from Markus Langemann
The publisher Markus J. Karsten has published an interview with the political scientist Prof. Ulrike Guérot on the occasion of the publication of her current book „Wer schweigt, stimmt zu“ geführt. Das Interview ist auch deshalb interessant, weil es unmittelbar vor dem Auftritt von Guérot in der Sendung „Markus Lanz“ im ZDF on June 2, 2022 was conducted. In that programme, Guérot faced a presenter who criticized her harshly and agitatively. If you would like to get an idea of Ms. Guérot's positions and impulses on the issues of our time, we recommend this cultivated exchange of ideas lasting just under sixty minutes. We present this interview here available in the media library.
English 
German 
Spanish
9 Responses
„Es wird versucht, mit dem Argument, der ist politisch rechts, Menschen de facto zu Fall zu bringen.“
Na und? Langsam sollte man sie doch mit der einzigen „Waffe“, die sie noch haben, zurückschlagen können:
„Ihr bezeichnet mich als „rechts“? Dann erklärt mir doch mal, was das ist und was daran so schlimm sein soll? Solange nichts kommt, fasse ich das höchstens als Auszeichnung auf.“
Many thanks for the interview, very interesting. Unfortunately, the causes that have led to the monopolization of media and science were not addressed. Did Ms. Guerot herself contribute to this in her mentioned think tanks?
It fills me with a certain schadenfreude that this darling of the left-wing, EU-cheering establishment is now suddenly experiencing her disinhibited comrades in the same way as us evil conservatives in the political center. (Mrs. Guerot would certainly still not exchange a word with the avengers, let alone seriously discuss the matter).
The positive thing is that it is never too late to become wiser. The fact that it was initially the coronavirus policy that made Ms. Guerot aware of the crypto-fascist core of EU policy and the Western state-media complex is, in my opinion, more of a coincidence. This core has so far been most evident in the handling of corona.
Die mediale Gleichschaltung anlässlich des russischen Krieg gegen die Ukraine hat Frau Guerot richtig als Ausprägung des gleichen totalitären Anspruchs der „Eliten“ (- ihrer früheren WeggenossInnen) erkannt, es könnte auch ein Klima- oder Rassenthema sein, an Hand dessen Herrschaft ausgeübt wird.
These public state broadcasters are not even close to what they represent. The subterranean intellectual level of these channels has become the order of the day. Anyone who still takes these stations seriously should ask themselves what kind of information they have received in the last two years without even beginning to question it? Anyone who sees their job as a journalist as reporting everything that a small section of corrupt psychopaths want should look for a new job as soon as possible. How can you look your relatives in the eye with so many lies every day? That there is a small section of barbarians who think they can change the world in their favor is nothing new. But there are now thousands of scientific experts, lawyers, doctors and politicians who no longer go along with this disgusting barbarism against humanity. I can see in my environment how opinions are changing. Unfortunately, it is now degenerating into hatred against German politics, especially against this green rabble. It's unbelievable how people change their minds so often within months. It's time for everyone to stand up and demonstrate against this perfidious and disgusting reporting. Away with the compulsory fees.
Dear Mr. Langemann,
Thank you very much for this informative interview, which provided a further, very personal view of Prof. Guérot.
I do not agree with Prof. Guérot on all points, especially when it comes to European policy. But the way this lady is now being torn apart and attempts are being made to rob her of her reputation on the basis of her clear common sense, her incredible knowledge and her absolutely outstanding and easy-to-understand rhetoric, by people who can't even come close to holding a candle to her, is simply subterranean and has no basis whatsoever.
At the present time, open discourse is obviously no longer possible. A discourse above all about aspects that I may not agree with, but which I should nevertheless listen to. Only then, by understanding the aspects of others, can I form an opinion. This moral narrowing of the scope for debate can be observed in many areas of our society and in many current and highly topical issues and, in my opinion, is very worrying.
I wish Prof. Guérot continued good nerves!
I admire Ulrike Guerot as a character. But that is the surface of what is observed. The deeper and more painful question should be why one MUST be a strong person to get through to others without being insulted, vilified and marginalized- The intolerance that dresses as tolerance is, in my opinion, THE social, ideological disease of immaturity of our politically passive society for decades. Thank you for today and don't miss out on being healthy, lively and JOURNALIST. Respect! E. Henneberg
Very well formulated. Thank you for that.
Ms. Ulrike Guérot also argues, in contrast to the very strange state-loyal supporters of the agenda for the social credit system, as a free-thinking person, but also burdened with the payer hypnosis from the 19th century! Even your arguments can only be partially correct, because if the basics are wrong or not understood, what is said can never be right!
After his retirement, a former CEO of a Swiss bank suddenly woke up from the hypnosis of the hypnotists from his family, supervised education and legislators. In retrospect to his activities, he recognized the machinations promptly and then realized with a clear mind that we are living on the modeled breeding ground of LUG and TRUG. In this globally organized crime, the people are, on the one hand, classified as materialistic beings by the artificial medicine of the Rockefeller Foundation and, on the other hand, modeled as payers by the sect of economics, causally related to the fiduciary mandate of money source administration to commercial enterprises! Both business model specifications are approved by the judiciary with modeled fraud laws up to the constitution. People walk around as hypnotized phantoms! The judiciary should ensure law and order, but it turns out to be the most important fence of the elite! The frauds committed more than 250 years ago are now catching up with us. But the future always begins in the present!
https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2022/05/15/ehemaliger-geschaeftsleitungs-vorstand-einer-schweizer-bank-packt-aus-gelderzeugung-treuhandfunktion-und-staat/
https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2022/05/24/ehemaliger-geschaeftsleitungs-vorstand-einer-schweizer-bank-packt-aus-teil-ii-gelderzeugung-irrglaube/
Please wake up from the hypnosis of deliberately laid false doctrines, because the path to the social credit system must be thwarted. We would have neither poverty nor existential struggles worldwide, the elite organizations such as the IMF, World Bank, BIS and WHO would not be in this position of power. Neither the interest rate game nor the self-dealing game, neither tax nor pension games, would exist because we would have a society and economy with competence in all areas, including local education.
What was done to Ms. Guerot in the Lanz show was, in our opinion, the bottom drawer!
This is actually representative of the public TV stations and the print media.
ARD and ZDF have long been taboo. We need neither re-education nor adapted reporting.
Haben diese „mediale Hinrichtung“ in einem YouTube Beitrag gesehen.
Mrs. Guerot deserves the utmost respect!