On July 10 at 5:43 a.m., I received an email from the YouTube team informing me in a standardized text that the video interview with toxicologist and immunologist Prof. Dr. Hockertz, published three days earlier, "For the first time a vaccination changes the GENOME. Danger of the Corona COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine explained", was reported for review and does not comply with the "community guidelines". That is why it was deleted.
There is the option of lodging a complaint against such deletions in a YouTube mask. Recognized, done! At 14:50 on the same day, I sent the following text to the YouTube team:
"Hello, the deleted video deals with a conversation between a scientist and a journalist about the opportunities and risks of vaccinations in general and mRNA vaccinations in particular. It does not violate community guidelines or the journalistic, ethical and moral principles of accurate journalistic work. We are not pursuing any political or economic interests by publishing on your platform. We would therefore ask you to review the deletion and to reactivate the article. Thank you for your kind efforts and best regards
Markus Langemann"
At 3:37 pm, just 47 minutes later, I received a standardized response. After a further review, the video violates community guidelines. Fun fact: The video is around 60 minutes long. How it could be checked in less than 47 minutes - counting reception and communication time - is impressive. Even a cursory examination seems unlikely here.
I consider the removal of relevant content to be remarkable and extremely strange. It does not excite me.
The motives behind the removal are open to speculation. You can talk about pharma-controlled interests and "the lobbyists". You can talk about Google health fascists who control unwelcome content and, if necessary, take it down. Perhaps the content controllers employed by ALPHABET are just not properly medicated and have uncontrollable twitches in their clicking fingers. We don't know.
You may be disappointed, but I am not shocked and in principle I do not see the freedom of the press in danger. You and I can publish and express our findings and opinions everywhere. YouTube barks, the caravan moves on.
Nevertheless, free speech and the free press are coming under increasing pressure, that is probably true. The reasons for this are as varied as the media makers are diametrically opposed to them. The economic pressure is enormous. The need to generate new click-worthy headlines every hour when the content shortage is at its greatest, simply stealing them from the tabloids in England, is evident.
That now of all things those digital platforms such as YouTube or Facebook that first triggered the pressure on the traditional press houses and The fact that some of the old journalistic warhorses and alternative media adepts have already hailed them as the Elysium for their "anything goes" attitude is an excellent web joke.
But I can reassure you!
The vocabulary in Google and Facebook seminars sounds different today, but is still just synonyms of those from back then. It's always about reach, serving target groups, avoiding switch-off impulses and keeping people "on board" with the respective platform. People surf hard on the wind of what is permitted by the regulations, often diving under them.
If there is a threat of advertising money or license withdrawal, the publicist-journalist backbone behaves like a folding folding rule. Today as in the past.
In the 90s, it was not uncommon for anyone who could staple Farkopien correctly as an intern at Pro Sieben 4 to be a studio manager, editorial director or some kind of communication group head junior second floor assistant at color television two weeks later with a smartly oiled head of hair. The corridors were full of lava lamps. Nice to look at, but not really bright. In my opinion, sound training and even just education has always been a rare guest in media circles. But if you had a thick frontal lobe in your cerebrum and still somehow got stuck "in the media", it was not uncommon for you to ask God for the serenity of a chair. After all, he has to be able to cope with every ass.
Today, the media proletariat of yesteryear finds its equivalent in the digital engine room of online corporations. Nothing new in the West.
So I'm not personally shocked by the blocking of content in the second largest search engine in the world, which is owned by the largest in the world. YouTube is an American platform and it determines what is played on it. RTL, Sat1 ARD, ZDF and myriads of local, regional and national domestic radio stations also determine what goes "on the air" and what they would "rather not broadcast".
The arguments range from "You can't do that right now, we just got advertising money from that company" or "Nah, I'm really not in the mood for a call from the state chancellery."
Scissors in heads and in digital editing programs are the siblings of folding chair-like civil courage in many radio and online houses. Why is that? The reasons are numerous here too. Food for thought:
Put me in the shoes of an extraterrestrial for a minute who is just dropping by and wants to see where we are right now. Suppose he comes at the weekend and lands somewhere in the Altmühltal. Then creatures walk past him with Wolfskin jackets on their bodies and poles in their hands to support themselves on the ground.
But not really either. If you take the poles away from Nordic walkers, for example, they don't fall over at all and remain helpless.
