Fertility complications and pregnancy after vaccination

by Dr. Johanna Weber

Against the background of the generally known German age pyramid, which unfortunately has a gyroscopic shape, the German government claims the following on its website: The novel corona vaccines would not make people infertile, as spike proteins would not bind to proteins in the placenta, nor would the antibody level have anything to do with fertility. In men in particular, fertility is reduced after a corona infection, but not after vaccination [1]. There would also be no risk for breastfeeding mothers, whereby infants would absorb vaccine components with breast milk, but any mRNA components absorbed would be quickly broken down by the child. Whether the antibodies ingested with breast milk protect the child from SARS-CoV-2 is currently unclear [20]. The fact checker Mimikama comes to a similar conclusion [21].

However, it is clear that the German government is only focusing on the effects of spike proteins on the placenta and the effects of antibody levels and corona infection on fertility, while completely ignoring the empirical data on lower birth rates and scientific studies on the effects of mRNA components or antibodies on babies. Only the general reports of the Paul Ehrlich Institute are cited, Mimikama even relies on non-evidence-based recommendations of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) [2].

First of all, it should be noted that birth rates have fallen massively in various countries, for example in Sweden by ten and in Germany by 14 % [2, 3]; other countries, such as Australia, are also affected [4, 5]. Doctors are also concerned about the lack of long-term studies on the vaccination of pregnant women [6]. In connection with the novel coronavirus vaccines, more irregularities in the female cycle have been recorded [7], and male fertility is also decreasing, contrary to the claims of the German government [8, 9]. Even if the placenta is not damaged by spike proteins and the level of antibodies against coronaviruses has nothing to do with fertility [1], it is still possible that antibodies against pregnancy hormones are formed with some vaccines [10, 11]. So far, however, the study situation on this topic is rather sparse.

There are also irregularities with regard to mortality in newborns [18] and fetuses [12, 13, 14]. Although this is repeatedly denied, as there have been studies to the contrary [1], according to an article by reitschuster.de, the selection criteria for the test subjects in one of these studies were problematic [15, 16]. A spontaneous abortion is defined in the study [16] as an abortion before the 20th week of pregnancy. However, according to the study, many of the test subjects were not vaccinated and included in the study until the third trimester, i.e. well after the 20th week, and were therefore unable to report an abortion before the 20th week. According to reitschuster.de, the rate of spontaneous abortions among pregnant women vaccinated in the early stages of pregnancy is over 80 % [15, 16] if the statistics are adjusted for the late enrolled test subjects. According to tkp.at, another study conducted by Pfizer did not adequately test for possible complications caused by ACE inhibitors contained in the vaccine [17]. According to another study, there were more pregnancy complications in vaccinated pregnant women than in unvaccinated pregnant women, although the differences were not significant. However, they can still be seen in the descriptive statistics [19].

Research in this regard shows that, according to one study, mRNA components do indeed pass into breast milk, although their effect has not yet been investigated in detail [21, 22, 23, 24]. There is only a recommendation from the DGGG, which is not based on a study, according to which rapid degradation is to be expected [21].

According to one of the studies, children breastfed by vaccinated mothers suffered side effects from breast milk. The antibody responses shown are always also (and depending on the study, even predominantly) immunoglobulin G, although the exact type is not specified. However, immunoglobulin A is predominantly responsible for the protective effect, so that it cannot be assumed that the infants "vaccinated" via breast milk are protected, but rather that the immune system is damaged by the wrong or inefficient type of antibodies [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33].

Declining birth rate in Australia, source:

 https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/abs-birth-rate-data-drops-72-is-the?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=454182&post_id=84530097&isFreemail=false

In summary, it can be said that statistically and also purely evidence-based complications in pregnancy and deaths in newborns are on the rise, and this shortly after the start of the vaccination campaign. At the same time, birth rates are falling in several countries, and the novel coronavirus vaccines have unwanted effects on the female cycle and sperm quality, although further correlations have not yet been investigated in detail. Furthermore, it has not been researched whether or not vaccinated mothers can harm their infants via vaccine components or antibodies in breast milk. However, studies to date suggest that it is more likely to cause harm than to have a protective effect. Although the decision to vaccinate is one that should be made on an individual basis, the scientific literature can and should be taken into account, contrary to the recommendation of the German government...

