Government speaks of consistent testing regime

In the resolution paper of 22.3.21, as amended, the working group around the Federal Chancellor, which is not legitimized by parliament, speaks of a Test regime. Language is becoming more totalitarian. It is always language that controls our thinking. I have already pointed this out in previous videos to sensitize you to the change in language. In section 4 of the paper, you will learn how the government wants to allow people from outside your own household to meet at Easter. By implication, you are therefore Forbidden to meet peoplethat do not correspond to an arithmetic of degrees of kinship and a group size of non-family people prescribed by the government. I ask you to question how insane these political concoctions are. This is the first time you have seen me distanced and upset. In my opinion, this draft from the Chancellor's Office marks a mindset in terms of language and content. It reveals and manifests in writing a questionable world of thought that goes worryingly far beyond an intelligent acceptance of personal responsibility by the citizens of our state. Here, the state shows an encroachment that is not legitimized by the sovereign and deeply interferes with the civil liberties of its citizens.

In dubio pro reo. Auch wenn ich von einer möglichen Fehlinterpretation des Begriffes Testregime ausgehen würde, da dieser im kleinen Kreis der medizinischen Forschung zur Anwendung kommen kann, zeigt der unsensible Umgang mit unserer Sprache, in dieser historisch bedeutenden Zeit, wie weit sich die politisch Handelnden von den sie zu vertretenden Bürgern und deren monströsen Sorgen und Nöten entfernt haben. So oder so ist die Verwendung der Vokabel „Testregime“ ein Fanal. 

Share post:

67 Responses

  1. There are many voices in the country that compare the situation today with that of the past:

    "Not everything was always good under the Führer back then either."

    Where else is this questionable trip supposed to go? I haven't booked it...

  2. Ein freundliches „Hallo“ in die Kommentatoren-Runde – Eigentlich möchte ich mich nur bedanken bei all den aufrechten Geistern, die hier mit viel Sachlichkeit, Emotionen und guten Argumenten die Maßlosigkeit der von den Polit-Chaoten veranstalteten Unterdrückung offenlegen.
    When I read the posts, it reassures me and makes me happy that there are still sensible, like-minded people and that there are forums where you can exchange ideas and restore your mental balance.
    Allerdings – was mich in steigendem Maße beunruhigt, das ist das zunehmende Auseinanderdriften der Bevölkerung in zwei Lager. Das äußert sich in einer Radikalisierung (gar Fanatisierung) des „Pro“-Lagers, in vorauseilendem Gehorsam und in erhöhter Bereitschaft, „Covid-Verstöße“ zu denunzieren.
    God (or whoever) grant that this doesn't escalate.......

    1. Unfortunately, I have been seeing a division in society for some time now, which has been exacerbated by the media-induced coronavirus crisis. Society is broken for generations to come, and that won't change for the time being - even if the pandemic is officially declared over. This denunciation also seems to be a typical German characteristic; you don't hear so much about it in other countries.

  3. God how glad I am that some people here are still in their right mind and can see through all this nonsense.
    Unfortunately, that won't help us.
    And you can't run away either (like in 1933...).
    You can't escape the crap.
    Too many people are joining in.

    1. Yes, madness without the possibility of stopping it. This shows that the alignment of disciples we all used to be has worked. All are well trained to believe, trust and second guess. Questioning things independently, e.g. reading or even understanding Edward Bernays or Gustav le bon, was unfortunately not part of the curriculum. This is how the mutual torment along the lines of the Milgram experiment works so well.

  4. Ich habe mir soeben diverse Kommentare auf linkedin durchgelesen, bezueglich der „Entschuldigung“ von Frau Merkel. Mein persoenliches Fazit: Wir steuern aktuell mit voller Fahrt in den Zusammenbruch der Gesellschaft wie wir sie bis vor Kurzem noch kannten. Es ist mir absolut unverstaendlich, wie gebildete und scheinbar intelligente Menschen diese „Entschuldigung“ ernstnehmen koennen und dann auch noch denken, dass hinter dieser Geste eine Art von Respekt fuer den Buerger stecken wuerde. Ich muss ehrlich sagen ich bin wirklich sprachlos, absolut sprachlos. Vielleicht steckt ja wirklich eine Art Stockholm-Syndrom dahinter, das waere meines Erachtens eine moegliche Erklaerung fuer dieses Massenphaenomen. Man denkt am Ende was einem die Realitaet ertraeglich macht und diese Schwelle des Ertraeglichen ist ganz individuell angelegt. Nun hat sich die Mutti entschuldigt und das ist der Beweis, dass sie es nur gut mit uns meint. Gleichzeitig ergreift mich eine gewisse Faszination wenn ich das Denken und Verhalten der Massen beobachte. Le Bon meinte bereits, dass Massen in hoechstem Maasse steuerbar sind, und er hatte recht. Vorallem ueber die beiden Hebel Angst und Hoffnung. Einige Kommentare hier gehen auf dystopische Szenarien a la Schwab ein, ich moechte nicht widersprechen, dass es wohl im Hintergrund einen Plan gibt, um so etwas zu realisieren. Gleichzeitig muss man verstehen, dass viele Menschen, die Meisten, so etwas gedanklich niemals an sich heranlassen werden. Koennen sich die Propheten des Great Reset erklaeren, weshalb jegliche Plaene, Absichtserklaerungen etc. fuer den Great Reset einsehbar sind? Klaus Schwabs Buch kann man kaufen. Alles ist recherchierbar. Der Grund ist relativ einfach: Die Psyche eines Durchschnittsbuergers ist nicht darauf ausgelegt unter einem Dauertrauma zu leider, die Positionierung solcher dystopischen Theorien in der Verschwoerungsecke geschieht nicht durch Zufall sondern notgedrungen. Die meisten Menschen koennen diesen Gedanken schlicht nicht ertragen. Genau so erklaere ich mir die Diskrepanz zwischen scheinbarer Intelligenz und dem absurden Verhalten vieler Mitmenschen. Ich wuensche allen Mitlesern alles Gute!

