Here I am exclusively publishing a document that I consider to be of historical significance. A document that you should know, as it is a not insignificant piece of the mosaic that makes the current social situation in our country easier to understand.
Explanation:
In March 2020, I published a strategy paper, which at the time was still known as the "VS - confidential; for official use only" was classified. It was entitled: "How we get COVID-19 under control".
The strategy paper begins with the sentence: "The pandemic COVID-19 virus is the greatest challenge for politics, society and the economy in Germany since the end of the Second World War."
This 17-page document then explains what needs to be done. On page 1 it says: "Social contacts should be reduced to a minimum for a certain period of time."
The following pages use astonishingly woodcut-like, tabloid-esque vocabulary. There is talk of the German economy as a "high-performance machine", of a "meltdown" of the entire system and the "wooden hammer" that must be used to ensure social distancing.
"In order to achieve the desired shock effect, the concrete effects of an infection on human society must be made clear," it says on page 13.
The language in the extensive paper is not coherent and surprised those who became aware of the paper. At times, it is reminiscent of BILD headlines.
For an internal paper commissioned by the RKI and the Federal Ministry of the Interior, the wording often gave the impression that it was the term paper of a secondary school student or, at best, a trainee at the BMI. - You can still find the paper on the clubderklarenworte.de website under "Documents", at the bottom of the list.
In any case, the diction in the strategy paper made people suspicious. "Is it a deliberately leaked paper, was it written by several people, is it a fake?" These were already the questions at the time.
By teaming up with medical lawyer Dr. Marion Rosenke, we then received certainty here at clubderklarenworte.de in June 2020. That paper was written by several authors.
Marion Rosenke requested information about the authors of the paper from the Federal Ministry of the Interior on April 23, 2020. After around eight weeks, on June 9, 2020, the names were released. According to the paper, eight external scientists were involved. It is remarkable, if not highly surprising, that only economists and political scientists were consulted.
One of the political scientists, Dr. Maximilian Meyer, who was still working as an assistant professor of international relations at a university near Shanghai, has now listed the following main areas of research and expertise on his website at the Technical University of Munich:
"Global politics of science, innovation and technology; China studies (especially foreign, energy and environmental policy); global energy and climate policy; theories of international relations".
In a video still available on YouTube today Interview with him, he tells Phoenix:
"[...] this quarantine [...] will save lives. The isolation we need [...] can be done in the countryside, can be done in hotels. It's basically a vacation at state expense."
Why is it that only economists and political scientists are consulted for an eight-member panel of experts to draw up an internal strategy paper for the federal authority RKI, which reports to the Ministry of Health?
It's a health crisis, isn't it?
Where are the experts? Sociologists, psychologists, theologians or even constitutional lawyers? Just to name a few interdisciplinary fields that are obviously responsible.
Questions that loom large in the room like neon signs.
How did this paper really come about? What was the intention of writing it?
Now, just over a year later, there is another important building block that brings us closer to the answers.
In the course of an action for information against the Federal Republic of Germany, Dr. Rosenke received the e-mail correspondence relating to the creation of the paper. I am making this powerful PDF available to you exclusively and publicly.
Numerous pages have been completely blacked out by the RKI. The visible parts alone are revealing.
Dr. Marion Rosenke comments on selected aspects of the paper as a guest author on clubderklarenworte.de, you can read her analysis below the video.
You can download the document here.
A script of destructivism?
Guest author Dr. Marion Rosenke comments on the correspondence published here.
As part of the action for information pending before the Berlin Administrative Court under case number VG 2 K 154/20 regarding the strategy paper from March 2020 "How we can get COVID-19 under control" the Federal Ministry of the Interior has submitted a largely redacted file containing correspondence between the RKI and the BMI and unnamed "external scientists". On Thursday, 19.03.2020, 10.52 a.m., BMI State Secretary Markus Kerber wrote to Mr. Lothar Wieler (RKI) and five other unnamed professors to recruit them for an ad hoc research platform. There had already been an informal exchange beforehand. To illustrate the impetus, we quote verbatim from the email:
"... We need a model that enables us to estimate the health burden resulting from the spread of the coronavirus in Germany's health and social system in 2020. On the basis of such a model, we on the BMI side can assess, prepare and make decisions on measures and their effects. Our aim is to "get ahead of the situation" mentally and in terms of planning. We can only do this if we can "think up" future situations and plan ahead. We don't need an epidemiologically perfect model for this; plausible modeling is sufficient. At BMI, we then have to assess the economic and social effects of different stress scenarios and analyze political and administrative response scenarios and derive decision trees from them.
What do we have? How should we proceed?
In my opinion, the model developed by ... (redacted) is ideal from a political and administrative point of view, as it shows us different stress scenarios for which we can then plan preventive and repressive measures. If everyone agrees and if everyone maintains confidentiality with regard to this and all other research results that we all still have to develop, then I would like to make the RWI model the starting point for all considerations. Based on scenarios (base, best, worst?) to be jointly selected and different time frames for the crisis (3, 6, 12, 24 months?), we should then be able to present the economic and social impact.
One example: economists are considering the possibility that a shutdown lasting several months could cause a recession of over ten percent of GDP with high unemployment and a decline in capital values. Such a situation, which has never been experienced before, can raise systemic questions per se that go far beyond action within the system (keyword: from an economic stimulus program "in" the system to the transformation of "the" system through a forced economy). This is simply about economic and social sustainability and the question of when we will reach irreversible turning points in development.
We should therefore develop impact scenarios based on the RWI model. If you like, we at the Federal Ministry of the Interior are concerned with being "triage-capable" on the measures side in order to maintain internal security and the stability of public order in Germany. These are all considerations that we have to make in small groups outside of operational crisis management institutions and keep confidential.
...
.... (redacted) is a profound political scientist ... (redacted). I am still trying to ... for the social-group-psychological contribution.
How should we work?
Without thought patterns. Maximum interdisciplinarity. Without bureaucracy. Maximum courage.
...
I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart in advance. I compared the situation with Apollo 13 to my friend and neighbor Lothar Wieler. A very difficult task, but with a happy ending thanks to maximum collaboration.