Sources

[1] https://www.zusammengegencorona.de/corona-im-alltag/gesundheit-von-frauen/corona-schutzimpfung-das-geruecht-von-der-unfruchtbarkeit/
[2] https://www.bib.bund.de/Publikation/2022/Fertility-declines-near-the-end-of-the-COVID-19-pandemic-Evidence-of-the-2022-birth-declines-in-Germany-and-Sweden.html
[3] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/germany-sees-significant-decline-in-live-births-9-months-after-covid-jab-rollout/?utm_source=digest-freedom-2023-02-02&utm_medium=email
[4] https://initiative-corona.info/fileadmin/dokumente/Geburtenrueckgang-Europe-DE.pdf
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/data-analyst-suggests-covid-jabs-linked-to-steep-birth-rate-drop-in-europe/
[5] https://nationfirst.substack.com/p/abs-birth-rate-data-drops-72-is-the?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=454182&post_id=84530097&isFreemail=false
[6] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/uk-doctors-raise-serious-concerns-about-medical-authorities-endorsing-covid-shots-for-pregnant-women/?utm_source=digest-freedom-2022-11-22&utm_medium=email
[7] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/german-govt-study-shows-strong-associations-between-covid-jab-and-drop-in-fertility/
[8] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/male-fertility-drops-significantly-in-months-following-pfizers-covid-jab-study/
[9] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13209
[10] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2491090/pdf/bullwho00077-0011.pdf
[11] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-documentary-exposes-world-health-organizations-vaccine-sterilization-campaign-in-kenya/
[12] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/nurse-blows-whistle-on-alarming-increase-in-fetal-deaths-after-covid-jab-rollout/?utm_source=digest-freedom-2022-12-08&utm_medium=email
[13] https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/big-pharma-is-risking-the-future-of-humanity-by-pushing-the-covid-shots-on-pregnant-women/?utm_source=digest-freedom-2022-10-24&utm_medium=email
[14] https://tkp.at/2022/07/08/us-datenbank-ueber-nebenwirkungen-c19-impfungen-erhoehen-missbildungen-bei-babys-um-das-hundertfache/
[15] https://reitschuster.de/post/deutlich-erhoehtes-risiko-von-spontanaborten-bei-geimpften/
[16] https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983
[17] https://tkp.at/2022/10/24/was-pfizer-wusste/
[18] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wj4rE0LrpR0
[19] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371587/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
[20] https://www.zusammengegencorona.de/corona-im-alltag/gesundheit-von-frauen/corona-schutzimpfung-in-der-stillzeit-das-muessen-sie-wissen/
[21] https://www.mimikama.org/impfstoff-mrna-in-muttermilch/
[22] https://www.sn.at/panorama/wissen/impfstoff-mrna-in-muttermilch-nachgewiesen-experten-verorten-kein-sicherheitsrisiko-127853161
[23] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2796427
[24] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/articlepdf/2796427/jamapediatrics_hanna_2022_ld_220039_1669653292.95976.pdf
[25] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8759542/
[26] https://sciencefiles.org/2023/02/01/pfizer-biontech-sie-luegen-in-wissenschaftlichen-zeitschriften-ueber-die-effektivitaet-ihrer-spritzbruehen/
[27] https://sciencefiles.org/2023/01/03/virologischer-supergau-was-bleibt-vom-immunsystem-nach-mrna-gentherapie-studie-zeigt-wie-mrna-gentherapien-immunsysteme-veraendern-nicht-notwendig-zum-besseren/
[28] https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/bfm.2021.0353?journalCode=bfm
[29] https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/148/5/e2021052286/181337/SARS-CoV-2-Antibodies-in-Breast-Milk-After
[30] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8062573/
[31] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.23.21252328.full.pdf
[32] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2782982
[33] https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/1/125

Share post:

8 Responses

  1. It's bad enough if the people who have been injected have been harmed in this way.
    But everyone is silent about shadding.

