A few days ago, I received an e-mail from a reader who wrote to me. The man is the owner of a haulage company in Upper Bavaria. This e-mail touched me, because it says a lot about the current state of our society, the despair about this state and the struggle with our homeland. The e-mail came from the belly of the Federal Republic, where healthy feelings are so often located.
This e-mail seemed to me like an S.O.S from the radio operator's booth of the capsizing German steamer.
The majority is asleep, the band is playing, the rotten leading media are blowing out the last of the hot steam. Meanwhile, the boat is filling up below the waterline. Everyone on board has felt the powerful coronavirus jolt that has shattered all the political china. The shards are lying around.
At the same time, people feverishly dance and dance against it. At times it feels like the last tango.
Well, as he wrote to me, the valiant e-mail man has simply knocked his well-running, healthy company on its back after a long crucifixion.
What motivated, or rather frustrated, this man from the middle? The man who, as a "small mid-sized company", as he puts it, successfully but disillusionedly buries his healthy business and makes over thirty employees redundant.
These employees, with one exception, even understand his decision.
What is going on in a country where commitment is no longer rewarded? What is going on in a country where energetic entrepreneurs see a lack of meaning in their actions and seek salvation in the suicide of their company? How far must the depression have progressed?
Robert Musil wrote this beautiful sentence:
"In times of bankruptcy, the soul prefers the hereafter."
Seen in this light, we have been living in a state of creeping bankruptcy for a long time. We have been seeing intellectual insolvency in many places in the country for years.
There, where poets and thinkers only crawl and crawl.
Where subtlety and the ventilation of ideas had its home. Where people were open to new ideas. Where enthusiasm, a spirit of optimism and innovation were part and parcel of the German soul, there are often only the urns in which all these virtues and more were laid to rest. Finally doused with the all-equalizing, sticky federal burger sauce of political correctness.
I picked up the phone and called him. The e-mail man. I asked about his state of mind. I didn't get much to say, which is good. You won't read what you hear in the interview in any of the leading media. You won't hear or see it on any of the channels you have to pay for. Not in the private ones anyway.
Journalism begins where something is described and published that others do not want to be reported. Everything else is propaganda. This attitude has been attributed to various journalists for a hundred years, and I am adopting it here and now. That's why the interview is online. Let's see how much longer.
I confess! I briefly hesitated to publish this interview because during the course of the conversation, the e-mail man says something that I know is currently considered unspeakable in parts of our population and that people might try to accuse me of being one of them.
Since I am neither one of those nor of them and always try to free myself from the shackles of framing, it was only logical to publish this interview. But the fact that I briefly "flinched" at publishing it frightened me, because there is something frightening about this reflex. It is the harbinger of a democratic infarction.
Thank you for your Support of independent journalism in Germany.
English 
German 
Spanish
52 Responses
I also have a small store which I closed after the first 3 months and will not open again.
I can confirm every word they say. We keep Germany running and get our asses kicked for it, we're bullied and under general suspicion.
S.O.S. is the perfect headline.
I learned once (in short form): We have a representative democracy with a separation of powers and a Basic Law that contains our fundamental rights in individual articles. Our representatives in the legislature are elected and are subject only to their conscience. The fourth power in the state is the press.
And now my current perception:
1. it is precisely the politics of the last 25 years that have once again tied the Federal Republic of Germany more closely into international treaties that would make it impossible for today's actors to organize anything other than what is written in these treaties - even if they wanted to (state constitution or not). Without asking, our politicians have locked us into a system that can now encroach more and more on our freedoms. Constitutional courts merely wave through the international legal obligations and find reasons why everything is fine. The same applies to other countries around the world, especially in Europe.
2 And the politicians, our administrations, the police and the courts execute all of this in painstaking detail. They are "just doing their job". The Milgram experiment is an excellent example of how the whole machinery works. There it was a vivid experiment, here and today people's behavior can be observed in real time, e.g. how willing they are to torment others (children are now tested several times a week by nasal swabs from the back of the throat - administrative courts think that's ok! This only makes politicians even bolder in their disregard for civil liberties). You just have to be prepared to appreciate what you see. The sense of proportion, of appropriateness, has been lost.
3) Whoever manages to bring the media into line, as we are experiencing today, has all the levers in their hands to "dare" democracy (or to let it degenerate into a mere empty phrase?). Daily infiltration is guaranteed via the media - especially during lockdown! "It's all for our own good".
