fund where it is not possible to trace where the money comes from [4], and the laboratory has been cooperating with various universities and institutions from the USA since at least 2015 with regard to research into possible transmission routes from bats to humans [5].
In addition to CAS and the University of Queensland, the USA has also financially supported the laboratory in Wuhan through the Eco Health Alliance and the National Institute for Health (NIH) [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. The laboratory also works with the WHO, which interestingly has received large donations from the BMGF [7, 11].
It is also interesting to note that the coronavirus vaccine manufacturer Johnson & Johnson (J&J) also supports the laboratory in Wuhan via the Eco Health Alliance and Queensland University [12, 13, 14]. And one of J&J's largest shareholders is Blackrock, along with Vanguard and Statestreet, which are also partly owned by Blackrock (and vice versa). Other shareholders of J&J are JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America and other shareholders in which Blackrock has shares and which are managed by Blackrock. Blackrock is therefore very closely linked to the laboratory via J&J [15, 16].
No one knows for whom Blackrock has acquired and manages which shares. It could be Bill Gates as well as George Soros, Klaus Schwab or any other major investor. As of January 11, 2023, Biontech and Pfizer are listed separately on Nasdaq and have sold 68.27 and 15.26 %, respectively, to investors [17, 18], including a portion to BMGF [19]. Large parts were also sold to Blackrock, Statestreet, Deutsche Bank, Goldman & Sachs and JP Morgan. A large proportion of these shares are therefore practically in the same hands, as the banks and asset managers mentioned are interlinked and nobody knows which foundations or private investors are behind the assets managed by Blackrock and other shadow banks. It should be noted that it is considered normal for the main shareholder to hold 3 - 6 % of the shares, but not 9, 15 or even 68 % [3].
The question of what was discussed at the CDU party conference in Leipzig shortly before the start of the pandemic in November 2019 could also be relevant. There are detailed reports on all CDU party conferences on wikipedia - but not on this one [20]. In any case, the speakers at the CDU/CSU parliamentary group meeting on May 8, 2019, i.e. before the start of the pandemic, were WHO head Ghebreyesus, Christian Drosten, Jeremy Farrar from the British Health Authority and Joe Cerrell from the BMGF [21]. The question arises as to whether, and if so, how, German, British and other politicians have benefited from the pandemic. Olaf Scholz's brother has clinics and presumably benefited from the corona intensive care bed surcharge in this context. In some cases, patients were transferred in order to siphon off more money [22, 23]. The British Prime Minister Rishi Sunakh presumably has shares in Moderna. He was a founding member of Theleme Partners, an investor that has shares in Moderna and had a five-year contract for mRNA research with Astra Zeneca before the pandemic began. The UK has just signed further contracts with vaccine manufacturers [24, 25, 26]. This list could probably go on and on, with the keywords being Spahn and the mask affair.
The question of when the PCR test was developed is also interesting, considering Drosten's collaboration with Chinese authorities in this context in the run-up to the pandemic [27]. It is also important to ask why Drosten's publication on the new test procedure, which presumably contains errors [28], could be published in the specialist press after only one day of review [29]. It is absolutely unusual for a scientific article to be published so quickly, as anyone who works with such journals as an editor, author or reviewer like the author knows.
Another exciting fact: Shortly before the outbreak of the pandemic, US soldiers were present at the Wuhan Army Games in China [30], and the US Department of Defense, together with the Ministry of Health, has for years maintained bioweapons laboratories in China and other countries worldwide where research is being conducted on coronaviruses and other pathogens [31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, ], and the Chinese Ministry of Defense is also involved [33, 38]. The Imperial College of London is also conducting research on coronaviruses with funding from the BMGF [39]. The novel coronaviruses were patented well before the start of the pandemic, as were the vaccines [40, 41, 42, 43]. There have also been research patents since before the pandemic that protect a technology that involves inserting gene sequences into viruses in such a way that it is no longer possible to tell whether these viruses originated naturally or in a laboratory [44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49]. Research into viruses, vaccines and insertion technologies has been going on for years, by the very players who are now also making money from vaccines, including Moderna alongside J&J, for example. Moderna has received funding from the US Department of Defense, Merck KG and the BMGF. So US taxpayers' money was used for Moderna's research patent, but Moderna (and perhaps Rishi Sunakh or other shareholders) is now making money from it [50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60].
If shadow banks use the assets of corporations, governments, foundations and billionaires to finance research into viruses and suitable vaccines, and then the same shadow banks also invest the assets of the same aforementioned players in shares in vaccine manufacturers, then the question arises as to whether the politicians who buy the vaccines for their country benefit from this. Generally speaking, that's a lot of coincidences at once. So there are definitely profiteers. You can decide for yourself whether this was planned...