I think Nordic walking degrades humans, who invented the upright gait 10 million years ago in the course of hominization. We torture ourselves on all fours through ancient dinosaur shit in the Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous periods until we understand: We don't have to get our hands dirty to move forward!
We have finally invented the upright gait and then this ski pole industry comes along. They tell us we have to walk on poles even in summer.
Take a look!
No wonder many of our species no longer have a backbone. This is a natural evolutionary instability. I wouldn't be surprised if in 10,000 years' time we're all crawling on all fours across our bankirai terraces again.
Recognize and stay calm!
However, if you are reading this in Central Europe, in German-speaking countries or in Germany, then you should be concerned about other developments:
Facebook is a American platform and we use it to organize our social lives. Twitter is a American Platform and politicians are making fun of their political competitors. Instagram is a American platform, we post about it. YouTube is a American platform we consume and publish on. Amazon is a american companies, we store on them until we faint. Ebay is a American platform we use to sell our trinkets. Netflix is a American platform, we have fun with it. Paypal is a American platform, we distribute money via it. ApplePay is a American platform, we pay via it. Visa, Mastercard and Amex are American Companies we pay about. Google is a american Company, we are looking for it. AirBnB is an American company, we travel with it. Wikipedia is a american company, we inform ourselves about it.
The list is longer, my time is not.
I don't think it's healthy to base public, economic, social and cultural life almost exclusively on American platforms to organize and celebrate.
One click from Trump & Co. and we're offline. Complete.
q.e.d.
Where are the poets, thinkers and digitizers of our country?
The biggest turning points in life are rarely major events. Sometimes all it takes is two people sitting at the kitchen table. Become active and perhaps also an activist, but remain a democrat.
Good night Germany.
Markus Langemann
English 
German 
Spanish
59 Responses
Hello,
I would like to know which vaccine the interview was referring to specifically? As far as I know, no vaccine exists yet, at least not one that has been approved in Europe. Thank you very much!
You can find the interview here:http://clubderklarenworte.de/impfstoff-veraendert-unser-genom/ Best regards M.L.
Super work.
Well, what are we supposed to do? We need a real democracy! Maybe every few years we should randomly select 5000 Germans between 14 and 100+ and let them make policy? Parties should be abolished, what do personal identities have to do with our politics, e.g. I vote for Merkel or Söder, eh what? It's time for something new. Unfortunately, there were similar voices shortly before the First World War.
A real enrichment, your site and sensationally well written! clubderklarenworte. de as well.
"I would desperately like there to be some kind of conspiracy among those who make the media to be humanly encouraging."
Richard Karl Freiherr von Weizsäcker
Dear Mr. Langemann,
Thank you for your courage!
Constant dripping wears away the stone - in this sense, my motivational contribution to the tireless progress of all people with clear thoughts and words. In particular, I would like to express my admiration and thanks to you!
My motto is: don't let up, stay motivated and keep going!
A.K.Ö.
I don't even know why I downloaded the video back then... 😉
If you like, just click here:
https://youtu.be/zAT1Ez_NKvc
Dear Mr. Langemann,
Your articles are always a real ray of hope for me in these times. That's my idea of journalism. I admire your courage - but above all the clarity with which you get to the heart of the matter. Please don't let up. I believe that more and more people are waking up and seriously questioning what is happening.
I bow my head in gratitude.
Chapeau.
Dear Thomas Hofmann, thank you very much for your words of appreciation. They make me very happy. Yours, M.L.
The most dangerous person for the state is the one who listens, thinks and critically scrutinizes everything. With massive support from the public service dumbing-down industry, this perfidious Merkel government has apparently managed over the last 16 years or so to educate the people of poets and thinkers into a nation of fools and nodders, because those who don't think are controlled! This government lives from lies and will die from the truth - provided that the Germans wake up from their deep sleep as quickly as possible and do not tend to continue to close their eyes to reality.
Thank you very much for your excellent work.
Many thanks to someone who still finds clear words in a world populated by too many empty phrase users. Fortunately, I listened to the Hockertz interview before it was deleted and took some notes. Pen and paper can sometimes be very useful. Much strength for your future work, dear Mr. Langemann!
Dear Kristiane, thank you very much for your words. Tip: You can now find a transcript of the entire interview on the homepage.