There is nothing accidental about any of this. We should be able and have the courage to recognize systems when we see them. This is especially true when we cannot prove who is ultimately pulling the strings.
All conspiracy theory? Please read a few examples:
https://www.bmu.de/themen/klima-energie/klimaschutz/internationale-://www.bmu.de/themen/klima-energie/klimaschutz/internationale-klimapolitik/kyoto-protokoll/
https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/nachhaltigkeitspolitik/agenda-2030-die-17-ziele
https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/themen/internationale-gesundheitspolitik/global/who.html
https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/europa/die-europaeischen-vertraege-328824
Most people don't know what is regulated in detail. And when they do find out, the answer is: why, it's been in our program for years! And then they (sometimes) realize that they have been wonderfully distracted by the Bundesliga season or the Tagesschau. Dear quality media: you're not doing your job here!
4 Of course, managing things in this way comes at a price. But the money is there. First of all, large foundations selflessly help with large sums of money. If central banks then buy bonds and, in some countries, shares, they can put their self-produced money into circulation and inflate everything. And even more money is available.
5 Anyone who can now influence a central bank (read up on this: e.g. "The Creature from Jekyll Island") can practically dictate the economic cycle. They can "save" whoever they want and let others go under. He can create or burst asset bubbles and he can ensure that everyone who is good and helps participates a little without anyone noticing. In this way, it might also be possible to steer the policy of a country or the European Union or ....
6 At some point, the interim result will be a huge mountain of costs. Who will bear the costs incurred?
7. a seamless tax surveillance state will certainly distribute the costs "fairly". This will also help to eliminate "social injustice" in this world. You only have to listen to the sounds in our quality media to get an idea of what is yet to come.
I believe that nobody can stop the train today. And I believe that some other people are making similar observations to me. And the whole thing is not limited to Germany either. So emigrating is not a solution for me either.
What's left for me? To try,
- to reject unreasonable demands wherever possible,
- to make use of their own scope of judgment in the sense of freedom and appropriateness,
- to defend myself with all my strength against state and other encroachment,
- to stay happy in the here and now. There is more reason to be happy than I sometimes think (watching a good soccer match very consciously - maybe too)
HIKING OUT!
But where to?
Does anyone have a tip?
Thank you in advance ♡♡♡♧♧♧
Iceland ?
https://www.spiegel.de/karriere/island-eine-deutsche-auswanderin-erzaehlt-vom-leben-in-akureyri-a-1218139.html
I have been living in the Netherlands for 4 years. It's a beautiful country, not far from Germany and yet very different socially and economically. A big advantage is that everyone speaks very good English and buying property is also very easy. Almost everyone owns at least one property here in the course of their lives. The country is in a much better economic position than Germany and has not taken in so many migrants in the past (let's be honest, the >1 million migrants were/are an enrichment for Germany?!), so the environment and society in general looks much more European than in Germany. Here it also counts much more that you achieve a certain performance, there is no safety net that feeds you all your life. You also have a lot more net left over. I could write more here, but basically emigration is a very individual decision. When I look at our EU society, the NL no longer seems like paradise to me either, Rutte is implementing 1:1 what Merkel is doing, perhaps with the proviso that the tendency to relax is somewhat higher. From today's point of view, I would possibly prefer Australia/Canada, both big enough to have peace and quiet somewhere remote and there is also a very important advantage: Both are far away from the EU.
Avoid Australia, which has seen the worst undemocratic effects in recent times!
Very good interview, clear words from a clear-thinking person. Thank you Mr. Langemann!
Emigrate?
It won't work this time, as it did in 1933, for example.
Why? Because it is a global agenda.
The elites have declared war on the inconvenient masses. Humanity is to be reduced to a number of 500,000,000-max. 2,000,000,000 people. These are to be completely monitored and controlled and no longer capable of reproducing.
The masses are destroying the planet and the elites want to continue to drive around undisturbed in their private jets, yachts and submarines, but we are only a nuisance. And showing solidarity and restricting themselves is of course not an option for them. It makes more sense to destroy the masses and reduce them to the required number of work slaves.
Conspiracy? No, you can read about it in the works of the elite moderator Klaus Schwab (WeltWirtschaftsForum), "COVID-19: The Great Reset", "the future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution". You don't have to buy this garbage, it's enough to read the negative reviews on amazon to understand what it's all about. Humanity as we know it is to be abolished, keyword transhumanism, very gruesome, Matrix 1 sends its regards... Aaron Russo already pointed out decades ago that it is the Rockefellers' plan to chip people. In the meantime, the technology is so advanced that (vaccinated?) nanobots can connect to cell phones...