    1. Gleiche Erfahrung gestern gemacht. Einige wirklich intelligente Menschen haben echtes Mitleid mit A.M. „Das hat mich doch berührt, wie gebrochen sie wirkte, nach all der Arbeit während der Pandemie“…

      Und „Mein Kampf“ konnte auch jeder lesen…

  5. The resolution paper, if interpreted from the perspective of criticizing and rejecting the measures, reads like blackmail. It probably reads more purposefully and clearly if the perspective is one of approving the measures.

    From my perspective, the decision could be briefly summarized as follows:
    All those who do not get tested and who do not get vaccinated are put under financial, social and emotional pressure until they are forced to do so by those who allow and advocate testing and vaccination in their immediate environment.

    The government has a strategy - right from the start; and that is why it is not giving any answers. It was stated right at the beginning what the roadmap is: To vaccinate the population. All measures, if you perceive them from this blackmailing perspective, have a great effect because they are gradually squeezing people from all sides.

    Ich glaube, der Irrtum, dem man leicht aufsitzen kann, ist, zu denken, dass wenn sich „die anderen alle impfen lassen“, dann irgendwann Ruhe ist und man selbst unbehelligt bleiben wird. Wer bei den Masken nichts unternommen hat, wer bei den Kontaktbeschränkungen nichts unternommen hat, wer beim Testen nichts unternommen hat, der wird auch beim Impfen nichts unternehmen, so könnte eine verkürzte Bewertung heißen, aber so einfach ist es nicht.

    Das Tempo und die Grenze des Zumutbaren wird von Menschen sehr unterschiedlich erlebt. Sich hierbei eine Gelassenheit zu bewahren oder sie sogar als heiter zu empfinden, ist eine Kunst und eine Selbst-Disziplin, die ihresgleichen sucht. Ich habe verschiedentliche, für mich „schlimmster-Fall-Szenarien“ durchgespielt und gehe davon aus, dass ich meine Einkommensquelle verlieren werde (ein Teil ist bereits weg) und nur der Rückgriff auf Freundschaft, Familie und andere soziale Beziehungen ein gangbarer Weg ist. Auch Geschäftsbeziehungen und sich untereinander zu bezahlen für geleistete Arbeiten oder Gründungen von neuen Einkommensmöglichkeiten im Kreis derer, die sich ihre Selbstbestimmung bewahren wollen, sind Szenarien, die wir untereinander austauschen könnten.

    1. My personal heroine in extreme situations, although I don't want to compare hers with our current situation, is the pianist Alice Herz-Sommer. Two world wars, Theresienstadt etc. etc. She lived to be 110 years old, and did so with a serene and cheerful composure. Not everyone can do that. But as Bruce Lee once said: A goal is not always there to be achieved, often it only serves to be achieved...
      On that note for today: Bonne nuit.

    2. Their vision is to take the property of the average person, end government borrowing, destroy any business dependent upon fossil fuels, and "build back better" all green while reducing population. These are the ideas of academics with no sense of humanity or even how the economy functions. They reject Adam Smith's invisible hand because they want to create their own world. This is no different than what was attempted by Karl Marx. They are running out of time. They realize they are on a short leash. The resistance is building and the political crossroads is coming rapidly - 2022.
      The most dangerous place will be Europe, for Schwab has total control of Europe. All the world leaders there ask him how high to jump and even what to say. They are using the excuse that there are not enough vaccines available so the lockdowns must continue. They need to thoroughly destroy as much of the European economy as possible in hopes that they can use this as a model for the rest of the world.
      This idea that you will own nothing will lead to revolution. It is such a drastic alteration of everything we have had for thousands of years that it is just absurd to think that they can train humans simply to bark, sit, and rollover.

  6. 23.3.21 – man möchte meinen, Frau Dr. Merkel ergießt ihr persönliches Ruhebedürfnis zu Ostern übers Volk – vielleicht, um mal etwas zu „Exponentialfunktion“ und „Inzidenz“ im Lehrbuch nachzulesen und einen veterinärmedizinischen Seuchenbekämpfungsansatz gegenüber den Untertanen (Maulkorb, Séparée, Schnelltest) im Hinblick auf den Tierschutz und die artgerechte Haltung zu überprüfen. Scol. Wahrscheinlich auf Mallorca?…

  7. I no longer know what else to write, because I've already written everything ...... and nothing, absolutely nothing, has changed.
    I am a doctor and I understand very well that we are all being taken for a ride.
    There is no longer a pandemic.
    There is also no excess mortality, considering that the proportion of very old and therefore more mortal people has increased significantly.
    So there is no pandemic, not even an epidemic. The Cov19 infection is over. +
    But why are we all being detained? Home office, homeschooling, travel bans, visitation bans, contact bans, work bans, business bans, assembly bans...... what is this??????
    All of this scares me.
    We are at war, a war with different but no less terrible, destructive and even deadly means. .....
    I am completely at a loss.