HG Your MK"
This commissioned email is remarkable. It not only provides the "external scientists" with the range of measures, including repressive measures, but also the RWI model as the starting point for all considerations. From an objective point of view at such an early stage of the corona crisis, however, one would have expected a completely open question, especially since the WHO announced in autumn 2019 by means of its own study that NPIs (not pharmaceutical interventions) have no significance in containing a (there: influenza) viral spread.
https://www.heise.de/tp/features/COVID-19-WHO-Studie-findet-kaum-Belege-fuer-die-Wirksamkeit-von-Eindaemmungsmassnahmen-4706446.html
In general, it is astonishing that the RWI can apparently present a ready-made model for the political and administrative control of a corona pandemic in advance. The question arises as to whether the idea of repressive measures was implanted in the BMI via the RWI in the first place? Apparently, the ad-hoc research group also refers to the disaster plans of the Sars countries affected in 2003, as Maximilian Meyer from the School of International Studies at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China wrote to the group on 19.03.2020, 20.08 hrs:
"... The studies by Imperial College and DGEpi ... seem to me to be the gold standard at the moment in terms of Covid-19 modeling for migration and containment strategies. In our opinion, their results should be included in the scenarios.
Finally, I would like to suggest that in order to determine the strategic direction - as suggested by Mr. Kerber - it makes sense to first look at the responses of the Sars countries. They have drawn up current disaster plans based on their experience from 2003 and have practiced these for years, in the example of ... (redacted) as recently as December 2019, using the example of coronavirus. ..."
So not only was the coronavirus pandemic simulation game Event 201 staged in autumn 2019, but another coronavirus pandemic simulation game was staged in what was obviously Asia in December 2019. It is interesting to note the coincidences in the timing of a dangerous and deadly coronavirus pandemic that actually arrived in January 2020.
To ponder over the RWI model without any thought patterns, but at the same time bent over it, represents a certain contradiction in terms. The "limiting the scope" evoked by BMI State Secretary Markus Kerber can also be found in other parts of the email correspondence. For example, in an email dated 22.03.2020, 8.52 a.m., it is stated that the question of the scope of the paper arises. For example, there is no mention of the fiscal aspects on the expenditure side or the longer-term implications of a shrinking economy. In an email from the same day, 8.59 a.m., a participant writes:
"We also need to reopen schools after Easter because otherwise we will reinforce social inequality through continued homeschooling (very briefly). Learning success online etc. is very limited. Parents are becoming very important."
This prudent objection was not pursued further, as far as can be seen from the unredacted correspondence. It is clear that the collateral damage to the economy, state budget and education, which was certainly perceived and to be expected, was thus recognized but not focused on further (limiting the scope). As can be seen from the commissioned email from the BMI State Secretary Markus Kerber, the BMI is primarily interested in the tipping points (irreversible turning points). Why? On 20.03.2020, 22.52, Mr. Kerber writes that the worst case scenario must be prevented by all means. Literally: "Whatever it takes!"
One of those involved - the email dated 21.03.2020, 12.21 p.m. (page 103 of the green pagination) is worth reading - even speaks of the sledgehammer method.
And why does Mr. Kerber specify the time courses up to 24 months without obtaining infectiological-epidemiological expertise? Oh yes, the BMI is not interested in an epidemiologically perfect model, but plausible modeling is sufficient. This lays the foundation for unscientific, lacking empiricism and lacking evidence. A foundation that runs like a red thread through the entire crisis, as our everyday experience has shown for over a year now. In an email dated 23.03.2020, 6.10 p.m., BMI State Secretary Markus Kerber once again confirms the departure from evidence-based medicine:
"... Our paper was very well received by the two ... (redacted) and will now find its way into the German government's crisis cabinet thanks to its high quality and prudence. ... Because of the increasing importance of digital solutions in the fight against the pandemic (Byung Chul-Han in WELT today: "Epidemics are not defeated by epidemiologists but by computer scientists and big data"), I asked my colleague State Secretary Klaus Vitt, who is responsible for IT at the BMI, to join the group. He can "remove" many an obstacle. ..."
Incidentally, the question arises as to which persons or institutions are granted the right to award school grades in a teacher-like manner and thus indirectly influence German government business?
At least one participant in the ad hoc research group notices the lack of evidence. In an email dated 19.03.2020, 22.01, he/she points out that it would be important to question the assumptions as a first step. Some of them are simply made in order to be able to continue with the calculations. What can be said with certainty at this point is that this objection did not originate from Lothar Wieler.
In this context, reference should be made to the Infection Protection Act, according to Section 1 (2) of which the current state of medical and epidemiological science must be taken into account! In this respect, the BMI is acting contra legem!
Ultimately, the transformation process / system change mentioned in the order email of 19.03.2020 and the intended intervention in social and group psychological processes are also disconcerting. The second aspect mentioned also runs like a red thread through the - not redacted - correspondence and is illustrated by the following emails:
"... For me, a fundamental methodological problem arises: trend analyses and group-specific profiles. The question could be important when thinking about the strategies of a "flexible response" over time and regional compartmentalization. In addition, how can the effects of selective socio-economic and psychosocial emergencies be assessed in terms of their impact on isolation and "shut-down" strategies? Finally, what can be done with the group of immunized people? Can we attribute a role to them in the progress of the measures? The fundamental problem that I feel responsible for is that of affectivity and legitimacy, i.e. the population's willingness to fear and follow. I look forward to our meeting." (Email from 20.03.2020, 7.10 a.m.)
One of the many elements of psychological warfare (readiness to follow through by creating fear) is addressed here quite blatantly. They were also aware of the pandemic-limiting herd immunity and had to devise a new role for the immunized. This was also in accordance with the order email of 19.03.2020, in which BMI State Secretary Markus Kerber wrote that new situations had to be devised. In this context, the WHO's redefinition of overcoming a virus pandemic comes to mind: It is no longer the herd immunity achieved that is decisive, but the vaccination rate. So now and again, thinking ahead also means thinking away.
In addition to managing psychosocial emergencies, those involved are also creating new forms of social control:
"... Small-town communities such as in Hohenlohe have already naturally begun to combine social distancing with social control of those who have tested positive and are vulnerable. For me, this is the basis for a "clean" regulatory justification of new forms of social control. The principle of subsidiarity justifies protective measures in self-organization. ... I would have the strong impression if the Chancellor were to announce a general curfew for the country and say nothing about measures to contain the multiplicative processes of infection. Söder is intuitively right: the spreading feeling of powerlessness must be kept in check by the impression of strong state interventionism." (Email from 21.03.2020, 8.51 am)
The new forms of social control favored here mean nothing other than a call for denunciation. What was that about the biggest scoundrel in the whole country? It is also interesting to note the clairvoyant abilities of the author of this mail at this early stage of the crisis to recognize a spreading feeling of powerlessness that needs to be kept in check. The exact cause of the feeling of powerlessness is not examined in detail. And since the still incumbent Chancellor is brought up, her political anamnesis with relevant experience in agitation and propaganda immediately pops up in my brain. Once again: Coincidences do happen!