Every EU country is not an option, as the EU is a construct of the elites that will sooner or later destroy all democracy. The Treaty of Lisbon already made it clear what was in store for us. According to this, it is possible to reintroduce the death penalty to quell riots or in the event of war... but we should not be afraid of death, only of slavery.
The US is not an option as it is de facto not a constitutional state, see wars of aggression in violation of international law and covert operations using tactical nukes (most recently in the port of Beirut, see video of the explosion, mushroom shaped), more black people are in private prisons than black people have been in slavery, which is de facto slavery), third countries are not an option.
The only thing that helps is to show solidarity, to exercise civil disobedience. Start by freeing yourself from the harmful psychological and physical compulsion to wear a mask, even if you have to accept fines, legal disputes before the administrative court cost nothing, and you can always appeal against the fine there. It is easy to prove that (FFP2) masks are harmful to health.
To participate in every demo (no matter if lateral thinking or other shady organizations, it is about 1 common goal, to abolish the Corona dictatorship, possibly even peacefully storming the Bundestag, the emphasis is on peaceful!
We are many, they are few! If we realize that, and only then, do we have a chance of surviving.
Gunter, I can only agree with you. I've been writing about your last sentences here for months. But which demos should you still go to? To Berlin, Stuttgart, Dresden.... Where we live (Meiningen in southern Thuringia) there were big demonstrations at the fall of the Berlin Wall, despite the Stasi. Today there are 20 to 40 people and 15 policemen there. It's totally pointless. The innkeepers, shopkeepers, parents of kindergarten children or pupils, teachers, fitness owners, self-employed people, etc., where are they all? Where are all these people?
I'm about to lose my courage. The crazy government, including the prime minister, want to enslave us. That's all there is to it. And you will see,
the Bundestag approves Mrs. Merkel's latest "authorization nonsense for the whole of Germany" again. The ladies and gentlemen of parliament are all paid punctually and handsomely! But at some point the money will run out. Perhaps the "German Michel" will finally stand up and take to the streets? But what else has to happen ...? Civil war?
Yes, there are many of us, but many of us are in the police, military, judiciary, government offices, politics, press, radio and TV. The sad remainder are either neutral, disinterested or capable of understanding. The remaining number is still divided, which makes the potential number of qualified opponents seem much smaller.
I can recommend emigrating from the outside to the inside; that is where you will find your life and from there you can defend this inner space: we can decide what goes into our mouth and what comes out of it and then immediately goes back into our ears. Therefore, pay most attention to the mouth, keeping control there also relaxes the ears in the long run and every world, however horrible it may seem, can shine as it is right now.
Human beings are part of a destructive horde, regardless of whether they are born in North Korea, Costa Rica, Iceland or even Germany. We cannot escape it, unless by suicide or diaspora into loneliness, which requires extremely difficult survival conditions, as basically any participation or cooperation with the horde is simply collaboration!
There are no "bad", no "good" people, but only parts of the horde in their respective function, position, in short, horde situation - from starving infants to multi-billionaires!
Humans are intrinsically social creatures that extrinsically degenerate into ruthless cannibals, either of their direct neighbors or indirectly of distant conspecifics, but always of a desecrated fellow world.
Personally, I am convinced that the horde is led exclusively by psychopaths, i.e. seriously mentally ill sociopaths, and that the means of violence are used to make the masses compliant and turn them into murderers.
To sum up, most of us put on rose-colored glasses and in our latitudes the probability of being able to live a pleasant and even happy life with them is relatively high. However, nobody should feel sorry for themselves if they get caught out and end up in the shit without mercy - that's part of the lot for most people on the planet, some from the very first day of their lives.
Those who "work their way up" can either count on their own psychopathic abilities, or they are equipped with truly sought-after talents that allow them to be smart, helpful people who never really sink their tusks into the flesh of their fellow human beings at any moment in their lives, but who generally mutate into consumption-addicted and status-crazed monsters just like the most disgusting psychopath.
No, we no longer have a chance, we as a species are simply hopelessly degenerated, we will probably not only have caused the next great species extinction on the Earth's agenda, but a transformation that a gigantic asteroid impact could not have brought about more thoroughly.
Our bodies want to live, our hearts beat valiantly in the darkness, our true dreams are those of harmony and affection, but reality condemns us to helpless instruments of madmen!