    1. What's the point?

      I assume that the question is meant seriously. It has been discussed ad nauseam (sorry for the language).
      mentioned that we are now live in the implementation phase of the Great Reset.
      The so-called Canada Plan is being implemented 1:1.

      If you want to see the international links, take a look at the Martin Armstrong Economics website
      and enter terms such as Klaus Schwab, Great Reset, Bill Gates, Merkel etc. in the search mask.

      by the way:

      In my neighboring town here on the doorstep, however, something is now noticeably stirring, during the walks on Mondays
      Until a few weeks ago about 60-80 people took part, last week 250, yesterday over 400.

      I have hope, as we all know, hope dies last.

    2. Hello Dr. No (funny name you have chosen, not without irony:),

      We are all being stretched to the limit right now. In any case, I am pleased to read that you are a doctor and have a critical attitude.

      Thanks to you!

      I think there are many doctors who are just as shocked as you are. It's just not easy to find a way of dealing with it, even if you personally aren't a fan of strong words. You may risk losing your professional reputation or even your source of income.

      Ich persönlich habe dieses auch als „Befreiung“ erlebt. Ich habe einen Auftraggeber verloren (bin solo-selbstständig) und werde vermutlich auf dem anderen Bein nicht mehr ganz so lange stehen können. Aber ich bin wirklich auch erstaunt, dass dieses mir nicht ausschließlich Kummer bereitet (denn das tut es), sondern auch einen Druck von der Brust zu nehmen scheint, weil ich mich nicht kleinlaut aus meinem Arbeitsbereich habe drängen lassen. Zumindest nicht nach dem Austausch an Argumenten, wenngleich ich natürlich finanziell verloren habe.

      If you can't stand it any longer, which was the case for me when I was told at the beginning of January that everyone had to wear masks in the settings too, you fight back. People run at different speeds. Some can withstand an astonishing amount of self-deprecation and pain that they won't admit to.

      I would like to encourage you. What we need is mutual support and confidence. Courage and inspiration. Have you advised patients in such a way that they can make their decisions calmly and with the help of your medical skill and experience? For example, what was the reaction when they indicated that you as a doctor had been approachable in your attitude, regardless of what a patient chose?

      Best wishes to you!

    3. So-called Dr. NO, where do you live that you write such nonsense here, isolated in a bunker apartment without contact to the environment and without media - however you interpret it ?
      If you are indeed a doctor, I hope never to meet you as a patient.

    4. I can only agree with this. I'm stunned in places, especially about the speechlessness in my own family, because insurmountable
      have built bridges of opinion. To make matters worse, this is all deliberate and encouraged.
      This division seems to me to be irreparable.

  8. Das ZDF setzt wahrscheinlich mit seiner Pandemie-Sendung heute Abend um 20:15h noch einen drauf und „impft“ die Zuschauer wahrscheinlich mit den entsprechenden Bildern und Informationen, die sie bekommen sollen.

  9. Tests carried out (CW48/20-CW06/21): Tests carried out in Germany: 4,334,634

    Of which positive: 11.8 %

    Covid 2020 deaths: 39 201
    Excess mortality: +48 100
    Age group: Mainly over 80.

    Death rate Jan 2021: 104 871.
    70-75 years: 8 137
    75-80: 11 999
    80-85: 21 762
    85-90: 20 843
    90-95: 16 183
    From 95: 6,673 = 77,460 deaths
    Vaccination has been carried out in nursing homes since Dec. In December, the Paul Ehrlich Institute reported around 200 deaths following vaccination.

    2021: KW01 24 509 Covid: 5 191
    KW02 24 162 Covid: 4 680
    KW03 23 746 Covid: 4 294
    KW04 22 178 .no covid deaths
    KW05 20 908 No Covid deaths

    Deaths: In the range of previous years.
    No overloading of hospitals.
    https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2021/02/PD21_056_12621.html

    1. However, you have to consider who all counts as Covid dead, even if the symptoms were completely different, and that the test can be influenced by too high a number of cycles. So the Covid dead should be marked with a ?

      1. The ICD 11 criteria no longer play a role in determining the cause of death by and not by but with Covid. Why do you think they are called DIAGNOSIS criteria?????

          1. Bed occupancy in Germany due to Covid: 3047 (also on other wards, not just intensive care).
            Invasive ventilation: 1754 of the 3047

            Emergency reserve of intensive care beds free: 10. 378

            Total number of occupied intensive care beds: 19,829
            Free beds: 4115
            Kept free for Covid: approx. 2000

  10. ...the day before yesterday, an emergency doctor friend had to transport a 26-year-old with no previous illnesses from Peine to Hanover for ECMO ventilation...
    The pandemic does not exist, but the proportion of seriously ill people is significantly lower than suggested.
    Walter van Rossum has done excellent research on the Drostotom...
    And here is a colleague whose assessment coincides 100% with mine...

    https://youtu.be/LuOu9y-Ilpk

    The fact that the opposition has been weakened is probably due to the defamation of the AfD. Even if I personally don't tend to vote for them, the discussion and democratic debate with a democratically elected party should be sought and not made taboo. Individual content - yes. But not an entire party...that also only strengthens those in power...belittling others in order to elevate themselves...

  11. So, if the constitutional courts don't slowly wake up now and put a stop to this, I'm really worried...

    1. This must be very difficult for the judges working there ..... otherwise they would have done it already. Or would they? There are just enough penelers these days.

    2. Chancellor of Hearts wants to close everything for 6 days, including the grocery stores. My brother used to laugh at me for that. I hope he won't laugh anymore.

