A question of trust

Comment by Markus Langemann //

Dear Mr. Scholz,

In your speech on Wednesday evening, you confirmed that you have format - DIN A6 maximum. Small and fluttery. The teleprompters alone gave your words flow, another illusion of ability.

The formula you gave all Germans on their way into the night was: Lindner to blame. Everyone stupid. Except me.

You know, I felt ashamed of myself again, like I did for Zlatko in the first Big Brother container.

But at least he had heart and passion.

I saw an offended German chancellor sausage radioing into the night from the Berlin container. At least without a sweater.

You can't even make a grand exit, I think to myself, as the cameras lower their heads. And that's the problem. Back in September, I called out to you at this point: "Enough!" - in a great chorus of common sense.

It was unmistakable in the country, penetrating the walls of the Chancellor's building.

Now you have declared, anemic and certainly externally scripted, that you want to put the vote of confidence on January 15! Do you know the meaning of the letters WTF? Attention Scholz, not WEF!
You have long since squandered that trust.

They don't even have the backbone to ask the question directly in humility: "Do I still have the approval of the majority of MPs?" To take responsibility would be to leave.

Trust describes the expectation that others are reliable, honest and have integrity in their actions. Do you know these words? CumEx once parked. But since Nordstream 2 at the latest, you have been nothing more than a glove on Biden's American hands.

From a moral point of view, trust is an indispensable good that plays a key role in interpersonal relationships as well as in social structures. Trust is often seen as a "moral hazard", as one accepts a certain vulnerability: One cedes a kind of power to the trustworthy person in the belief that they will not abuse the trust. A breach of trust is morally considered a serious transgression because it shakes the foundation of the relationship and undermines the basis for future trust.

I don't trust you with a single meter of dirt road.

Certainly not until January 15.

There is no reason not to raise the vote of confidence immediately. You may not be able to leave, but practise decency. Perhaps with trust in God.

But you already renounced that when you took office.

Show your greatness for once.

Ask the question immediately. At least.

Share post:

9 Responses

  1. He has already forgotten that he is "Federal Chancellor", these are the advantages of need-based dementia (copyright Guy Fawkes) and heteronomy.
    He is continuing the catastrophe that began with the unspeakable Stasi Merkel and will lead Europe into the abyss.
    Anyone who votes for the traffic light, the left or Blackrockmerz is voting for the eradication of Europe.

  2. You will have to read that to him because he has forgotten how to read by now.................................otherwise he would have heard the warning about the Ukraine war, so enjoy the destruction, enjoy it

  3. Trust ? Where should that come from ?
    The SPD/Greens have only tightened up what Merkel's CDU started!
    And that is precisely why this new election will change NOTHING as long as the AfD is excluded.
    The CDU will continue as the SPD started and I bet that at least one party of the current government's incompetents will also be in the new government.
    In addition, the "Christian NATO warmongers" are leading to a further escalation with Russia, as many CDU members are members of the Atlantic Bridge, the Bilderbergers or the Trilaterals.
    Another mess of undermining basic democratic principles is in preparation - namely the banning of the AfD.

  4. If that is what Scholz and Habeck mean by respect for citizens, they are welcome to go where the CumEx business grows: https://www.welt.de/kultur/stuetzen-der-gesellschaft/article251402154/Politiker-zeigen-Buerger-an-I-fought-the-Habeck-and-I-won.html

    However, these two politicians clearly lack not only human greatness but also courage and trust in our democracy, which was once exemplary under Konrad Adenauer, Ludwig Erhard, Willy Brandt, Helmut Schmidt, Helmut Kohl and Gerhard Schröder, as well as commitment to our free and democratic basic order.

    For (human) greatness, I am happy to provide the still-Chancellor and the still-Vice-Chancellor with a stool each.

  5. is A6 small-minded? At the very least, he has neither decency nor dignity, nor has the traffic light represented the interests of the German people. From Steinmeier to Scholz to Habeck and Baerbock, Faser, Paus and Buschmann, the offices have been severely damaged by their holders. The oath of office would actually be remembered! the Show must Go on!

  6. Dear people,
    Before the final collapse of the failed government, I will make a few quick arrangements for the good of the people - but this time for real... for sure!
    Kind regards from Ollli

  7. Bravo, Mr. Langemann, there is no better way to describe the image of this pathetic man in the office of Chancellor.
    I would still like to see handcuffs clicking for everything he has said, waved through or not acted on in the last 3(4) years, in solitary confinement, just as Dr. Reiner Fuellmich has had to endure for over a year in custody, although the presumption of innocence still applies to him, but certainly not to Mr. Scholz!
    It would be very nice if you could also publish the above-mentioned case, above all it needs publicity, just like Julian Assange used to do.
    A loyal reader

  8. Exactly my/our opinion! This man and the whole green mishmash should be "expelled" because they have never represented German interests. Now Trump will probably, logically and "well-deservedly" dispose of us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to this platform for the cultivated exchange of arguments.

We have forgotten how to endure contradiction. It is okay to disagree here. I would ask you to remain respectful and polite. Insults and hate comments will be removed in future, as will calls to vote for political parties. I reserve the right to delete insulting or derogatory comments. This public forum and its inherent opportunity to exchange arguments and opinions is an attempt to uphold freedom of expression - including freedom of dissent. I would like to see the old-fashioned virtue of respect cultivated here.

"Controversy is not an annoying evil, but a necessary prerequisite for the success of democracy." Federal President Dr. h.c. Joachim Gauck (ret.), only 5 years ago in his speech on the Day of the Basic Law.

en_USEnglish