Sources
[1] https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340236453_The_Event_201
[3] https://punkt-preradovic.com/regieren-blackrock-co-die-welt-mit-dr-werner-ruegemer/
[4] https://science.des.qld.gov.au/industry/collaboration/china/academy-science
[5] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26552008/
[6] http://english.whiov.cas.cn/International_Cooperation2016/Partnerships/
[7] https://www.nzz.ch/wissenschaft/neutraler-insider-oder-voreingenommener-mitwisser-ld.1647914
[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSt7ls2zIoY
[9] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIYWc4y2Zy0
[10] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_f%C3%BCr_Virologie_Wuhan
[11] https://www.who.int/about/funding/invest-in-who/investment-case-2.0/current-state
[12] https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/partners
[13] https://science.des.qld.gov.au/search?query=johnson%20and%20johnson
[14] https://science.des.qld.gov.au/industry/collaboration/usa/relationship
[15] https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/jnj/institutional-holdings
[16] https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/institutional-portfolio/blackrock-inc-711679
[17] https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/pfe/institutional-holdings
[18] https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/bntx/institutional-holdings
[19] https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/institutional-portfolio/bill–melinda-gates-foundation-1037700
[20] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parteitag_der_CDU_Deutschlands_2019
[23] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXs85BB-1MA
[24] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYiwms-Yp5s
[25] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH3AFYVn3T8
[26] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDLx1IAITTg
[29] https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045
[30] https://prospect.org/coronavirus/did-the-military-world-games-spread-covid-19/
[32] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI3mxXLUMK0
[40] https://www.swfinstitute.org/news/91484/scientists-discover-dna-chunk-in-covid
[41] https://www.gospanews.net/en/2022/03/22/wuhan-gates-48-moderna-vaccine-patented
[42] https://uspto.report/patent/grant/9587003
[44] https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-9587003-B2
[45] https://patents.google.com/patent/US9587003B2/en
[47] https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US-9587003-B2
[48] https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fviro.2022.834808/full
[50] https://www.genengnews.com/topics/omics/merck-co-moderna-launch-100m-mrna-partnership/
[51] https://www.genengnews.com/topics/omics/moderna-wins-initial-20m-grant-from-gates-foundation/
[52] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426978/
[53] https://www.extremnews.com/berichte/weltgeschehen/dc5018ce11ec075
[54] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH3AFYVn3T8
[55] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaJt5jC5gbY
[56] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEh5JyZC218
[57] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DwIfrFbyuI
[58] https://southfront.org/pentagon-bio-weapons/
English 
German 
Spanish
12 Responses
Fakt ist, dass es um viel Geld geht! Man könnte fast schon lapidar sagen, um was sonst! Aber, was verfolgt das Militär hier eigentlich für Interessen? Die Patente für die einzelnen Bestandteile der Injektionen und wohl auch auf die Viren gehören ja offensichtlich dem Pentagon und das schon seit über 20 Jahren!! Was zum Teufel läuft hier für ein mieses Spiel? Ist das der Grund, warum die Impfpflicht bei den Soldaten nicht aufgehoben wird? Dass diese Blörre nicht im mindesten das hält was sie verspricht, wissen wir ja jetzt zur Genüge. Also, welchen Grund gibt es sonst noch, gegen die bestehenden Gesetze für die Soldaten und ihre Gesunderhaltungspflicht, ihnen weiterhin diese vom Teufel persönlich signierten Injektionen, unter Androhung harter Strafen bis Rauswurf und Berufsverbot aufzuzwingen??? Ich werde den Verdacht nicht los, dass die Soldaten hier für ein millitärisches Experiment missbraucht werden, dessen Konsequenzen noch nicht absehbar sind. Ich kann nur hoffen, dass die von Mutter Natur installierten Biologischen Grundgesetze zum Einsatz kommen und die Menschen, die diesem weltweiten Betrug geglaubt haben oder zu den Injektionen gezwungen wurden, keinen größeren Schaden davon tragen. Sie hat uns geschaffen und sie entscheidet, wie lange wir bleiben dürfen und nicht diese teuflischen sogenannten „Eliten“!!!
Chapeau!
Vielleicht mal mit Thomas Röper (Antispiegel) kurzschließen, der hat in seinem Buch „Inside Corona“ relativ gut die finanziellen Verflechtungen dargestellt und wichtige Personen genannt die an verschiedenen Stellen in verschiedenen Funktionen vorkamen, deutlich vermehrt ab 2016.
I miss one name in your article, also in relation to the Eco Health Alliance: Peter Daszak.
This gentleman's track is very interesting.
If I may put a link here https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/kommt-das-virus-aus-einem-labor-in-wuhan-dem-raetsel-auf-der-spur-ld.1666314
contains an interview with Prof. Wiesendanger.
I would like to add a few thoughts to Dr. Weber's research, which I would like to place in this open debate space for all interested fellow human beings
The trail of incentives
Politicians in positions of power follow different incentive structures for their actions to try to achieve their individual, personal goals than people who aspire to a political career but have not yet reached a position of political power.
