by Markus Langemann //
In an interview with the lawyer Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab, conducted by Epoch Times, the so-called RKI files and their implications are discussed from a legal perspective. Schwab holds the Chair of Civil Law, Procedural and Corporate Law at the University of Biefeld.
Further information on the legal system in Germany, in the critical view of Schwab, you will hear in this detailed interview from August 2021, in which he provides information and insights into the legal system in Germany.
You will learn more about the mechanisms and dependencies in the legal system.
Schwab comments on the current legal issues surrounding the RKI files in the Epoch Times interview summarized as follows:
Exposed documents and their significance: Schwab explains that the RKI files are internal consultation protocols of the Robert Koch Institute, the publication of which was originally intended to be prevented. Some of the minutes were made public through the lawsuit filed by the online magazine "Multipolar", albeit with redacted passages. Schwab emphasizes the importance of full disclosure of these documents for transparency and public education.
Comparison with the USA and application of the Freedom of Information Act: Schwab draws parallels with the USA, where similar documents had to be published more quickly, and explains the role of the Freedom of Information Act in Germany, which grants citizens access to information from public authorities.
Secrecy vs. freedom of information:
He criticizes the attempts to keep the RKI files secret by invoking the protection of public interests or personal rights of third parties. Schwab argues that the real intention behind the secrecy is to protect the government from the consequences of uncovering falsehoods.
Criticism of the scientific narrative of the pandemic: Schwab claims that the pandemic measures were falsely presented as being based on scientific advice, when in reality they were based on political decisions that were not scientifically sound.
Propaganda and media failure: He accuses the media of having failed in the pandemic by spreading propaganda and criticizes in particular the role of Health Minister Lauterbach and the portrayal of "Multipolar" as a right-wing medium.
Future legal consequencesSchwab sees the possibility that the RKI files could initiate a trend reversal in case law regarding the legitimacy of the corona measures. He calls for a review of the measures and a revision of the penalties and fines imposed, based on the newly available evidence.
Call to lawyersSchwab concludes by appealing to lawyers to courageously face up to the challenges and drive forward the educational work regarding the RKI files. He emphasizes the need for an intensified legal debate on the measures taken during the pandemic.
In summary, Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab criticizes the secrecy of the RKI files in the interview, questions the scientific basis of the pandemic measures and calls for a legal reassessment of these measures based on the uncovered documents.
English 
German 
Spanish
5 Responses
Unfortunately, there are too few lawyers of the caliber of Martin Schwab. Most of them don't want to know exactly when only their personal
and, above all, financial well-being is guaranteed. In this respect they are like doctors, who should have known better but followed the money trail, unfortunately the majority. Or journalists, very few of whom still have anything like professional honor. Howling with the wolves has been the order of the day in recent years.
I therefore share Dr. Gunther Frank's view that a real reappraisal will only be possible if those responsible are brought to justice. Perhaps the disclosure of the RKI files will open up new possibilities.
it was about PREVENTION
illness, HEALTH, prevention
"Those who remain silent join in." (Ulrike Guerot). Our Schwab did not remain silent, quite the opposite. Many other lawyers crawled deep into the authorities' buttocks, knowing full well that not everything was quite so kosher. Only a few judges questioned this breach of the law and were treated like criminals as a result. Our head of state campaigned for the vaccination of children and young people in schools without any evidence. He marginalized and demonized those who opposed vaccination and exposed them as deniers of a non-existent truth. According to him, twenty percent were inferior citizens. And now this, the corona bomb is bursting right under the noses of all conspiracy practitioners. They will have to fear that forgiving and forgetting without admitting guilt and actively making amends, if at all possible, will not be so easy. Those who have always disbelieved in the narrative of fear and have not participated will not be the problem. Those who have believed and whose relatives have died or fallen ill as a result of mRNA gene therapy will demand clarification and atonement - also from the vaccinators. When people realize how great the damage really is, things will get uncomfortable. That is certain.
„…der Aufdeckung von Unwahrheiten…“ Mir ist aufgefallen, das immer öfter die Rede von Unwahrheiten ist. Da klingt verharmlosend. Eine Lüge ist eine Lüge und sollte nicht anders benannt werden.
When I think of Schwab's namesake, the founder of the WEF, and his homepage, I think of lines to be read about a virus. He was praised as the catalyst for a society in need of transformation. A so-called Covid Action Platform pointed unmistakably to far-reaching changes and their control by means of so-called local governments. I wish Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab and his colleagues the best of luck.