    When the vaccination campaign began, I was in my late 30's. Since then I have suffered from severe menopausal symptoms, as an unvaccinated person!
    It's always particularly bad at the end of the year and the beginning of the year; in summer my cycle normalizes, if you can still call it that.

    I would be interested to know if other women in their late 30s/early 40s (uninjected or injected) feel the same way. Incidentally, the doctor refused to measure my hormone status, he only ruled out pregnancy and found everything else to be normal.

  2. tilda: Get well soon. Maybe write to Mr. Langemann and ask for my email address, I have medical contacts who might be able to help.

  3. Ms. Stallbörger: Thank you very much for your words of thanks. It's just difficult with cognitive dissonance, people no longer evaluate things rationally. All that probably helps is to meet these people on an emotional level, there's no other way to approach it. Maybe I should include that in my articles...it's just not easy.

  4. Thank you for this article.

    ...it really gets to me.
    As a mother of six, I see and feel how the most valuable thing in our society, our humanity, is becoming more and more fragile, is even partially lost, has already been lost.
    Linguistic heritage, tradition, individuality, authenticity... to name but a few.
    Family spirit?...everyone is in a hurry, hectic, exchanging family members via platforms and cell phones.

    And now the most tender and innocent are also being harmed.
    One of my daughters had to give birth in isolation for a whole 48 hours without her husband, wearing a mask.
    She had to cope with pain and fear on her own.
    And yet both mother and child contracted coronavirus in hospital.
    Further time in hospital, the man was still not allowed to see her or his child.
    Mother and child were also separated.
    No physical contact, no breastfeeding...
    Now after 5 months the little one has cramps and "tics".

    one of many painful stories...

  5. A friendly reminder of the following existing criminal offenses, which do not apply to all citizens:

    § Section 223 StGB: Bodily injury
    Para. 1: Anyone who physically abuses another person or harms their health is liable to a custodial sentence of up to 5 years or to imprisonment.
    Para. 2: The attempt is punishable.

    § Section 224 StGB: Dangerous bodily harm
    Para. 1: Whoever commits bodily harm
    1. by poison or other harmful substances,
    2. by means of a weapon or other dangerous tool,
    3. by means of a cunning robbery,
    4. jointly with another party or
    5. by means of life-threatening treatment
    commits this offense is punishable by a prison sentence of 6 months to 10 years.
    Para. 2: The attempt is punishable.

    § Section 225 StGB: Abuse of persons under protection
    Para. 1: Any person under the age of 18 or a person who is defenceless due to infirmity or illness, who
    1. is under his or her care or custody,
    2. belongs to his household
    3. has been left under the control of the person responsible for care or
    4. is subordinate to him within the framework of a service or employment relationship,
    tortures or brutally abuses them, or whoever damages their health by maliciously neglecting their duty to care for them, shall be liable to a custodial sentence of 6 months to 10 years.
    Para. 2: The attempt is punishable.
    Para. 3: A custodial sentence of not less than one year shall be imposed if the offender puts the person in need of protection in danger as a result of the offense.
    1. death or serious damage to health or
    2. causes considerable damage to physical or mental development.

    § Section 226 StGB: Serious bodily injury
    Para. 1: If the bodily injury results in the injured person
    1. loses the sight in one or both eyes, hearing, the ability to speak or the ability to reproduce,
    2. loses an important part of the body or is permanently unable to use it, or
    3. is seriously and permanently disfigured or suffers from infirmity, paralysis or mental illness or disability,
    the penalty is imprisonment from 1 year to 10 years.
    Para. 2: If the offender intentionally or knowingly attempts one of the consequences specified in para. 1, the penalty is imprisonment for not less than 3 years.