Administrators in positions of power in a state institution (functionaries) follow different incentive structures for their actions in order to try to achieve their individual, personal goals than people who aspire to a professional career as an administrator (functionary) in a state institution and have not yet reached a position of power in the state administrative apparatus.
An entrepreneur who is dependent on the state, reliant on the state or privileged by the state follows different incentive structures for his actions in order to try to achieve his individual, personal goals than entrepreneurs who are independent of the state and whose product and service offerings are produced at their own expense and responsibility and sold and profits generated via voluntary customer demand and voluntary consumers.
Researchers and scientists who are dependent on government agencies and/or funds and/or certificates and/or publications in certain journals follow different incentive structures for their actions in order to try to achieve their individual, personal goals than people who are interested in an object of knowledge and research and explore it independently of government funds, government certificates, government agencies and certain journals at their own expense and on their own responsibility out of pure curiosity, interest and thirst for knowledge.
It is also very interesting and insightful to consider and research the incentive structures that set
- the current monetary system
- a zero and negative interest rate policy
- Educational institutions in which principals, teachers and professors primarily only talk to each other about administrative matters and also have to get as many pupils and students through to graduation as possible if they do not want to lose their jobs or even aspire to political careers
- Educational opportunities for pupils and students, consisting primarily of state curricula, with the aim of collecting state-standardized certificates/certificates
with the people and
What dynamic processes develop from this?
You will be surprised, if you have not already dealt with these and other questions and considerations on your own, what exciting and revealing insights you can gain.
Bei Sven Böttcher ist zu hören, dass es massive Bestrebungen geben soll, noch in diesem Jahr eine weitere Pandemie auszurufen und dass dieses Mal mit aller Härte durchgegriffen werden soll und niemand mehr an der „Impfung“ vorbeikommen wird…
Does anyone have any clear words on this?
My clear answer is: Over my dead body!!! Nobody will force vaccinate me or my family!!!
The only thing I can spontaneously pass on here today is a statement in the video by Prof. Dr. Dr. Martin Haditsch (https://youtu.be/lz974gx-0QI) from minute 3:40 onwards on the amendment to the WHO pandemic treaty. I have already heard about this topic, the effects, the compulsory vaccinations with effect from 2024 on other alternative channels. KLA.TV has also recently published an article and a video on this topic; I have read the article but not yet watched the video (https://youtu.be/lz974gx-0QI). In an interview in 2022, Bill Gates announced a next, even bigger pandemic for 2025 at the latest. Now that resistance in many countries has increased significantly in recent months, it would be understandable if the rulers were now a little pressed and wanted to speed up the game! God save us all from these plans, our current government team and the WHO. Amen.
On the Internet you can find a paper from John Hopskin University with the title:
T H E S P A R S P A N D E M I C
2 0 2 5 – 2 0 2 8
A F u t u r i s t i c S c e n a r i o f o r P u b l i c H e a l t h R i s k C o m m u n i c a t o r s
You can read about this in the Epochtimes:
„Die Johns Hopkins University veröffentlichte im Jahr 2017 ein wissenschaftliches Papier über
the course of the pandemic. The document is strongly reminiscent of "Event 201", which only contains one
month before the outbreak of the corona virus was organized in Wuhan, China, and the
rehearsing the worst-case scenario of a deadly pandemic. In the 77-page paper from Johns Hopkins
University, the course of the current corona crisis is described in astonishing detail.
Interestingly, crisis simulations that anticipate tragic events, such as
is explained in detail in a report by "Heise". With "many of the
best-known terrorist attacks in Western cities in the last 15 years (Paris 2015,
Boston 2013, Norway 2011, London 2005, Madrid 2004, New York and Washington 2001)
were immediately preceded by emergency drills, which often also followed a scenario that
became reality in a very similar way," the report states.
The Johns Hopkins University pandemic simulation is set in the years 2025 to 2025.
2028 ab.“
Perhaps this information will help you.
What else is there to comment on this article? I don't believe that this multi-billion background will ever lead to relevant proceedings or convictions. What remains for the individual is the experience (cf. Erich Fromm) and perhaps the bonus of being able to say NO in future with better background knowledge.
Es müsste in diesem Zusammenhang noch darauf hingewiesen werden, dass schon kurz nach Beginn der Pandemie von der Kanzlerin, die ihre Nähe zu Bill und Melinda Gates durchaus bekanntgab, nur die Impfung als einziger Ausweg propagiert wurde, und von den „Experten“ andere Mittel (Vitamin D, Ivermectin, …) diskreditiert wurden, was sogar zu Therapieverboten führte.
Hello, maybe not planned but copied, have you ever seen Amazing Spiederman from 2012? It's a prankster who thinks evil when an imperfect RMNA sequence is supposed to regrow limbs, be tested on humans as a flu vaccine and the one with the spider bite tolerates it perfectly (part 2 explains why) and the rest turn into repulsive reptiles.