What you write is so right. Especially the observation that the belief in a system as it once existed and as it was taught initially encouraged people to persevere, only to be bitterly disappointed. Event 201, Agenda 2030, Great Rest and whatever they are all called are the system. And we can only conclude that we are caught in a web of international treaties that is being tightened a little more every day. And how do the masses of our fellow human beings react? They go through every freedom-restricting insanity in detail-loving consistency in order to "just do my job" here and there. If you google the Milgram experiment, you'll see how it works.
Good evening everyone, for confirmation see Egon W. Kreuzer's website on the progress of job destruction. 1.4 million jobs are already gone before the wave of bankruptcies in Germany. Very good table there. Mr. Busch hits the nail on the head several times. You can find something better than death anywhere. We have also said goodbye to this country internally and are gone when the relatives who need our care have died with dignity.
... Austrian School of Economics. (Loosely quoted)
"I recommend withdrawing support from the tyrant and you will see his base crumble and he will fall!"
We have long since hit the "wall".
Only the impact is suppressed. YET!
The money printing press makes it possible today and your accumulated wealth tomorrow.
(For a short time)
What do we hear on the radio?
"Gender/(=destruction of language and thus identity)..... Climate, "in 200 years you'll see, the politicians were right"(=in 200 years these bums won't be alive, neither will we. Ergo, a wonderful instrument of power)
....Corona, justifies EVERYTHING!!!!!......
And finally, one thing must not be missing:
We Nazi !!!!!!
The eternal debt !!!!!!!!!
(My Israeli friends now pity me for this and comfort me)
But fortunately for us miserable people, we are being richly enriched. (=destruction of our identity and established virtues)
Conclusion: "It took a long time to create it. Just a snap of the fingers to destroy it"
(Just to clarify for the "good guys" out there: "I know this is a drastic description. And with all possible exceptions, it describes the direction)
Hello
Thank you very much for the great interview. Rarely has someone spoken so much from my soul. I came to the same decision six months ago and left Germany with my family on April 1, 2021. I closed my company and am starting over somewhere else. Ultimately, I'm doing it for my children, a country where children are locked up, deprived of their basic right to education, chased off football pitches and toboggan runs by the police, a country like that is no longer worth a single day of my working time.
Farewell!
Hello Thomas,
We also want to leave D but we don't know ...where to?!
Where do you restart?
Best wishes and all the best
Thomas&Conny
https://paraguay-auswandern.info/erfahrungen/
Bravo. I'm currently setting the course for Portugal.
Only the right people need to hear that now. But whether that would do any good is another matter
I can only agree with Mr. Busch. However, the fact that Mr. Busch refers to Mr. Merz as a competent politician does not fit. Mr. Merz stands for Blackrock, the cause of all the evil of our time. What an evil game is taking place here. The WerteUnion would like to see Mr. Merz as chancellor. The current chancellor is even more harmless.
Yes, the bearer of hope may not actually be one. Let's be honest. German politicians do what they are told from elsewhere. This corona madness shows that all too clearly. It's not a German issue, but someone else has taken control here. In Spain this is being tried out, in Italy that and in Germany this again, and so on. There is a system in this confusion. The call for uniform rules (socialist basis no. 1) is getting louder and louder. First in the federal states, then in the EU. Whoever is the driving force, every "bearer of hope" will ultimately do what they are told.
I agree, and Germany is of central geopolitical importance.
Nevertheless, our political puppets (every single one of them!) have taken an oath!
Anyone who has ever driven into a desert knows the "point of no return", where there is no longer enough fuel to turn back. Our government, and even large sections of the opposition, have already gone far beyond this point with their coronavirus strategy. A turnaround has long been ruled out. The fourth wave will mark the wave of bankruptcy. The only thing left for Laschet, Söder, Göring-Eckardt, Esken & Co to do is to pull it off in order to reach the saving shore of black-green or green-red-red eco-socialism before this wave of foreseeable bankruptcies with a "bridge lockdown" that lasts until the election. Other options have long since been ruled out of the discussion or are unrealistic. In any case, the road back to freedom and prosperity will be extremely hard and rocky after the general election. Many will fall by the wayside, as will landscapes, nature and even the climate. Socialism has never had a talent for promoting people and effectively protecting the environment. The sooner people realize this, the better.
...it is probably also the media that are cutting a swathe through politics - through one-sided promotion...so that the parade cannot get through...
As H.Maaßen says: the media are part of the problem...