  12. Zur sprachlichen Verrohung unter Virologen. Nachfolgend ein facebook post von mir , den ich am 12.05.20 hochgeladen habe. Die Sprachkultur unter diesen „Medizinern“ sehe ich ein wenig kritischer . Ich kann von einer Bundesregierung erwarten , solche Form der Sprache zurückzuweisen. Wenn sie das nicht macht , sich dieser Sprache annimmt , dann hat sie eine ähnliche Geisteshaltung, die ich auch bei den Medizinern , damals vermutete:

    In einem“ tagesspiegel „Artikel wird Herr Drosten wie folgt zitiert. Er halte das irreführende „Massenphänomen“ von verkürzten, oder irreführenden Schlagzeilen für „gefährlich“, sagte Drosten am Dienstag in der 40. Ausgabe des Podcast. Die Medien sorgen somit für eine „Zersplitterung der öffentlichen Meinung.“. Diese……“ Zersplitterung der öffentlichen Meinung“….. , man könnte für Zersplitterung natürlich auch das Wort Diskurs verwenden oder Diversität, und die Aussage nach gängiger Meinung wohl immer noch sachlich korrekt, ist also gefährlich. Man kann aus dieser Aussage schliessen , dass Drosten es für ungefährlicher halten würde , wenn die öffentliche Meinung nicht zersplittert, sondern gleichgeschaltet wäre. Wenn das Volk isg. in allen Bereichen das selbe denkt, oder zumindest die Medien ,ist also also erstrebenswert für eine demokratische Gesellschaft? Ist halt ein total unpolitischer Mensch ,der Herr Drosten…genau wie einer seiner verstorbenen Kollegen, der, äähm, damals beim RKI arbeitete : Claus Schilling.

    1. Something else comes to mind: Josef Mengele worked at the University Institute for Hereditary Biology and Racial Hygiene in Frankfurt/Main. Coincidentally, this is the same academic institution where Christian Drosten obtained his doctorate for the thesis that could not be found until June 2020. But you can't see any connection here, otherwise we'd be talking about a V-theory.

      By the way, im März kommt es zu einer Neuauflage des Buches „Das Robert Koch-Institut im Nationalsozialismus“ von Annette Hinz-Wessels.

      What the current figures of the RKI as an authority bound by the instructions of the Federal Government are all about was clearly explained in session 44 of the Corona Committee. In this session, a concentration camp survivor also explained the parallels between the Nazi regime and our present day. I sincerely hope the circle does NOT close here!

    2. Was sich in Bezug auf Drosten, Wieler und erst recht dem Chef-Paniker der SPD Karl Lauterbach mit medialer Unterstützung von ARD und ZDF mit Sicherheit sagen lässt, dass sie jegliches Maß verloren haben. Kann mir einmal einer dieser Herrschaften erläutern, warum jeden Tag mehrfach über 200…300… überwiegend hochbetagte Mitbürger berichtet wird, die angeblich an oder wohl überwiegend doch „nur“ mit Covid-19 verstorben sind, während im Durchschnitt über 200 pro Tag oder 75.000 pro Jahr oftmals jüngere an Sepsis, d.h. Blutvergiftung verstorbene Mitmenschen in Deutschland (s. Badische Neuesten Nachrichten vom 27.02.2021, Ausgabe B, S.3; s. auch: https://www.swr.de/wissen/odysso/medizinischer-notfall-so-gefaehrlich-ist-eine-sepsis-100.html) are hardly worth a mention? And this despite the fact that there should be no doubt that sepsis is the main cause of death and has been for years. Is it simply not possible to become famous with sepsis victims? Are sepsis victims themselves to blame? Is it not possible to use this threat to health and life to restrict freedom rights to the same extent, not to advance digitalization, not to distribute masks profitably, not to collect billions with vaccines or tests, not to make a name for oneself as a crisis manager or what else is behind this unequal treatment? However, I think it's much more likely that Merkel & Co themselves don't really know what's behind their delusional ideas. It certainly can't be the figures. It is more likely to be the same irrationality that led to the persecution of witches in the Middle Ages and the persecution of the Jews in modern times and which always seemed to be based on the herd instinct, which successively copied the delusions of individuals onto entire societies. To be honest, Corona scares me about as much, or rather as little, as sepsis. As a life-experienced adult, you should have learned to live with risks. If you can't do that, you should consult a psychiatrist or think about making your everyday life a little more exciting. On the other hand, I am not indifferent to the fact that our society, our youth and many of our fellow human beings are being transformed to the brink of their existence. We don't know a single person personally who has died with coronavirus, let alone from coronavirus. But we do know a dear, middle-aged fellow human being who was plunged into such an existential crisis by the coronavirus panic that he committed suicide a few weeks ago. It's a stupidly naive narrative from our Chancellor that we can make up for everything. Life is not a dress rehearsal. You can't make up for anything in life. As a childless person herself, she should know that better than anyone. People only turn 18 once, only graduate from high school once, only complete their studies once, etc. Anyone who cannot celebrate such events in company, which we alone have experienced in our closest family circle this year, permanently loses part of their identity. For me, the fact that (young) people in this situation are even threatened with punishment crosses the line into a crime against our youth. Even more so, our friend will never make up for it. He is not even allowed to call the aforementioned rulers to account for their political failures. If we have learned anything from two dictatorships in our country in the 20th century alone, it is that we must never again remain silent when rulers deliberately stir up fears in the population in order to achieve political goals and do not even shy away from sidelining or even criminalizing entire population groups.