Overall, it is clear from the file that has now been submitted that these are purely theoretical models that are then to be imposed on the (economic/social) community. There is talk of the idea of presenting measures such as assembly bans as economically and medically necessary (email dated 21.03.2020, 19.21). Boris Augurzky from RWI speaks in an email dated 22.03.2020, 11.57 a.m., of the fact that one should argue from the goal. In an email dated 22.03.2020, 12.14 p.m., it says:
"... We have calibrated everything so that in the end the mortality rate per infected person is around 1.2% (without rationing). There was also the best case 2 with lower mortality."
In the unredacted emails, the inflationary use of the word strategy stands out. There is constant mention of test strategy and even exit strategy. Ah. Until when did Angela Merkel forbid the ordinary population from having discussions about the exit? Or - after more than a year of coronavirus scaremongering, it would appear - does she want to completely prevent the general public from thinking for themselves? There is also evidence of this in the documents: the German Institute for International and Security Affairs:
"... There is also already a coordinated task force in the SWP, which is thinking and planning the international dimensions (the colleagues ... (redacted) are in cc.)" (Email from 20.03.2020, 3.39 pm)
Ms. Merkel is advised to read the Infection Protection Act, which she herself has severely criticized. Section 1 (2) IfSG emphasizes the personal responsibility of each individual, which logically includes independent thinking and discernment on the basis of objective information gathering.
But even the RKI pursued its own strategy in this matter, as can be seen from an email from Lothar Wieler dated March 22, 2020, 8:00 a.m:
"Dear all, Absolutely read - that is very convincing and it reflects exactly the strategy we are pursuing at the RKI. Be sure to read it and compare it with your models. Lothar H. Wieler"
Matthias an der Heiden from the RKI writes to Lothar Wieler on 20.03.2020, 16.37, that the test strategy in particular is of great importance according to ... (redacted). However, all details of the test strategy were blacked out in the file now submitted. Why? Is there no overriding public interest in this, especially as everyone - predominantly healthy people and even children (!) - is now being formally forced to undergo testitis, mostly without cause? And what is the real purpose of the BMI's testing strategy?
To round off the picture, the email from BMI employee Hanna Katharina Müller from the Department for Political Order Systems and Hybrid Threats dated 21.03.2020, 12.29 p.m., is quoted:
"... Enclosed you will find our proposal for an outline:
1. executive summary (situation dangerous; measures can still avert worst case, further reduce social contacts, start test offensive; increase capacities of beds and oxygen, call for collective fight against virus) ...
"Worst case avoidance" as a strategic goal for Germany and the EU. ... "Siren warning" as a metaphor: loud and arriving everywhere ..."
The perfectly realized metaphor! Loud, shrill, incessant and inescapable - the declaration of war on a virus for over a year now.
Truthfulness, prudence and caution do not come across loud and shrill, but pure and gentle. Just like love, which is killed off by the instrumentalization of a natural fear of death.
English 
German 
Spanish
64 Responses
What stands out in this paper is the shirt-sleeved handling of data and facts. If you didn't know otherwise, you would assume it was the joint seminar paper of mediocre undergraduate students. However, I have read more intelligent papers in my time as an assistant at a business administration department. This paper simply speaks of the banality of stupidity & intent. A few mediocre political scientists & economists sit down with one or two state secretaries and cobble together a paper with which they determine the control of a pandemic for two years and paralyze an economy and society. That's how banal the alleged evil is!
Dear Langemann,
Thank you for publishing the paper. The linguistic incoherence of the paper that you have recognized is, in my opinion, due to the fact that the vast majority of it is back-translated from US or English. They also take this strange-looking language from EU regulations etc., which are originally written in English and then translated into German. I don't want to imply that the people involved were "just" copying, but it does read as if they were picking and choosing from several existing documents and then adapting them to Germany. Copy and paste in Gutenberg style. That would also make the brevity of the time plausible. Should someone have the time and leisure to translate the paper again, they might come across the originals, which would certainly not be uninteresting. But maybe I'm totally wrong.
Thank you for your efforts and your valuable work.
With kind regards
Decker
...one wonders with what democratic and parliamentary legitimacy this model is being implemented...not one of these experts is elected...of course the government needs external, professionally qualified advisors from various faculties...but I have not adopted the paper as my own.
When and where was it brought up for political discussion? Leaked and then forcibly published???agenda bypassing parliament...
In my view, there are two other places in the email history that are interesting:
On March 20, 2020 at 10:52 pm wrote
"Dear
Thank you very much for this model and the somewhat comforting best-case model (which, with 126,000 deaths, would correspond to a severe flu). I look forward to tomorrow's discussion. The worst case scenario clearly shows us what needs to be prevented, whatever it takes!
HG Your MK" (Note from me: probably Markus Kerber from the BMI)
1. we remember: anyone who compared Covid-19 to the flu was a trivializer. And we've probably never had 126,000 deaths in a flu epidemic before...
2. in the best-case scenario at the beginning of the PDF, the final assumption is that there will be far fewer deaths (11,777), thanks to Hammer and Dance. The corresponding measures are then also listed. But that leads me to reference 2:
19.03.2020 20:08
“…
Finally, I would like to suggest that in order to determine the strategic direction - as suggested by Mr. Kerber - it is also useful to first look at the responses of the Sars countries. Based on their experience from 2003, they have drawn up current disaster plans and practiced them for years, for example in December 2019, using the example of coronavirus (my note: Event 201?). None of them have adopted the strategy of contamination/slowdown. This raises the question for our group as to whether and how a containment scenario could be conceived for Germany. It does not seem to have been essentially a "lockdown" () that has allowed these countries to successfully control Covid-19 from a previous perspective. We believe it would be useful to discuss these arguments and strategies.
With best regards,
”
So a lockdown doesn't seem to be the method of choice... It would have been interesting to exchange arguments and strategies here.
...a strategy paper that needs to be improved in passing and does not take into account the fact that the state will lose up to 200 billion in tax revenues....
Bright minds.
Never mind - there is enough money on the market - the stock market is booming and Mr. Hüther is not (?) expecting a wave of insolvencies...
By chance, I came across some outpourings from the Great Chairman of the CCP today. In case anyone is interested. In a nutshell: "Work hard, work hard" and "Work hard" (Mister Xi Jinping, April 30, 2021)
https://ukd4iapkewq735fwm6c7an6lki-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-www-gov-cn.translate.goog/xinwen/2021-04/30/content_5604164.htm
...Unfortunately no translation from Chinese - the online portal leaves the page...