It is more obvious than ever that the press and media have a problem conveying part of reality truthfully to their readers and viewers. This concerns Corona, but not only Corona. This phenomenon is particularly widespread when it comes to reporting on climate change and climate protection.
They are supported by a large number of organizations and associations as well as state authorities, above all the Federal Environment Agency. For example, the Federal Environment Agency explains on its homepage why so-called "climate deniers" are wrong and why volcanism only plays a minor role in the CO2 balance (see https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/service/uba-fragen/uebersehen-die-klimatologen-die-vulkanischen):
Excerpt from the line of argument published by the Federal Environment Agency: "From the fact that the atmospheric CO2 concentration has remained roughly constant over the last 10,000 years or so (approx. 280 +/- 10 ppm), it follows that volcanic CO2 emissions must be insignificant compared to human emissions. In fact, human CO2 emissions (in particular through the use of fossil fuels, deforestation, firewood use, cement production, etc.) have risen to more than 41 billion tons of CO2 per year during the industrial age (as of 2018). Volcanic CO2 emissions, on the other hand, are much lower. They amount to around 0.3 to 0.6 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year, which corresponds to 0.7 to 1.5 percent compared to human emissions."
That sounds plausible at first. However, if you do the math, even without any knowledge of higher mathematics, you will find that volcanoes have emitted 3000 to 6000 billion tons of CO2 in the last 10,000 years, which is about 1.3 to 2.6 times as much CO2 as humans have emitted by burning fossil fuels or slash-and-burn since the beginning of the industrial revolution: about 2340 billion tons of CO2 (s. https://wiki.bildungsserver.de/klimawandel/index.php/Kohlendioxid-Konzentration). So although volcanoes have obviously been emitting huge amounts of CO2 for millions of years, the CO2 concentration has been falling continuously for around 50 million years. From around 1500 ppm to 280 ppm in the pre-industrial world.
Two questions therefore arise:
1. how is this possible?
The CO2 discussion tends to conceal the fact that the formation of calcareous layers in particular, but also fossil deposits, binds vast amounts of CO2. If volcanoes were to emit as much CO2 as is currently in the Earth's atmosphere over a period of just 10,000 to 20,000 years, life on Earth would not be possible. As volcanic activity is far less intense today than it was in the days of the dinosaurs, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has steadily decreased. This only changed with modern man and his technology. So far, our emissions have postponed this process of CO2 degradation in the Earth's atmosphere by around 10 million years into the future.
2. is life on earth much more dependent on the supply of CO2 than the press, media, politicians, the Federal Environment Agency and climate researchers are prepared to admit?
Yes, after all, without CO2 there is no photosynthesis and therefore no higher-value life on earth. So-called C3 plants, i.e. 90% plants on earth, stop growing completely below around 120....130 ppm due to a lack of CO2. (s. https://bildungsserver.hamburg.de/klimawandel-und-landwirtschaft-nav/2203496/kohlendioxid/)
If the earth has no gully for CO2, these indisputable facts allow only the following conclusions:
Decreasing volcanic activity poses the greatest threat to life on earth due to decreasing CO2 emissions. In the last 6 million years, the CO2 content has continuously decreased from 385 ppm to 280 ppm (see https://bildungsserver.hamburg.de/treibhausgase/6088114/kohlendioxid-erdgeschichte/ - see Fig.: "The carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere over the last 65 million years"). Extrapolated linearly, it would therefore only have taken another 10 million years or so for life on Earth to go into a dangerous permanent hibernation.
SUMMARIZED:
Life on earth is undoubtedly dependent on the CO2 drip of volcanoes, whether the ideologies of the Federal Environment Agency, the Greens, various NGOs, including Greenpeace, FfF and the ÖRR want to admit this idea or not. The fact that humans are more than compensating for a dangerous trend through decreasing volcanism is more of an opportunity than a risk for life on earth in the long term. CO2, which currently makes up around 0.042% of the Earth's atmosphere, is still a rare building block of all life on Earth and not a pollutant, as many protagonists of the restructuring of our society would have us believe.
Dear Mr. Langemann and team,
If you could replace the sentence above "If the volcanoes were to emit about as much CO2 as is currently in the Earth's atmosphere every 5,000 to 10,000 years......." with the following formulation: "If the volcanoes did not emit about as much CO2 as is currently in the Earth's atmosphere every 5,000 to 10,000 years, life on Earth would not be possible." I would be very grateful. After all, only true words should be spoken here. The 10,000 to 20,000 years was too conservative an assumption and refers to both the CO2 in the earth's atmosphere and the CO2 dissolved in the oceans.