      1. There's no better way to put it, thank you very much. You speak from my soul. Despite all the gloomy prospects, I find it really encouraging that we are not alone, as you can see from this platform.

  13. Wenn Christian Lindner gestern attestiert „wir sind als Opposition“ machtlos (das ZDF berichtete), sollte das alle Bürger aufrütteln. Wir sind der Souverän. Im Bundestag und damit auch in der Regierung sollten „nur“ unsere Interessenvertreter und nicht unsere Herrscher sitzen. Ob diese sich dessen noch bewusst sind, ist zunehmend ungewiss. [Wikipedia: „In der Republik gibt es keine allgemeingültige Definition des Souveräns. Zwar ist im Grundsatz das Volk Träger der Souveränität (→ Volkssouveränität), doch hat es je nach Verfassung die Staatsgewalt mehr oder weniger an Staatsoberhaupt und Parlament delegiert (→ Verfassungsstaat)]. Die jüngsten Sprachregelungen lassen jedenfalls daran zweifeln. Die Macht der Opposition sind Argumente, oftmals sogar die besseren Argumente, wie ich hoffentlich in mehreren Diskussionsbeiträgen zum Thema Klimawandel und Klimaschutz deutlich genug gemacht habe, veröffentlicht hier im Blog „Fieberkurve im März“ sowie weiteren Blogs. Die Gefühlslage des Liberalen Lindner macht deutlich, dass das Parlament seiner Aufgabe nicht mehr gewachsen ist. Das dürfte gleich drei Gründe haben:
    1. an often largely empty parliament and parliamentarians playing around on their smartphones instead of listening attentively are a clear sign that we are electing too many self-absorbed narcissists to the Bundestag, for whom maintaining their power and their proportional representation is more important than the well-being of their citizens. No one has documented this arrogance of power more clearly than the Chancellor recently, when, during one of Lindner's contributions on the coronavirus crisis, her smartphone was demonstratively more important to her than attentively following Lindner's arguments.
    2. the Bundestag parliament is obviously so (too) large that the herd instinct has long since set in. And all studies show that a herd generally behaves more stupidly than the individual members of the herd. We need a reduction of the Bundestag to a manageable size instead of a pension office for deserving party members with no real claim to shape the future.
    3. the various sideline activities of parliamentarians probably no longer leave them enough time to look after our interests. In contrast to the rest of us, this underperformance does not lead to a reduction or even elimination of their allowances or to a reduction in their lavish pensions. Unlike most of our fellow citizens, professional politicians can make double provision for their old age. The party lists give this group of people the opportunity to secure themselves a safe place in this institution, bypassing the will of the voters.

    1. I certainly don't want to defend any of the MPs whose behavior when other parliamentary groups speak is simply unbelievable. However, I find such behavior almost understandable when Wendehals Lindner or Co. speak. In my eyes, Mr. Lindner in particular has the incredible gift of saying today what he thought yesterday and the next day expressing how he sees the situation the day after tomorrow. I do not claim that he is the only one who is so flexible.

  14. Dear Mr. Langemann, thank you very much for your always interesting contributions. I myself went through a clarification process during the corona crisis, which I am concluding with a book project. It is important for me to channel the powerful feelings of anger, rage and hatred into constructive channels. We have all been asleep for a long time and felt quite comfortable in our non-responsibility. The boomerang is now coming back in the form of powerlessness. In this respect, we can only thank the great figures of light around the Davos Summit for opening our eyes or having already opened them. Let's start to return to ourselves, otherwise we will remain stuck in projection without having gained anything. Consciousness determines being, not the other way around, as we may have been told up and down by Marx under socialism, but Kant, Fichte, Schelling and Hegel came to this conclusion through logical argumentation. So let's finally become aware of our species and stop complaining. Let's take personal responsibility.

    Lassen sie mich auf den Begriff „Regime“ kurz eingehen. Ja ich teile Ihre Auffassung zur Sprache, als Kulturwissenschaftlerin bin ich gewiss auch affin für Sprache und da komme ich zu des Pudels Kern: Als Juristin kann ich Ihnen sagen, dass dieser Begriff in der Rechtssprache schon längst eingeführt vielleicht auch salonfähig ist: dort spricht man von einem Rechtsregime und meint einen Regelungskontext für eine spezielle Rechtsmaterie. Interessant daran ist, dass ich diesbezüglich ziemlich unbewusst war, denn der Begriff Regime ist in anderen Sprachkontexten eher negativ konnotiert. Der langen Rede kurzer Sinn, ich sollte mal wieder Viktor Klemperer LTI lesen, um an das einstige kulturwissenschaftliche Niveau wieder anknüpfen zu können. Danke jedenfalls, dass Sie hier ganz konkret meinen Blick geschärft haben. Ihnen weiterhin gutes Gelingen.

    1. Liebe Katrin, in diesem Zusammenhang muss ich es hier nochmal sagen: Ja, das Bewusstsein steht am Anfang, jedoch glaube ich mittlerweile durch eigene Erfahrungen im Familien- und Bekanntenkreis (z.T. durchgehend Akademiker in hohen Positionen) dass dieses Bewusstsein in der Masse nicht oder noch nicht angekommen ist. Ich erlebe jedenfalls bei geradezu allen Personen Zustimmung zu allen derzeitigen Maßnahmen, durchgehende Impfbereitschaft und Aussagen wie: „Meine Grundrechte sind mir sch…egal“. Da hört der Kampf irgendwann auf.