Ps.: Interesting, by the way, that towards the end of the document the planning staff portray their own activities as an Apollo 13 mission with a happy ending...?!
I just came across this site today and am delighted with the cultured exchange. Thank you very much for the article and the interpretation of the document. I was convinced from the beginning that it was a plandemic, as the statements and actions of some people (e.g. Merkel and von der Leyen, but also many others worldwide) and the time at which they were made, in my opinion, do not allow any other interpretation. Obviously also that vaccination is a main objective of the Covid staging. In my view, the unconstitutionality of the Covid measures is also undisputed due to a blatant lack of proportionality. And this brings me to the question that is also somewhat neglected in the alternative media: Why? Why all this circus? Why do we want to vaccinate everyone in the country this year at all costs, even though, rationally speaking, this vaccination represents a risk bordering on madness (also in view of the 14-year-long unsuccessful attempt to produce a vaccine against SarsCov1 without all the test animals dying the next time they came into contact with new pathogens) with extremely limited benefits? Why are these being pushed in NATO countries as if there were no tomorrow? What are the possible explanations? 1. war including biological warfare (see NATO maneuver defender Europe 21). Note the one-sided portrayal of Russia as the aggressor while largely concealing the maneuver. 2. vaccination / ID cards as a total control option - fundraising - support in the fight against climate change (which I do not want to deny here - but I personally do not believe in CO2 as the cause) 3. depopulation according to Dr. Yeadon's thesis including resource redistribution - should the SarsCov2 vaccines do what the Sarscov1 vaccines did, millions of people would be dependent on immunosuppressants, further vaccinations. The body would be open to all diseases. They might also have to be relocated, etc. There would be incredible pressure on unvaccinated people in advance... otherwise it would be obvious that it only affects vaccinated people. These are my thoughts. How to act now? How should we act if the pressure to vaccinate increases? How do you assess the question of why?
My humble opinion on your questions:
"Why do we still want to vaccinate everyone in the country this year at all costs, even though this vaccination represents a risk bordering on madness ... from a rational point of view?"
Still the simplest question. Because vaccination has been presented as the only solution since March 2020. To be precise, from March 18, 2020. The NDR podcast 16 was a single Drosten sales show on the lack of alternatives to vaccination, see
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZqcTTTVkXY
That's when the actual vaccination campaign began. Statements by von der Leyen, Merkel and, above all, Gates followed shortly afterwards. Gates: "Ultimately, we will administer the vaccine we are developing to 7 billion people." In purely linguistic terms, this was not formulated as a proposal, but as an inner certainty. It was the announcement of the implementation of a definite plan. Future tense II, if you like. And now "the thing will be done", as irrational as it is. You can't call something without an alternative for a year, announce it as a promise of salvation and then back out.
I would like to summarize your other questions. Highly subjective, of course. Just opinion, not facts.
The external image/propaganda is about health policy and increasingly also about climate policy. But these are just disguises. In reality, it is about geopolitics, about power. It is about the vision of a world government, a "new world order", a "new normality". A "Great Reset" that has unfortunately become necessary due to this damn pandemic. And it's nobody's fault. That's the propaganda. But it's not the "disease" that makes this necessary, it's the government's treatment of the disease. The lockdowns are a deliberate slash-and-burn operation. Something is being destroyed in order to create something new.
In the strategy paper, there is an inconspicuous formula according to which politicians should argue in future: 2019 = 1919 + 1929. In other words: Covid-19 is as bad as the sum of the Spanish flu and the Great Depression. Amazing that a global economic crisis could be predicted "before" the first lockdown, isn't it? We are still in the propaganda machine, especially in 1919. At some point, stage 2 of the rocket will be ignited, the Great Depression, which unfortunately now makes a "new normality" necessary. Restrictions on civil rights, expropriations, etc. "Sorry, dear people, it was the virus that got us into this mess. It was the virus that forced us to take all these steps."
To a certain extent, China is the role model, the number one economic and military challenger to the world power USA. Incidentally, a social credit system has been in place there for years. Compliant, obedient citizens are "rewarded", while critical ones are not. The same thing is happening in Germany/the Western world with regard to vaccination. Those who are good get privileges, formerly called basic rights. Transparent propaganda that unfortunately works: "No, we don't punish the critical and dissenters. We only reward the obedient." Difference? There is none. The verbal packaging is just prettier.
An intentional depopulation? As with the previous point, I don't want to believe it, but I know that there are powerful elites who have something like this in mind. Overpopulation, scarcity of resources (plus the social tensions/wars this will cause) are among the main problems of the future. I even agree with a certain Bill Gates on this. This is precisely why it scares me so much that this "good man" is doing so much for the "health of the world". A person who thinks that there are too many people on the planet wants to save as many people on the planet as possible.
Thank you for your thoughts on my questions. I see it similarly, but I am of the opinion or rather: have the fear that the vaccinations will damage the immune system and thus resistance in the population could be conspiratorially broken. You can read about it in the summary from the University of Texas from 2016: more than 25 studies over 14 years worldwide have shown that a vaccine for humans against SarsCov1 is not possible because the test animals always died the next winter or on contact with new, wild pathogens due to an overreaction of the immune system. I am largely a layman, but I am able to interpret statistics, understand and evaluate studies and also realize that animal experiments regarding Covid-19 have failed. Sarscov1 is said to be 80 percent genetically identical to SARS-CoV-2... if you then include the fact that something like this could be sold as Covid 21 and unvaccinated people could be portrayed as being at risk... I can only hope that I am wrong...
Quote: "This is precisely why it scares me so much that this "good person" is doing so much for the "health of the world". A person who thinks that there are too many people on the planet wants to save as many people on the planet as possible."
Very well recognized, full agreement.
"There would be incredible pressure on unvaccinated people in advance... "
Look around you, the pressure on the unvaccinated is increasing with each passing day!
"How do you assess the question of why?"
Years ago, Merkel repeatedly spoke of a "market-compliant democracy" instead of a social market economy... Last week, she spoke of it again, albeit in different words: "It is about a complete transformation of the economic and social order.
It is governed from above without any consideration for losses - the elderly, children, the economically weak, etc. This country is moving towards absolutism. The parliaments are already largely disempowered.
"How to act now?"
Well, basically only mass protests with clear goals will help. However, the traditional organizations for this (trade unions, political parties, social associations, churches) have been systematically hollowed out over a very long period of time. All of them are practically dependent on state funding on the one hand. And on the other hand, they are so weakly staffed (as they are corrupted in every way) that they are expected to fail completely.