Hello Mr. Langemann,
I can only agree wholeheartedly with Peter's contribution. I happen to be reading Sebastian Haffner's "History of a German" at the moment.
Reading this makes my hair stand on end. It's quite frightening to see how the images are so similar in many areas.
Haffner, who was a trainee lawyer at the Prussian court at the time, describes how, relatively quietly and smoothly, quite serious republicans became
National Socialists and that it was precisely among the educated middle classes, who were thought to be so resistant, that there was the least resistance to the quite recognizable transformation from a constitutional state to a dictatorship. I am always appalled when I talk to people who I thought were analytical and intelligent (which they certainly are) and realize that they are the very people who naively believe just about any nonsense in the media and politics. And I now think I know why this is the case. If we were to accept that we are being lied to on the broadest front, the idea of a world that is still relatively intact would collapse. This collapse is extremely painful, because it would force us to completely readjust the essential parameters of our beliefs. And that is cruel, but unfortunately we are (once again) at such a crossroads.
Hello Mr. Ploppa, another reading recommendation: The correspondence between Thomas Mann and Hermann Hesse. The personal and social worries and hardships of those days, which can be experienced directly from the wonderful correspondence, are similar in mood to the feelings of our time. It is very moving.
Dear Mr. Langemann, you have written this really beautifully and I can sense that you are not really sorry. I will do the same for you, because my well-trained mind and my capacity for subtle feeling can no longer stand the fact that people who probably don't even know who Rainer Maria Rilke, Albert Camus or Johann Sebastian Bach are are exerting such a shallow and darkly manipulative influence on the current fate of this country, indeed the whole world, and that we have to stand idly by and watch the hard-won freedoms (which may never have been freedoms, ok). I can no longer find words for this decline, which is becoming established in all areas of social interaction in a way that actually frightens me, a person trained in systemic analysis and experienced in therapy. Yes, I feel deep fear with many objects, and if I had not been able to learn to trust in my life that everything always has to happen the way it does, with each individual and also in groups, societies and even the One Whole, so that the meaning is fulfilled, then I would no longer know for sure whether I would still want to participate in it. But yes, I do want to, absolutely, I want to see where all this will lead us - even if I truly resent all of this and am so ashamed of it. Sincerely, Hartmut Kriese
Dear Mr. Krise, stay calm and enjoy the one or other wonderful cantata, remembering Rilke, who famously said: "It is the art - to live!
The post was excellent. But I don't think Donald Trump would delete it, there's enough evidence for that.
Servus,
I like your tone and the clarity of the research, so I also try to guide others to the "new/old reality" by sharing the posts. Of course, I don't always have to agree with you, such as the story with the walkers... A little more empathy please. Please keep it up, it's good for you.
lG
Dear Mr. Langemann,
I can only agree with the previous speakers and encourage you to keep moving forward with your work, eloquence, integrity and courage. You are a ray of hope for many people - including me. Since the beginning of the corona madness, which still leaves me stunned from time to time, I have been following your contributions and those of Prof. Hockertz and a few others. I am deeply saddened to see that many people in this fear hysteria are only concerned with ego-driven dogmatism and not with the common, truthful clarification and honest classification of the (non-)dangerousness of this virus. Too many people have been given too much power and attention in the first few weeks and are now doing everything they can to keep both. It concerns me that in a country like Germany, it is not possible to have a controversial, scientific debate in the scientific community, to form a crisis team of experts with different opinions and to provide the government with balanced advice on a scientific basis.
I will certainly stay in touch with you...
Dear Ms. Schröder, you say exactly what I feel all the time! It's a shame that there are so few of my friends and acquaintances in Leipzig who feel the same way.
Hello,
I like it, especially the one with the alien. https://www.instagram.com/tv/CAxtSsrgtgY/?igshid=1j9dgosxb8n2s
When the walking death blackens everything and the medium is buried......
LG
Dear Mr. Langemann; as a clear-thinking psychotherapist from Austria, I enjoy your refreshingly clear wit and your courage to publish like this!!!! I very much hope for a continuation and have shared the video in question very often and still have it available! Please continue... you spread confidence! THANK YOU
Best wishes to Austria.
By the way: the Langemann-Hockertz interview is back...... via re-upload
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGRdUjhODUk&feature=share
A real Langemann; thank you.
It won't be long before you receive relevant offers from the "lava lamp faction" .......