    § Section 227 StGB: Bodily injury resulting in death

    § Section 235 StGB: Abduction of minors

    § Section 237 StGB: Forced marriage

    § Section 239 StGB: Deprivation of liberty

    § Section 240 StGB: Coercion
    § Section 241 StGB: Threats

    § Section 249 StGB: Robbery

    § Section 250 StGB: Aggravated robbery

    § Section 253 StGB: Extortion

    § Section 259 StGB: Receiving stolen goods

    § 263 StGB: Fraud

    § Section 129 StGB: Formation of criminal organizations

    Dear fellow human beings,
    Ask yourself, how many of the previously listed criminal offenses are committed daily by public servants against their fellow human beings and increasingly against those under their protection, which are not prosecuted, do not lead to claims for damages by the physically injured parties against the proven perpetrators (personal liability, not passing them on to uninvolved third parties, such as the taxpayer) and which, on top of that, do not constitute criminal offenses at all via other laws made for public servants, i.e. certain persons and groups of persons (occupational groups), but rather represent their professional activity and are hardly or never questioned! certain persons and groups of persons (professional groups) do not constitute criminal offenses at all, but rather represent their professional activities and are hardly or never questioned!

    As long as ALL citizens are not equal before the same law and are not treated equally, no matter how many and how extensive searches are carried out here and there, nothing will fundamentally change!
    The history books are full of it and even the present proves it every day anew to anyone who wants to see and understand!
    But because more and more people, including more and more private individuals, are personally guilty (parents towards their own children; children towards their parents in need of care; to name just two examples from the private sphere), more and more people look the other way, continue to participate and misery, suffering and death on many different levels continue to take their course.

  6. Liebe Frau Dr. Weber, vielen Dank für diese sachliche Zusammenfassung. Allein! Die Frage, die mich jeden Tag mehr umtreibt, lautet: wie kann es gelingen, diese Informationen an Menschen weiterzugeben, die das alles bisher unkritisch gesehen haben? An manchen Tagen habe ich das Gefühl, dass wir uns alle die Finger wund schreiben können und dabei doch irgendwie in unserer „Blase“ bleiben. Wir gehen mittlerweile ins vierte Jahr dieses Irrsinns und wenngleich ich jeden Tag aufs Neue versuche, meinen Optimismus zu pflegen, so kann ich doch nahezu nirgendwo ein wahrhaftiges und aufrichtiges Interesse an Aufklärung und Sachlichkeit spüren. Und frage mich immer wieder: Was muss denn noch alles passieren?

  7. The outrageous thing about this is the fact that standards developed for good reasons for the approval of medical products such as medicines and vaccines have been swept under the carpet in this way without regard for life and limb. When I came across the cost factor (development and production of vaccines using this technology is said to save the pharmaceutical industry around two thirds of its costs) fairly quickly during my research into mRNA technology in the summer of 2020, alarm bells started ringing. Like all great crimes in this world, they are either based on ideological stubbornness or greed for money. In this case, however, the two were in perfect harmony: for the one, our politicians, for the other, the pharmaceutical industry. Even a housewife can put 1 and 1 together.

  8. These connections have already been discussed in detail in the meetings of the Corona Committee Foundation in recent years by the experts invited there and warned of possible consequences. Unfortunately, this alleged conspiracy theory is becoming the truth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to this platform for the cultivated exchange of arguments.

We have forgotten how to endure contradiction. It is okay to disagree here. I would ask you to remain respectful and polite. Insults and hate comments will be removed in future, as will calls to vote for political parties. I reserve the right to delete insulting or derogatory comments. This public forum and its inherent opportunity to exchange arguments and opinions is an attempt to uphold freedom of expression - including freedom of dissent. I would like to see the old-fashioned virtue of respect cultivated here.

"Controversy is not an annoying evil, but a necessary prerequisite for the success of democracy." Federal President Dr. h.c. Joachim Gauck (ret.), only 5 years ago in his speech on the Day of the Basic Law.

en_USEnglish