And the mass media and the police are unleashed on the new organizations (with unprecedented brutality), backed up by the invention of an emergency situation with massive restrictions on fundamental rights. The courts were staffed with the "right" people in advance (Harbarth in the Federal Constitutional Court, for example), so lawsuits come to nothing and the whole thing runs smoothly...
It will be very difficult to get out of this number again.
Thank you for your assessment, which I completely agree with. The role of the trade unions and the church in particular is more than disappointing. The church, which for centuries (plague, 3rd Reich, countless upheavals) has acted with a "believe in God and everything will be fine" attitude, has now completely disappeared and made itself obsolete in such a crisis. A huge opportunity has been missed... what worries me most is the vaccination story (see my reply to Mr. Löcke), which is being pushed through with unparalleled propaganda. It was only a few weeks ago that the German government ran a multi-million dollar "Astra Zeneca is safe" campaign, supported by at least one prominent hospital director. The result is well known. Norway now officially says more deaths from Astra vaccination than from covid. Where are the consequences here? No one can say at this point how safe the vaccines are in the medium or long term... how can you be so crazy as to vaccinate even the military and police with an unsafe vaccine in such a short time? If it backfires, you're left empty-handed... it's simply madness or calculated...
Addition: regarding Norway / Astra Zenica I expressed myself too undifferentiated: it was officially stated that the risk of dying from vaccination with Astra Zenica is higher than dying from Covid-19... (according to my information)
Hi hansoloh, I'm sure many people here have already asked themselves similar questions. I think there is a rather striking line of agreement from the theses of Mr. and Mrs. Meadows in "Limits to Growth" (1972) to the Green movement, which has been pushed since then, to the climate dictatorship, which we are now heading towards with the blessing of the Federal Constitutional Court. At the time, it was predicted that overpopulation would lead to a global collapse in 100 years. This was later (2008) verified: "In June 2008, Graham Turner of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) published a study in which he compared the historical data for the years 1970 to 2000 with the scenarios of the original 1972 study. He found a high degree of agreement with the predictions of the standard scenario, which results in a global collapse in the middle of the 21st century." I find the context quite illuminating. 1972 was almost 50 years ago.
Hello Peter! Thank you for your thoughts. I also think that part of the reason is to prevent overpopulation. Although I think it's more about building up reserves of resources or resources in general (including water and grazing land). But I'm also thinking of the "great filter" theory a la if man wants to conquer the universe again, then we shouldn't waste everything "uselessly" now. Apart from that, I now have to find out what is best for my family and me. I don't think there's much time left...
Of course " hansohlow" , sorry
Many thanks to Mr. Langemann and extraordinary thanks to Dr. Rosenke,
This document proves once and for all that we have a plandemic and not a pandemic. It is almost unbelievable how fragile our democracy is that it could almost be brought down within a year by such a deliberately unlawful clique of civil servants and politicians.
The contribution of the mainstream media is evident. As is the failure of the justice system across the board.
But they won't succeed. There are plenty of people who won't be fooled into thinking they're doing something wrong.
Thank you again for your work
Dear Mr. Langemann,
For the sake of completeness, the small question from some AfD MPs on the strategy paper (Bundestag printed paper 19/18246) and, above all, the Federal Government's response to it (Bundestag printed paper 19/19459) should be made available here.
In addition, my tip is to perhaps look for the blacked-out persons in this circle, which was installed by the BMG in 2017 for "global health care".
https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/ministerium/meldungen/2017/august/internationales-beratergremium.html
In retrospect, the underlying G-20 event was also just another building block for the rising vaccine fascism...
Dear Mr. Otzen,
Dear Mr. Langemann,
Thank you very much for the great contribution.
In the photo, the head of the Bill & Melida Gates Foundation!
amazing!
Best regards
Dr. E. Hamer
Dear Mr. Otzen,
In Bundestag printed paper 19/19459, the BMI distances itself from the strategy paper by stating that it was written by external experts in an advisory capacity, but that the BMI did not adopt it as its own. Nevertheless, it appears to be both a script and a director's work...
Greetings
Thank you, Mr. Otzen. As an addendum, if you don't already know, you don't have to go back to 2017. In May 2019, the CDU/CSU organized a global health congress on the premises of the German Bundestag.
Participants/speakers included Merkel, Spahn, Drosten, Tedros (WHO), Cerell (Gates Foundation), Farrar (Welcome Trust).
Conspiracy source is the CDU homepage, see
https://www.cducsu.de/veranstaltungen/globale-gesundheit-staerken-un-nachhaltigkeitsziel-umsetzen
In the AfD's question, the number of the printed matter has been transposed. It is printed matter 19/18426 (and not 19/18246).
Here is the link to the request and answer: http://dipbt.bundestag.de/extrakt/ba/WP19/2609/260954.html
The head of the advisory committee, Ms. Kickbusch, appears to be using the contacts she made at the WHO through her consulting firm and was also awarded the Federal Cross of Merit.
It is also worth taking a closer look at the various documents of this committee. Among other things, Ms. Kickbusch described federalism as one of the obstacles on Germany's path to becoming one of the leading countries in global health issues.
Thank you, Dr. Rosenke, thank you, Mr. Langemann.
When you read the correspondence, you think: "great, it's going exactly according to plan"...or also: reality is probably being bent a little to fit the plan. Which is why the actual reference to reality is desperately sought. (antifactual...) Every plan-act-do-check model requires an effectiveness check and reality adjustment...It is commendable that managers want to overcome the crisis...unfortunately, the desired main effect (due to a lack of technical expertise from other disciplines) tends to be missed and the undesirable side effects predominate...For how much longer?
With B. Brecht: "Yes, make only one plan, be only one big light - and make a second plan - they both don't work."...
We have a real problem, not a planned one - and we will never be able to deal with it if we turn denunciation, division, dogmatism and fear into a solution. The gentlemen and ladies see that too - but ultimately recommend exactly that...
Thank you very much Mr. Langemann !
Thank you, Ms. Rosenke!
Abraham Lincoln said:
You can lie to a certain group of people for a lifetime,
but all people only for a certain time.
Dear Dr. Rosenke, thank you very much for your valuable analysis of the material, which I would otherwise almost have regarded as the usual processing of a topic in the group. We are obviously caught in a net that has been very skillfully and meticulously prepared with all the international events such as Event 201 and the December 2019 exercise. If I then add the many redactions across almost a third of the paper, I can't even imagine what else is planned for the population. But (almost) everyone is taking part, wearing their masks even in the open air and merrily denouncing their neighbors ... Press representatives, administrative officials, police officers, the military, judges, medical officers, etc. are all "just doing their job". The strategy works! Here is the space to lament this and to do a little mourning work. Many thanks to you, Mr. Langemann, for making this space available.