To understand:
The earth's surface area is 5100 million km². The weight of the column of air above one square kilometer is just under 10 million tons, as can easily be calculated from the air pressure of 1 bar = 1kp/cm². In total, the earth's atmosphere weighs about 5 x 10 to the power of 15 tons. 100 ppm therefore corresponds to one ten-thousandth of this weight or 5 x 10 to the power of 11 tons equals 500 billion tons. Since the molecular weight of CO2 at 44 g/mol is about 1.4 times as high as the molecular weight of air (approx. 31 g/mol), 100 ppm CO2 therefore weighs about 700 billion tons. All CO2 molecules in the Earth's atmosphere (approx. 420 ppm) therefore currently weigh around 3,000 billion tons, i.e. exactly the same amount of CO2 that volcanism emits at the current level every 5,000 to 10,000 years, according to the Federal Environment Agency.
As you can see, the lies of the Federal Environment Agency, climate research, etc. only have to be big enough and the stigmatization deterrent enough for no one to actually think about the true situation. The so-called fact-checkers then refer to the statements of the Federal Environment Agency. This cements the lie.
Dear Dr. Assmann,
Thank you for your comments. I have repeatedly explained years ago that volcanism has played one of the main roles in CO2 emissions in the Earth's history and that, compared to the present age, for example in the Mesozoic, considerably more CO2 was released into the atmosphere through volcanism. The fact that CO2 plays a significant role as a greenhouse gas is controversial, even if the mass media and politicians do not want to admit it, and even the greenhouse effect is not completely undisputed. However, one thing is certain: all our lives on this planet depend on a sufficient amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. In my opinion, the demonization of this gas is one of the most critical pieces of disinformation of our age. And no, I do not profit in any way from the oil/gas industry.
With best regards,
Martin Kolm
Today a small article in the BILD (seen by chance on the counter at the butcher): A UN study would claim that Germans (or people) would be happier today than before Corona...
So in times of aberration, study has degenerated into a non-word...
Science as a lie in the guise of credibility!
Can make you sick.....
"The coronavirus pandemic is plunging many people into a deep crisis. At the same time, however, it is also an opportunity to find a new answer to the question of a happy life." (s. https://www.zdf.de/dokumentation/dokumentation-sonstige/gluecklich-krise-online-100.html)
There is no clearer way to articulate his motivation for corona reporting. Neither Honecker & Co. nor East German television could have put it better than ZDF when it came to talking up the GDR prison. Even Honecker, Krenz & Co. would not have dared to publicly demand more severity for their own population, as Daniel Günther, CDU Minister President of Schleswig-Holstein, did tonight in the Tagesthemen under obvious pressure from the ARD editor interviewing him. Our politicians and the ÖRR in particular are increasingly degenerating. Our formerly exemplary liberal-democratic society is slipping away from us. Alongside the ÖRR, spineless CDU/CSU politicians who do not dare to offer our former GDR functionary sufficient resistance to the dismantling of civil rights are responsible.
...the wave of bankruptcies will come when the lockdown is over and many companies will then feel the liquidity bottlenecks...less tax revenue for the state, which has long since eaten up the reserves (which ones actually?) and will then no longer be able to pay short-time work benefits or Hartz4. And then? The social gap will widen like in third-world countries - adée middle class.
Against the backdrop of a spreading, dangerous disease, you might just be able to bear what's going on. Against the backdrop of inflated incidence figures and 80% mild courses, it is unbearable. The next government - and generation(s) - will have to foot the bill. In fact, the perpetrators should have their noses stuck in their own mud like young dogs.
PS: Managers of the economy would have been fired long ago with this kind of bias and would be liable...where is the supervisory board of the state?
I can well understand Mr. Busch's frustration, but his conclusions are rather confused.
A lot of things are thrown together that don't belong together.
If I have understood correctly, his company has come under pressure as a result of the measures and its existence is threatened. The big question is whether this is condoned or planned by politicians. But how can the seizure of power by large transnational corporations, organized by Klaus Schwab's WEF and others, have anything to do with socialism? "You will own nothing and you'll be happy" begs the question of who owns the rest!
In many cases, the old political guard hadn't "learned" anything either (apart from "political science" perhaps, Helmut Kohl).
However, its experience of the world war meant that it was more focused on the common good.