      1. Dear Michael, I am also an academic, so I am far from having a highly developed consciousness. Consciousness is not located in the brain. Consciousness is the seer and thinker, the mind is just a mediator - which is overrated in our society. My brother has always been much more intelligent than me: he is fully on track. He too can hardly wait to get the zombie soup and renew it every year. After all, it's a vaccination, what could possibly happen? Unfortunately, Welt and Co don't explain and he doesn't notice the zombie soup propaganda. He believes that propaganda only exists in dictatorships. And he is clever enough to recognize propaganda immediately....... he imagines. He thinks Corinna is a deadly disease and when I talk about the immune system, he laughs at me. With this killer thing, the immune system is absolutely useless. He's on a ventilator within hours. He says the lockdown isn't there to keep us locked up, but to protect us from a situation like Portugal. I've copied out excerpts from Mr. Merloo's book, or rather his summary of it, on manipulation and am trying to draw him to sites like here and Boris Reitschuster so that he can get to know other reporting. I also send him the statistics to make it clear to him that there are significant differences between the RKI figures and the reporting. He doesn't do that himself.
        I hope he becomes more critical. I'm worried about his health. Consciousness work and growth don't happen at school. Not even at university.

        This crisis is blowing up many a world view and many people can't let that get to them, e.g. the world view that the mass media tell the truth, politicians are representatives of the people etc.. They would never do to us what they did to Corinna - after all, we live in a decent constitutional democracy. That is the filter through which reality must pass. As I said before, the mass media has always been opium for the people, it's just more obvious than ever with Corinna. The media have never been independent, but my brother believes that, which is why he trusts their information.

        I can't blame my brother either, because if I lived in his bubble, I would think the same way. By bubble, I mean his mental reality.

        First of all, we don't learn to think freely. Nor do we learn to ask questions. And secondly, we are all born into a society that manipulates us and ensures that we - to paraphrase Mr. Langemann - think in a supervised way. After school or university, you first have to work your way out of this state and then you have to ask yourself: What is still true here?

        Schau dir mal auf YouTube „Es ist ein Kult“ von Gunnar Kaiser an. Er versucht dieses Phänomen zu erklären.

        Some will wake up as a result of this crisis. Some will stay down. Until they die.
        In many ways, the time before Corinna made us live in a comfortable illusion.
        Best regards

        1. Thank you very much for the review, Jo. Very well formulated and that's exactly how I experience it. Well, many people do.

        2. In my immediate family, I also encountered exactly this kind of rupture of consciousness that I almost couldn't believe if I hadn't experienced it myself.
          My older children do not understand their mother. I, who applied to leave the country for the first time in 1986 in order to be able to offer my children a democracy as the basis of their lives, experience a deep lack of understanding from these very children, to the point of turning away from my critical statements and my criticism of the measures.
          I am accused of mishandling and antisocial behavior because I attended demonstrations.
          I also share articles by CdkW and Reitschuster, provide statistics and reap rejection. I know that everyone has their own pace and I give them time, but it eats at me and I am afraid that they will stumble into this new world order without thinking and that my grandchildren will pay the bill.
          All that remains to be done is to allow the steady drip to work and to practice patience and love.

          1. That must hurt a lot. They will realize that you are in the right and I think they will be ashamed. They will realize it when it affects them personally. Unfortunately, it has to be said that many people are still doing too well. When your own life is affected, and we will all be affected by the financial crash, when familiar things collapse, then even the biggest sleeper wakes up - unfortunately through pain. Of course you want to protect your own family from that. I'm in the same dilemma.

          2. Oh, dear Annette, I can understand that so well; fortunately I am surrounded by friends who think like you, which helps from time to time. But when the rift goes through the family, it hurts particularly badly, especially as you had chosen the rather rocky road back then ...
            All good wishes for you in this dilemma or rather in the Gordian knot that cannot yet be cut, Maria.

        3. Good evening Jo,
          First of all, I'm very happy to have landed in this club, so my heartfelt thanks to Markus Langemann and his great companions.
          Ihre Aussage „Das Bewußtsein ist der Seher und Denker, der Verstand nur ein Vermittler …“ gefällt mir sehr gut. Ich denke, es geht weniger um Intelligenz als vielmehr um (Lebens-) Erfahrung und Intuition, zumal – wie Sie schon richtig bemerken – weder Bewußtseinsarbeit noch Wachstum(s-Erlangung), geschweige denn Seelenbildung in der Schule bzw. im Studium gelehrt werden. Möglicherweise liegt genau dort der „Hase im Pfeffer“ – wie man hierzulande sagt.
          Als ehemalige Musikerin habe ich mit 30jähriger DDR-Erfahrung und anschließendem, nochmals 30jährigem Lernen in der – von einem Tag auf den anderen vollkommen „umgekrempelten Realität“ – sehr sensible Antennen entwickelt. Nach jahrelanger, immer schon kritischer und freidenkender Beschäftigung mit allem Über-uns-Hereinbrechenden wundert mich eigentlich nichts mehr; das muß ich leider konstatieren. Aber zweimal „das große Andersrum“ in reichlich 60 Jahren ist definitiv einmal zu viel im Leben …
          I wish you much success for your further educational work, personally all the best and send you my best regards from Saxony, Maria (quite perplexed).