After the dis dance into May, the following becomes increasingly clear. Elections are coming up. The heads of the top puppets will be reshuffled. But the rotten brood in the Bundestag will remain. They will continue to bungle, haggle, lie to and deceive the people. The economy is being blocked in many areas until it deliberately grinds to a halt and the economic experts are still talking about the expected low growth. So don't panic. Which mass of the population should and can pay for the damage that has already occurred and is still to be expected with taxes? Once the impending waves of bankruptcies start rolling in.
If the current politically-covered delay in filing for bankruptcy is suddenly deemed to be criminal activity due to a lack of cover, then the bankruptcy petition will follow.
How many will unexpectedly slip into unemployment as a result of short-time work (Hartz Deluxe)?
People are hoping for easing, for early travel, for vaccination appointments and are losing sight of the fundamental necessities that keep the system running.
Things are bound to come crashing down in the near future with no ifs, ands or buts. The seemingly big picture behind it seems almost incomprehensible, and you don't want to surrender yourself to such thoughts. What remains is the feeling of powerlessness, of ending up as a worthless player and incompetent politician with boundless fantasies of omnipotence.
It's nice that we now know all this in detail and can sleep a little worse. The really important question is probably: Will the hustle and bustle come to an end soon or will it continue?
Excellent work!
However, as long as the majority of people are stuck in the mainstream filter bubble, this research will not change anything for the masses! They are hushed up in the mainstream.
Therefore the call to everyone to share this information in their own environment! Use Whatsapp Status, for example, to burst the mainstream filter bubble!
How is the incidence value actually calculated?
The figure is intended to make the incidence of infection regionally comparable and show whether work bans, forced lockdowns and the destruction of the economy can continue. The calculation only requires addition, multiplication, division, rule of three and a bit of fraud with a good shot of criminal energy.
Andy Geisler
It drives me crazy that you can prove the imbecility of the incidence value with middle-school math and no lead(d) medium does it. The fact that this incidence value is based on an extremely dubious PCR test adds to this.
Number of positive tests per 100,000 within a week equals incidence value. Any teenager of average intelligence will be able to understand that the number of tests is important, which unfortunately varies greatly from region to region and that the incidence value can be artificially increased by massively increasing the number of tests. A positive rate, a percentage value, would be important. Absolute figures are garbage in medical statistics and the incidence value is ultimately an absolute value. If I go into the forest with the whole family all day and look for mushrooms, I will find more than if I do it alone and only for an hour. But that says nothing about how many mushrooms there are in the forest.
Another "scandal" was added yesterday at the BPK. Even the mainstream has noticed. US soldiers stationed in Germany and asylum seekers who have not yet been naturalized are not statistically "part of the 100,000" because they are not German citizens. However, the positive tests are still included in the incidence figure. In other words: The incidence value is partly not based on 100,000 people, but on far more, which is a further manipulation.
Seibert and co have evaded the issue and have not even understood the problem.
"Number of positive tests per 100,000 within one week equals incidence value."
This is the version of the incidence value that the government and co. are selling us. And this definition can be used to manipulate any result.
"In epidemiology and medical statistics, incidence refers to the relative frequency of events - especially new cases of disease - in a population or group of people within a certain period of time."
The decisive factor here is that the group of people is precisely defined. I.e. not 100,000 across the board, but Meier, Müller, Schulze ... excluding multiple testing, false positives and other measurements that distort the data...
I know. It was meant to be an ironic rendition of the RKI definition, Borsalino. Sorry if that was misleadingly worded by me.
In March last year, Prof. Gerd Bosbach, mathematician and one of the most renowned German health statisticians, called for the following: Representative testing in a cross-section of the population and then a regular repetition of these representative tests. Similar to what election research institutes do with the Sunday poll. This would have made it possible to collect valid data on infectiousness, development and mortality. There was actually once a critical question during the daily PKs at the beginning that went in this direction. Wieler's succinct answer? "We don't think that's the right approach." Demand? Unfortunately, none.
Incidentally, Bosbach mockingly said of Wieler: "I'd like to take the camera and microphone away from scientists like that."
Mr. Löcke, everything is fine. I'm sure you and I have no differences of opinion. Your comments speak for themselves.
Have a nice rest of Sunday.
Hello Peter, I have been researching the public figures since the beginning of this strange scenario using the example of the federal states and the intensive care beds page, as well as the % calculator. I take the so-called infected people from the intensive care units (the really sick) who are not allowed to be called that because it is not correct and the test, no matter which one, must not be used for diagnostic purposes. So I take the really sick people of the federal states mentioned by the doctors or whoever and take the population of the respective state and calculate the percentage (I think that would be correct).
Because you should never have declared a pandemic like that. Tested people are not infected people and the test(s) show all kinds of things - just take an interest in what the manufacturers write.
And when I see the death toll and the saying all corona dead ! Where are all the others? Flu, influenza, cancer, suicide, cardiovascular disease and all the rest. Even if you look at the statistics (the public ones) we have no excess mortality. So what is politics playing at ?
Instead of the incidence value, there is also an RKI method for early warning of respiratory diseases that has been tried and tested for over 10 years.
The Influenza AGI working group of the RKI operates a sentinel program. For this purpose, cooperating medical practices and some hospitals send in swabs from patients who have consulted a doctor with symptoms.
These swabs are tested for viruses capable of replication by culturing (as prescribed by the IfSG).
The results of the sentinel program are published in weekly reports during the influenza season.
This also happened at the beginning of 2020. The number of Covid cases detected was in the single digits.
The sentinel program concentrates on patients with the disease. The number of smears is very low (should be around 2,000).
However, it was possible to predict whether the healthcare system would be hit by a wave of disease and this has proven itself in practice over the past 10 years.
It is probably no coincidence that this program is no longer observed.
The incidence value
is the instrument of the corona conspiracy to manipulate the crisis in order to keep the lockdown in place for as long as possible.
Lockdown as an instrument of blackmail with the ultimate aim of "redeeming the people" while accepting a dystopia along the lines of the WEF and the BMU/BMI (see China) - and also - as has long since happened - for a totalitarian takeover.
For this reason, the framing report of the highest veterinarian for the RKI neither provides a quotient for the number of negative tests nor a statement on the ct value.
This is unlawful, but in the meantime, jurisdiction in Germany has been practically abolished by bringing all institutions into line, right up to the chairman of the Federal Constitutional Court.