Thank you for the good contribution, you can already read annoyance and anger or disappointment out of it. But that is also legitimate in view of the facts. I work in the public sector and in the senior civil service (i.e. predominantly highly trained experts) - please do not take this sentence in a derogatory way - and I am horrified to realize that a degree, doctorate or many years of professional activity in positions of responsibility do not protect against uncritical thinking. Blind trust and unreflective obedience are also widespread here and seem to have become more deeply ingrained in our society than we are willing to admit. Objective, critical debate is often tersely spurned. Just don't produce any resistance to decisions. All processes in the public sector are discussed back and forth until the whole thing is watered down. In many areas, this leads to the well-known standstill and, as we all know, standstill is a step backwards.
I wish you continued strength and courage. There are many people who support you, at least in spirit. It should be clear to many that such work also requires financial support. I therefore try to support you with small donations and can also encourage others to do so. Thank you to everyone who does not lose heart.
You've said it, how the justice system works!
Even worse, if you take action against judges and/or public prosecutors, you will be known like a sore thumb!
Lawyers who still want clients will therefore never attack the judiciary. On the basis of Article 97 (1) of the Basic Law, but only by applying the first three words, they subsequently lose most cases before this court.
So - the clients also stay away.
Even attorneys general - I have written this three times - only quote the first three words in this sense.
Because - the judiciary has made it easy for itself when the Federal Court of Justice has just clarified that the obligation to comply with the law, as stated in the next six words, must remain subordinate. This means that only spectacular events are dealt with.
You don't hurt the judges!
Try to complain, if necessary about Mr. Steinhöfel and about freedom of opinion on the net!!!
Congratulations. For once, nomen est omen Club of Clear Words is indeed correct! I am happy to express my pleasure at your comprehensiveness. We don't always have to agree, but the way you express and position yourself is really good.
Many thanks and keep up the good work
Volker Kemeter
Volker, we don't have to agree. Exactly! Unfortunately, we have forgotten how to tolerate dissent. In a healthy democracy, this is an important building block of the democratic foundation. Another is respect for one another. Respectful greetings.
I'm not social media savvy. I conclude that there is no alternative (European) platform where you can easily publish video clips, right?
Mr. Langemann calls for the establishment of such a system.
There are German search engines, I have been using Ecosia for a long time, absolutely never Google.
Personally, I would prefer to be informed by text on factual topics. This is my appeal to you, Mr. Langemann.
I also see the persuasive power of personal appearance,
can and would like to do without it, because such forces also work in the wrong direction.
Classically, when not quite clever front personnel are convinced on factual issues and then usually to even less clever listeners/voters
in a convincingly persuasive manner. One of countless examples: Dr. Markus Söder
Dr. Schiffmann has already successfully taken legal action against the deletion of one of his videos. LG
As far as I know, the historic speech by Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg at the Corona Demo in Stuttgart on 09.05.2020 has been deleted from You tube.
After a lawsuit, the deletion was withdrawn and You tube had to pay the costs of the court proceedings and a fine.
This will work until the politicians get wind of the possibility of shutdowns and then the judiciary will follow suit.
After all, our public prosecutors are still under the yoke of politicians!
If a member of parliament instructs the public prosecutor's office to stop prosecuting a case, as he has the right to do, he may be doing his friends a good turn.
Dear Mr. Langemann,
I have been following your high-quality contributions since the beginning of the Corona madness. In the meantime, censorship (even on a platform of a major US corporation) is one of the highest possible honors you can receive as a freelance(!) journalist. At the end of the day, your spineless "colleagues" who pander to the prevailing opinion (i.e. also the opinion of those in power) work in the same way as John Swinton was dismayed to discover back in 1883:
"The business of the journalist (...) is to distort the truth, to lie bluntly, to pervert it, to vilify it, to grovel at the feet of Mammon and to sell his own country and people for his daily bread, or, what is the same, for his salary."
There are only a few who resist these mechanisms; you are one of them! Because - being aware of the consequences - you don't muzzle yourself and stand up for your values with your name. Instead of just going with the flow like a dead fish.
post on bitchute and on library and dailymotion
there it remains
greeting
fred
n o t h e r ........... there is this possibility.....
Do not let up! I appreciate your channel and your top-notch contributions!
At this time, you need backbone without end. We will not bend.