      2. A social psychologist at KenFM put this phenomenon in a nutshell and explained it well. It was pretty simple.
        This fueled panic has brought to light the primal fear (fear of death) in people to which there are only a few answers: Flight, fight or death reflex .... The former is already happening with emigration to Hungary, Sweden, etc. We see enough peaceful fighters at the demonstrations .... but those who feel/perceive themselves as too small and weak have to go into rigidity. This means not standing out, denigrating other opinions (which scare them) and labeling people ... and grasping at all straws (including vaccination) to get their old life back.
        Fear is a deep unconscious (hypnotic) state, one of our basic feelings. You can't simply change it. To turn this fear around, you need to be aware that you have it. Only then can people change something! It is a process of becoming conscious.
        I have not given up hope that a few more will make it to the side of the awakened. The quality government will succeed with its chaos measures!
        Let's stay positive, even if some people despair!
        There are so many people who we can support with positive thinking, who remain upright for us. Thanks also to you Mr. Langemann!

  15. Trotzdem ist spannend, dass Prof. Ioannidis, wie ein neuer Beitrag von Reitschuster.de zeigt, offenbar von einer wirklichen pandemischen Gefahr durch das neuartige Virus ausgeht und sowohl Masken, Social Distancing etc. befürwortet. Also, was denn nun?? Der „gemeine Konsument“ muss doch mittlerweile vollkommen überfordert sein durch die diametral unterschiedlichen Informationen.

    1. Mr. Lindner's statement is simply a lie! The powerlessness results solely from the unwillingness to work together within the opposition on the central issue of the legality of the measures. FDP, AFD and Linke (I'll leave out the Greens) together have more than 25%, so they can end the spook at any time with a complaint to the BVG! But for the opposition parties, contact debt is more relevant than the well-being and continued existence of the country!

      1. Dear Mr. Jussen,

        wenn Sie es schaffen die FDP und die Linke zu einer Kooperation mit der AFD zu bringen haben Sie gewonnen. Im uebrigen, bin ich der Meinung, dass die Linke dieses „Projekt“ nicht befuerworten wuerde, ich denke die Gruende sollten jedem klar sein. Die AFD hat schon sehr haeufig Kooperationsbereitschaft signalisiert, wird aber von jeder Partei komplett isoliert und ignoriert.

      2. I would agree that the FDP and every parliamentary opposition party already has the opportunity to take action against the Federal Government. There is at least the possibility of a dispute between organs (Art. 93 GG in conjunction with § 63 ff BVerfGG and there is also the abstract control procedure, which could have been used in the IFSG, this is regulated in the GG, BVerfGG. I wrote to the FDP in the naive hope in the fall and pointed out these procedural rights with reference to the facts. Unfortunately, the FDP, although it receives money via party funding and should be structurally better positioned than the little man/woman, is sending them into the legal fray, and is even encouraging its already ruined clientele to do so. I think this party in particular should know the Basic Law. I have not received any reply to my email. This is very ambiguous and another reason why I already knew as an East German citizen back in the days of reunification that this party democracy is a waste of time. Now that I am also involved in corruption prevention and compliance, I can underline this once again. The Council of Europe (GRECO) has written Germany a lot in this regard. Therefore, if we think for ourselves and act responsibly, something new can develop, something that is more viable, sustainable and truly democratic.

    2. Lieber Michael, das was du sagst, erinnert mich ein bisschen an Prof. Dr. Streeck, den sie ja auch weichgespült haben. In einem Interview sprach er von der Sicherheit der Zombiesuppe. Was soll er auch sonst sagen? Man würde ihn als Verräter beschimpfen, als verantwortungslos, wenn er alles sagen würde was er sagen will. Er wird ja schon für viele Aussagen beschimpft. Auch Herr Prof. Dr. I…unaussprechlicher Name kann nicht alles sagen, was er will. Er ist Teil des Wissenschaftsbetriebes, von diesem auch abhängig, auch er wird Forschungsgelder der Pharma erhalten und hat einen Ruf und Lehrstuhl zu verlieren. Und gibt ein Interview im Massenmedium Welt. Die Zielgruppe sind nicht wir, sondern Merkelhörige, die sich ärgern, dass sie die Zombiesuppe vom Markt nahmen („Gott sei Dank“ steht sie wieder zur Verfügung). Denen kannst du die Wahrheit nicht sagen. Er hat bei solchen Menschen – hoffentlich – ein kleines Türchen des kritischen Denkens aufgestoßen.
      Stell dir vor er sagt:“ Sehr geehrter Deutscher Kriecher, Corinna gab es schon immer, Viren mutieren, macht euch keine Sorgen, kümmert euch um euer Immunsystem, ihr werdet auf das Übelste und Offensichtlichste manipuliert.“ Das ist in der Corinna Sekte Blasphemie. Er wägt hier ab, wie Prof. Dr. Streeck auch. Das ist zumindest meine Interpretation.
      It's a twisted world: the person who dies shortly after the zombie soup died of pre-existing conditions. Dying of illnesses with Corinna is Corinna's cause of death. Age doesn't matter. Those who take responsibility and warn of the dangers of zombie soup are torn apart. Those who recommend it irresponsibly are praised.
      I also think, as I have read the letter from the Belgian infectiologist to the WHO, that what is not, can still be: He says that the mass use of the zombie shot will lead to a disaster of epidemic proportions (due to immune escape of the virus), he is in favor of vaccinating only the risk groups, although I find the word vaccinate in the sense completely wrong, since it is not a conventional vaccination, but the word inspires confidence.
      And he also warns against the measures. Because he says that these measures do not train our immune system, we cannot counter the mutations because we are already untrained by the predecessor variants. He is in favor of herd immunity. In other words, he fears that the mutation will eventually become immune to us instead of us to it.

      1. The man's name is Dr. G. Vanden Bossche and he has worked for Kill Bill in vaccination research, as well as in German vaccination research. So he is not an aluminum hat, as critics like to defame him.