Mr. Merz in the Ministry of Economics or, God forbid, in the Chancellery would only mean that Blackrock sits directly in the government and the train only increases speed but does not change direction. Besides, he is a lawyer, which means that economics is not his thing either.
Many entrepreneurs talk about business acumen and mean business management. But that has no place in a government. It's about economic "global control" (Karl Schiller). The relationships are usually counter-intuitive.
Dear money: For over 20 years, politicians have withdrawn from active fiscal policy and believe they can control the economy through the monetary policy of the "independent" central bank (experts!) (monetarism). The result is very low growth and productivity development on the verge of deflation. The decisive factor is the real and not the nominal interest rate.
The Greens are not a left-wing party, but a neoliberal, transatlantic-bellicist party in a progressive guise with identity elements (LGBT, "climate change"). They are no longer even an environmental party, because they are now in favor of American fracking gas against NS2, are no longer against genetically modified food, etc. They are not even an environmental party.
So what to choose? I'm pretty clueless about that too. AfD is out of the question for me, though. Basis is my favorite.
It should be clear that a constellation of black/green, green/black, traffic light means a confirmation of the current policy.
Yes, yes... the plundering state doesn't leave a berry on the bush, but cuts off the root in headless greed!
Harry Busch speaks from my soul, but I would like to add an important aspect to the image of the burnt-out entrepreneur:
The taxation of equity capital formation.
If Busch has created 30 jobs in 30 years, then every year he has created a job for another person from money that he has earned and paid tax on, i.e. from his private coffers.
And then he has to be beaten up for saying that he would have a luxury problem with €100k to pay tax on...
Among other things, I studied agriculture and even after 35 years I still remember the sentence of our accounting luminary Prof. Schmaunz:
"It is actually unfair that the farmer has to pay tax on his equity capital formation.
Equity formation serves to maintain the job as a basis for securing a livelihood.
Every employee may deduct expenses incurred to secure their livelihood from tax as income-related expenses."
Busch and many of his entrepreneurial colleagues not only pay tax on their own business expenses, but also on those of their current and future employees. And for this he has to be beaten up in the media as a super-rich exploiter. Against this backdrop, it takes a lot of fun at work and hard mental repression to fight burnout for 30 years. Like me, he realized during the 2008 financial crisis that our society - including the self-proclaimed "stakeholders" - would do the devil to recognize this, let alone reward it.
Fate has placed a left-turning Seat Ibiza right in front of my bike, so I don't have to justify my burnout to anyone.
Today I am faced with the problem that Justice does not want to imagine that a farmer suffers damage if he can only work at half throttle for 1200 hours a year instead of 3500 hours at full throttle.
Urban arrogance: potatoes grow by themselves, electricity comes from the socket, milk bubbles in a Tetra pack.
We have an urban luxury perception problem. It's not just about "spending other people's money" - money is just a social construct. It's about consuming other people's created real substance and productive substance. You can live on a slaughtered cow for a long time. But afterwards there is neither milk nor calf.
A wise society understood this and kept self-preservation in balance. This was once called sustainability.
But even this term has been usurped by substance-eating looters.
History shows that social learning cycles extend over generations.
And learning only takes place under pain.
Against this background, Harry Busch's life decision is the only sensible one.
mfg Wolfgang Rosner
Dipl.-Ing. agr. (FH), Master of Business Administration, organic farmer
Hello Mr. Rosner,
> "We have an urban luxury perception problem. It's not just about "spending other people's money" - money is just a social construct. It's about consuming other people's created real substance and productive substance. You can live on a slaughtered cow for a long time. But afterwards there is neither milk nor calf.
A wise society understood this and kept self-preservation in balance. This was once called sustainability.
But even this term has been usurped by substance-eating looters."
I find this part very well expressed and would like to agree with it. What I always miss in the general talk about "markets" is that we are people who are dependent on food and shelter and should, as far as possible, not make ourselves completely dependent on other countries to supply us with food. It is very, very strange for me to experience this because I grew up with self-sufficient parents.
However, an entrepreneur is never alone, he alone does not "create" jobs. Without his employees, he would never be able to do what he does when things are going well. If you are a good entrepreneur, you want to involve your people not only emotionally but also financially. This automatically places more responsibility on everyone.
Greetings to you.
Thank you for this interview. It's always interesting to hear voices from the field.
Did I understand that correctly? The entrepreneur is closing the business despite the existing order situation? ... I can of course understand that without planning security, the perceived risk increases. And before you go bankrupt with your eyes wide open and end up sitting on a mountain of debt, it's better to pull the plug first.