The incidence value must be made verifiable for the public:
It must be required: No Pos test numbers without indication of the corresponding total test numbers.
If the federal government - i.e. the RKI - has nothing to hide, there can be no problem.
But then it loses its ability to manipulate.
If it refuses to disclose the quota, including the negative tests, this should also make the "loyalists" prick up their ears.
But in the meantime, Prof. Stephan Harbarth (head of the Federal Constitutional Court) - CDU MP and Merkel's loyalist until 2018 - has already been
has become active and has installed a jurisdiction for the "future" as well as an ineffectiveness of relevant anti-mass action constitutional suits,
so that the climate issue is now also being used to maintain the desired lockdowns.
Clearly - anyone who can should emigrate . .
Dear Mr. Geisler,
Enclosed is the lexical definition of "incidence" - to be found in the Pschyrembel under (2) and the case definition of the RKI - (1) uncommented.
1
https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Falldefinition.html
2
- Incidence (epidemiology), the number of new cases within a group of people and a certain period of time
Incidence
more articles
- Public health, hygiene, occupational medicine, medical economics, QM
- Epidemiology and demography
- Epidemiology
Incidence
- Feminine, singular
- Synonym: Incidence
- English: incidence
- Origin of term: Incidence
FeedbackEpidemiological measure for characterizing the incidence of disease in a specific population, specifically for the occurrence of a disease or a characteristic (e.g. ADR) during a specific period of time.
ClassificationFeedback
- So-called absolute incidence: number of new cases of a certain disease within a certain period of time
- Incidence rate (relative incidence): Quotient of the number of people with new cases of a particular disease/disorder and the average risk population in the observation period, often estimated by the risk population at the middle of the observation period
- Cumulative incidence: probability that an individual in the risk population falls ill or experiences the investigated event during the observation period
- Cumulative incidence rate: number of diseased individuals in relation to the risk population at the start of observation, used in prospective studies
- Incidence density: Number of incidence cases in relation to the time spent before the disease/event in the population at risk or the individual time at risk.
If the average duration of a disease in a population is known, the prevalence can also be estimated from the incidence and vice versa.
Feedback on the article
Authors / last editors: Ulrich Otto Mueller; Pschyrembel editorial office
Last update of this article: 04.2016
Publication: Pschyrembel online
Article category: Non-clinical medicine
The email conversation included and documented here concerns only a few days in the run-up to the publication of this BMI work of art. How many more such enlightening conversations may still be slumbering in the servers and filing cabinets of the Chancellery, BMI, Ministry of Health, RKI, NGOs etc., accumulated to this day? We finally need a special investigative team with extensive powers to kick down the doors of the authorities etc. if necessary and drag all the machinations into the light of day.
Mr. Langemann, your work is priceless. I had suspected it from the beginning and yet...there were tiny little doubts and now...certainty. Everything has already been said. I can only express my own bewilderment here.
It's frightening how the people and our tax money are being treated here. It looks to me as if we are only governed by ...sick people in politics. How can these people sleep, face their family and friends? Or do they feel they are something better, because they are the insiders and can exercise unbridled power over the people? And did I get it right that the paper is available to all the major media and they are silently passing on the narratives they want? At least there we have the opportunity to show them what we think of their behavior.
Once again, Germany has produced some very unempathetic creatures!!! A revision of the genes is urgently needed here.
But it doesn't help to fall into a state of shock. What are our options for action? What are our next steps?
And finally, the most important thing - many thanks to Dr. Rosenke and to you, Mr. Langemann.
I think you hit the nail on the head with your comments. I read - I recognize my assessment confirmed - alone, where is the connection to the big picture and the whole. Who or what holds the systemic action of the organs together? What or who is really pulling the strings and what is the concrete goal? The outcome is clear to me - the why is not (yet). Nonetheless - keep up the good work, we are still a long way from seeing the big picture.
On Fri, 23.04.2013, 18:42, I received the following text message on my smartphone after entering the country from Poland:
"The federal government: Welcome! Please follow the rules on tests/quarantine; pleasefollow the rules on tests/quarantine: https://bmg.bund.de/covid19”
My answer on Sat, 24.04.2021, 07:13 a.m. also by SMS:
"Dear Federal Government, dear Mr. Spahn,
Please read and heed the advice of your citizens (note: this refers to my letter, the original text of which I published here in the blog "When German politics suddenly gets a face ..." and which refers to untenable and well-documented conditions in Polish test centers). They are not your loyal wards and are responsible for their own health. If they maintain this corona terror in the open air, deliberately disregarding the findings of aerosol researchers, probably in order to create the conditions for the great transformation announced by Angela Merkel (note: meaning the "....... transformation of our entire way of life and economy"). (original quote from Merkel), to combat the CO2 crisis - see ZDF-19:00-Heute-News from 22.04.2021), i.e. to create fearful and humiliated citizens who will eventually accept everything, then you should have the courage to communicate this openly. The slightly more intelligent citizens know this anyway. Your behavior is too foolish, treacherous and unambiguous. The worst thing about this issue, however, is that you do not understand how you are being deceived by the IPCC. If you don't understand what I mean, please ask climate scientist and senior Max Planck meteorologist Bjorn Stevens. He can explain to you in detail what I mean.
Many thanks in advance.
Yours sincerely
Dr. Roland Aßmann"
And in another text message at 7:33:
"P.S.: You can also read the facts in the Club der klaren Worte on the Annalena and Armin blog, including the original statement by Bjorn Stevens in response to my question as to why Stilling, i.e. the global terrestrial (note: terrestrial = over land) decrease in wind and thus also in evaporation, does not appear in any IPCC diagram. And this despite the fact that even basic knowledge of physics is sufficient to estimate that this effect easily has the potential to explain climate change and correlates better with climate change in terms of time and geography."
Dear Mr. Aßmann
my respect for your written
Good morning, Mr. Langemann,
To put it succinctly, this pamphlet sends shivers down my spine. It should also be noted that significant parts of the pamphlet have been deliberately blacked out, as one might expect with "maximum transparency" and "no objections to disclosure"! I have to be very careful not to articulate too clearly what I think of the figures involved, whether initiators or followers.
Although we are entering the "merry month" of May today, dark times are looming in this "political weather" if we take a clear-headed look at the damage that has already been done to society in every respect.
I strongly assume that Klaus Schwab from the WEF and his dedicated team are quite satisfied with the developments towards the Great Reset.
Things are running like clockwork, so to speak, the course has been set and is only being readjusted here and there to give the middle finger to people who still think for themselves.