Sincerely.
As a lawyer, I would like to encourage you to take legal action against the deletion. You have a good chance of winning the case. And YouTube will then have to bear the costs, including those of your lawyer.
You speak from my soul. Have a great vacation and all the best.
Thank you Claudia. Stay in touch with me.
I take a different view of the fact that freedom of the press is not in danger. It may be that Youtoube & Co are ultimately not press portals and have the right to delete their content. Unfortunately, the problem is that the mainstream media and the right-wing media have currently abandoned their pluralism and people are forced to obtain additional information from alternative media. And these are dependent on YouTube & Co to disseminate their work. I also discovered Clubderklarenworte on YouTube. If everything that encourages people to think is deleted, what's left? For me, that's an attack on the freedom of the press. Welcome to the desired technocracy!
Nicole, the current status of your relationship with press freedom: it's complicated. Yes, that's true. But the deletions do not spell the end of the West. In addition to many problems, we probably have one major current problem: there are more people with speech bubbles than thought bubbles in this world.
Well put - and I agree with you and thank you for your clarification, which is a ray of hope in these times of rash decisions. THANK YOU!
Thank you for the intelligent and outstanding comment.
You're very welcome Uli, don't overestimate the commentator. I'm too stupid to play dumb at the right moments.
You're not too stupid - you're too honest and straightforward 🙂
Well, I'm not so sure about that myself.
But one thing I am sure of is that few things demonstrate people's stupidity more impressively than lowered SUVs.
I've been reading and sharing your site for some time now. But this comment is awesome. Anyone who doesn't actually like to think should understand it. Dear M.L., thank you for your commitment.
Hello Mr. Langemann, I think the above post is wonderful and I will share it diligently. I am not as eloquent as you, but I remain vigilant. It's good that there are critical people like you who share your thoughts with us. Thank you
Sigrun, thank you for your appreciation.
You have forgotten some other companies like Microsoft.
How about first replacing Windows with e.g. Linx
Yes, due to their immense power, these big names collect even more immense fees or parts of fees from advertisers.
The wealth does not seem to lie in the material, but in the power of these media.
Thank you for your effort and consistency, please do not give up, you are a ray of hope with your contributions and these times. Kind regards Herbert Klejna
Hello Herbert, thank you very much for your kind words.
Mr. Langemann, I could read what you write for hours and I admire your work. I come from the ex .... I don't like writing these three letters anymore, but of course you know what I mean. I worked in Adlershof for a few years, albeit in the music editorial department, but I am the daughter of a journalist and was also a freelance journalist for a long time... always in the direction of music. That doesn't have much to do with politics, but my courage was enough for me to apply to leave the country. But there is one thing I have always honed and it has not been lost on me: an unmistakable sense of betrayal. When the media in Germany switched on in March, I knew that something was being prepared here. You expose and you do it very well and you wake people up and that is very, very good. You are a light, but for it to be bright we all have to be a light, okay a small candle would be enough and then nobody can hide in the dark anymore. Unless the person or people who need to hide don't need to hide at all because nobody can stop them anyway. That's my biggest fear. But we won't give up. Stay tuned for all of us and turn on many more lights, or at least give a few tea lights to the very skeptical ones. I'll help you with that.
Well Annette, it's like this, at the end of the tunnel a hamster runs in a wheel and provides light.
That sounds like a lot of experience in terms of manipulation by the media and their leaders. This was probably more likely in the GDR, in a system that is currently being advocated by certain groups and is also to be introduced here - according to their wishes. Most journalistic restrictions in the world always exist primarily in states that have transitioned from so-called socialism to totalitarianism. The manipulation in our Germany today, which you also cite in your description, is certainly not small. You may observe that, on the one hand, basic political attitudes at management levels contribute to the pre-sorting of the next layer. In the judiciary, it is the security of the civil service, which also offers infinite cohesion when it comes to criticizing them. This is why there is no longer a separation of powers in the sense of the Basic Law.
Well - my conclusion from the posts is that due to the huge permeability of the media and accessibility to the masses, we will be dependent on the few leading figures to pre-sort opinions. The elections in the USA may have shown this, the last election to the German Bundestag could be influenced immensely by a shouter. This is the future! Only education can protect us from the excesses, but there are still too many stupid people in the world, laggards, followers and rabbits.
Let us remain vigilant!