        1. Thanks again. Yes, I also read that from the Belgian.
          Can no longer understand the world. At least all those responsible, should a disaster really occur, cannot claim that they were not warned and admonished from all sides. And until the matter is dealt with in court, there will unfortunately, as is so often the case, be countless unnecessary victims.
          Let's hope it doesn't happen.

    3. Dear Michael,
      ich habe diese letztere Ansicht von Herrnn Prof. Ioannidis auch mit Verwunderung und Befremden zur Kenntnis genommen. Schließlich gibt es von ihm ein Bulletin, das die WHO, ich glaube im September 2020, veröffentlicht hat, in welchem er die Erkrankung Covid19 noch mit der einer mittelschweren Grippe vergleicht und das Sterberate unter den „Infizierten“ mit 0,27% beziffert. Warum er das SarsCov2 Virus nun als „neuartig“ bezeichnet, wenn es bereits ein SarsCov1 gegeben hat (glaube das war 2009) und von einer pandemischen Gefahr ausgeht, ist mir daher unverständlich. Dann wäre ja zumindet 2018 eine pandemische Gefahr von Deutschland ausgegangen. (25.000 Influenza-Tote). Ich kann mir das nur so erkären, dass man ihn in einer ähnlichen Weise unter Druck gesetzt hat, wie hier Herrn Prof. Streek. Allerdings finde ich es schlimm, falls er nachgegeben haben sollte.

  16. noch mehr „kostenlose“ d.h. auf Kosten der Steuerzahler Tests, die nur die epidemische Lage nationaler Tragweite manifestieren sollen, die totale Überwachung mittels Apps — schlimmer als sich Orwell vorstellen konnte! Bleibt nur zu hoffen, dass die Maskenskandale der Regierungsparteien CDU/CSU etwas in der Bevölkerung bewirken werden! Zum Glück sind Mallorca und die andern Balearen kein Risikogebiete mehr!

    1. Mallorca ist doch eher dafür ‚orchestriert‘ neue Virusvarianten an Fahnenflüchtige Urlauber zu verteilen die dann bei Rückkehr als Superspreader dienen. Quasi als weiteres Standbein für die Legitimation härterer Maßnahmen.

  17. Freiheit und Demokratie mussten schon immer (mit entsprechenden Opfern) verteidigt werden. Wir, die nach 1945 geborenen Westdeutschen hatten das Glück, dass all diese Opfer von dn französischen, britischen, australischen, US-amerikanischen und eingeschränkt auf den Westen, dafür in besonderem Maße von den russischen Truppen erbracht wurden. Wir dagegen konnten das Leben unbeschwert und in vollen Zügen genießen. Es scheint, diese erfreulich(st)e Phase unserer Geschichte geht gnadenlos zu Ende. Der wirtschaftliche und militärische Druck im globalen Kessel steigt permanent, parallel nehmen die Freiheiten ab. Insbesondere KI und Digitalisierung geben den Herrschenden und Mächtigen die Mittel in die Hand, die Überwachung „ihrer“ Bürger stetig auszudehnen und das nicht nur in totalitären Staaten, wie uns Edward Snowden unmissverständlich klargemacht hat. Wie hart dieser Kampf auch vom Westen geführt wird, zeigt überdeutlich das unmenschliche Schicksal von Julian Assange, der es gewagt hat, Kriegsverbrechen der USA schonungslos offenzulegen. Der Umgang mit den sog. Querdenkern hierzulande erinnert zunehmend daran. Die Suche nach der Wahrheit war schon immer ein gefährliches Unterfangen.

  18. So, I can't do much with all this information anymore. Dystopia keeps coming to mind. Education is and remains important, of course, but it should be provided by the so-called quality media. Personally, I hope that at some point there will finally be some really good news and things will start to move in a healthy direction. The daily status quo as before is no longer really bearable. And it doesn't help either, only our own helplessness.

    1. „Ich persönlich hoffe, dass es irgendwann und endlich wirklich gute Nachrichten gibt und die Dinge anfangen, sich in eine gesunde Richtung zu entwickeln.“ Dafür müssen wir etwas tun. Alle gemeinsam.

  19. ...they have their (non-specialist) fixed blinders - ideas on how to deal with the unfortunate situation...and hear and read: nothing.

    1. That's how it looks, but they can't or don't want to hear or read. In my opinion, they don't think they need to

  20. Addendum:

    particularly likeable, it says:

    epidemiological surveillance via integrated systems that enable real-time monitoring

    Fits in wonderfully with Klaus Schwab's announcements: Great Reset will lead to the merging of our physical, digital and digital worlds.
    biological identity

  21. It's sad that even major institutions such as Welthungerhilfe, WHO and business associations, which consider lockdowns to be massively harmful, either don't have the guts or the power to end them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to this platform for the cultivated exchange of arguments.

We have forgotten how to endure contradiction. It is okay to disagree here. I would ask you to remain respectful and polite. Insults and hate comments will be removed in future, as will calls to vote for political parties. I reserve the right to delete insulting or derogatory comments. This public forum and its inherent opportunity to exchange arguments and opinions is an attempt to uphold freedom of expression - including freedom of dissent. I would like to see the old-fashioned virtue of respect cultivated here.

"Controversy is not an annoying evil, but a necessary prerequisite for the success of democracy." Federal President Dr. h.c. Joachim Gauck (ret.), only 5 years ago in his speech on the Day of the Basic Law.

en_USEnglish