I would like to convince myself that hope dies last, but in this scandalous and unscrupulous scenario I find this increasingly difficult - and I'm sure it's not just me.
However, many thanks to you and your indispensable journalistic diligence as a source of information, and also many thanks to Dr. Marion Rosenke, whose efforts have made it possible to look behind these machinations, which are deliberately withheld from the people.
Thank you Mr. Langemann for your clarification, all this only confirms that I did not believe in this (so-called pandemic) from the beginning.
Please keep it up, there are hardly any people of your stature left.
This paper, which is over 200 pages long, pulls the rug out from under my feet.
Even mortality rates were planned in the model.
Outrageous!
The bombshell has to burst now at the latest!
The people who believe this whole scam don't want to hear about it. In this respect, I personally have given up with
to talk to people about it.
I am still trying to differentiate. I continue to talk to people who are still willing to talk and listen. In my opinion, hopeless cases are only those who don't WANT to know anything anymore.
Hello Mr. Langemann .
First of all, thank you for your factual discourse on Covid-19. I myself have been living abroad for 2 years. I am deeply shocked by the way this topic is treated in Germany. It seems that everything is being turned into a kind of religion. Along the lines of "If you don't understand it, at least believe it. Everything else is "right-wing" . It's a cruel world .
Many thanks, dear Mr. Langemann, for your questioning and critical journalism with a lot of depth. Super!
This is the "Fourth Estate". Please keep it up....Like before 🙂
A strategy paper written exclusively by economists and political scientists....
Mortality is already certain.....
Adjust the number of tests so that the number of cases "fits" ....
Follow-up readiness through fear.....
Corona pandemic simulation game in October 2019. Two months later, the virus "starts" - coincidence?
Book recommendation: "Chronicle of a crisis foretold: How a virus could change the world." - Paul Schreyer
"Mortality is already certain."
That was one of the things that made me suspicious of the pandemic scaremongering from day one.
Lethality and infectiousness were the only topics at the beginning. We are facing something that has a much higher lethality and infectiousness than influenza, i.e. something that is more deadly and more contagious. According to the RKI. This was formulated by the RKI as a thesis, not as a hypothesis, for a supposedly completely new disease, a phenomenon that was sold as harmless just a short time before.
Subsequently, everything was done to avoid answering questions about lethality and infectiousness. Preventing autopsies is just one example.
When Streeck conducted his own "field research" in the Gangelt/Heinsberg "hotspot" and provided reliable data instead of Nostradamus forecasts on the PC, what happened? Gratitude? No, the opposite. He was sharply attacked by Wieler, Drosten and associated media. The lethality rate of around 0.3, which Streeck found to be "evidence-based" at the time, unfortunately matched the officially predicted horror mortality rates, which were much higher.
When the pathologist Püschel was finally allowed to perform an autopsy and he stated in his first sober statements that all those he examined suffered from at least one serious underlying disease and that these people with an average age of over 80 would unfortunately have died anyway or in a timely manner, what happened? Like Streeck, Püschel was massively attacked by the media as a trivializer.
Yes, that's exactly how it was. I agree with everything you said. I am gripped by a feeling of powerlessness! What can we do? We are all being paraded here, forced to come to terms with the one-sided opinions of those in power. As soon as we question something even in our thoughts, we are pushed into the right-wing corner. And I am not a prophet when I say that this will get much worse under RRG. So the outlook for May 1st is bleak. To all of you who have your hearts in the right place, as the saying goes and has nothing to do with the right, have a nice weekend.
I refuse to be brainwashed into thinking that I have to differentiate myself from the "right". If these terms make any political sense at all, then "right-wing" is just as legitimate as "left-wing". Criminal law can be used against extremists on both sides.
... and both have since fallen over for different reasons and are now in line.
But, as they often do, they were right and would still be right today if they were to defend it
Hm.
Streeck calculated an IFR of 0.37%.
The RKI assumed 0.56% lethality in its model study (20.3.2020).
0.37% is ok? Harmless?
0.56% is what you call a horror mortality rate?
Dear Mr. Langemann,
Thank you very much for your excellent work! YES, a truly historic document!
I am stunned and angry. Even if you suspected it, finding it confirmed in documents has a completely different effect.
I have not yet read the document in its entirety. But what I read reminded me of the documents from German ministries in which the "Jewish question" was planned systematically and with German thoroughness. These plans were also meticulously implemented later...
One should not give up hope. Publications like this give people one! On the one hand.
On the other hand, documents such as these also show that those in power are fully committed to "victory", regardless of what they understand by this. There was clearly never even a hint of a health threat!
The political rulers - as well as their lackeys in the many ministries - seem to have obviously broken all emotional and other bridges to the ruled. In other words, there is no turning back for these "people"! The only thing left for them to do is to see what they have started through to the bitter end so that they themselves are not called to account ...
Let us hope that people will finally begin to understand what is going on here and start to act. Because no one in their right mind can want this bitter end.
It is inevitably becoming more difficult every day to adhere to the chaotic requirements. This information today and also the press conference Spahn, Wieler and an eloquent intensive care nurse were again the icing on the cake today
The opposite of democracy is not "dictatorship", but bureaucracy.
Democracy is, nominally, the rule of the majority (not necessarily identical with the "people").
"Bureaucracy" is the rule of unelected apparatchiks and functionaries. Since they don't have to be elected, they don't have to fear being voted out of office if their decisions turn out to be bullshit.
And the politicians who thought these drafts were great don't have to worry about being voted out of office. Whether it's Merkel or Bärbock, the end result is exactly the same. And the "independent" press is an integral part of this big, happy family! Well then, cheers!
Summary?
1) The BMI, in cooperation with the RKI, commissioned a Covid strategy paper in March 2020. In particular, the planned communication strategy (aka public relations/propaganda), which is designed to create fear and panic, is scandalous. The paper is available to all major media outlets. They allow themselves to be instrumentalized. Instead of denouncing this "desired shock effect", they act as agents of the state. Until today.
2) A courageous lawyer (thank you, Ms. Rosenke) goes into litigation, wants to know how this scandalous paper came about, who commissioned it, who the authors are, etc. She wins this lawsuit. She wins this legal dispute, after all, Germany has the Information Act, which obliges public authorities to do so.
3) BMI/RKI are thus forced to hand over the email traffic etc. Large parts are blacked out. In the BMI cover letter of the linked pdf I can read that the BMI "naturally has no objections to the disclosure" and expressly welcomes this disclosure. The BMI supports "maximum transparency".
Phew. That's all my eyes can take today.
Thank you for your work, Mr. Langemann.