If we didn't have the relationship where an entrepreneur alone bears the risk for his business and no "employees" who bear no risk, except that they could become unemployed, but instead have a stake in the company and are also jointly liable, then the situation would be different. But basically, the way we all live is questionable and has been for far longer than the last twenty years. It's not just politicians who are managing themselves, everyone else is doing the same. Apparently there is nothing to do, everything has already been done. People are feverishly searching for "new markets" in this system and are finding them. The new market is man himself: his body and his mind, which must now serve the "common good" and give itself up for exploitation: his body serves medicine as a source of revenue, but not only through medication and vaccinations, worse still, through his organs, his reproduction, his body cells, everything about him can be exploited and the new markets are flourishing, both in his real and his digital existence. Everything is backwards. What is bad is good, what is good is bad.
All you really want to do is flee from this monstrous existence. And those who can still afford it do so. Mr. Busch briefly said that he goes where he can provide himself with food. "Off grid" is probably also a model that many people who no longer want to or can no longer rely on the government and their fellow human beings are striving for.
All those who still deny that terrible things await them will still do so when the most terrible things have reached them and will still be convinced, even in death, that it must have been the right thing to do.
What remains for me is that I at least remain true to myself and have no choice but to accept everything that awaits me: Unemployment, total dependence on my personal environment and drawing from this the humility that I am not alone in this world that seems to have gone mad before my eyes. I don't give in to the testing practices or the vaccination. But my son does and will continue to do so. He has no other choice if he wants to have a life in which he still has the illusion of freedom.
I feel real freedom because I don't participate. As sad as it is and as painful as it is, losing my job, my social life, is the price I pay for still being able to look at myself in the mirror. I don't really have a choice: I can't help it. The reasons are manifold and not always so clear, because in many cases you don't have short, clear sentences and words, but rather a hunch and an interpretation. I can't ethically justify my current actions, because in order to function in my work I would have to constantly tell other people how they should behave. I can't do that. It's undignified and I want to preserve my own dignity and that of my fellow human beings.
Dear Erika,
I agree with you here 🙂
Best regards and thank you for your comment.
Dear Mr. Linsner,
I'm pleased to hear that, and I'm honored that you differentiate.
I would also like to thank you and send you my regards 🙂
@ Erika, chapeau. I couldn't have put it better. LG
I can relate very well to what Mr. Busch said. I have been an entrepreneur in the IT sector since the early 90s. Software development for Internet applications (yes, it already existed back then - but it wasn't on the radar in Germany for a long time), a small company. Even back then, Germany was in the Middle Ages in this respect, which is why I served foreign customers with my small company at 99% (payment morale was another reason). Unfortunately, this has not changed over time. We are still hopelessly behind and there is no will to improve (you don't always have to be first, but the will to progress....). A constant battle against windmills. Although it worked well with foreign customers, I closed my company after 20 years. As technicians, we were drowning in German bureaucracy. The orders also became increasingly unethical, and at some point it was no longer justifiable (surveillance, profiling, nudging via apps). I then spent a few years in research (computer graphics), self-financed or subsidized from my savings. But in the end, even there it was just pure ideology and bureaucracy. I have now been an IT officer in a public authority for two years (at least according to the job description). I also had the foreknowledge that things would go wrong (partly due to my international relationships with the really big IT companies) and I moved into the public sector. Exactly for the reasons Mr. Busch mentioned. You put in years of hard work, work yourself to the bone and are only ridiculed by some morons who haven't learned anything. These people are also to be found in the authorities. Technologically and operationally, I feel like I've been transported back to the Middle Ages. The level at which they operate there is unbelievable. I can contribute my skills (technical as well as organizational) to 0% there, with incompetence and sycophants everywhere you look. Abysmal intellectual depths that I could never have imagined (and I've seen a lot). But there is the secure 3000 euros net per month for doing nothing in the home office (and I don't just mean that proverbially). I don't feel particularly good about it, it's degrading and I'm sure I won't last long there. But I'm fed up with it all. Since voting doesn't help any more, and neither does demonstrating, this is my form of protest. Article 20/4, refusal to work, resistance. My energy and my knowledge, my contribution to society is not wanted. I've had enough, I don't want to contribute anything more to such a state and such a society. That's what I tell them - I've said goodbye to life. I'm already planning to emigrate. I haven't given up completely yet, but if things don't change for the better this year, I'll be gone too.
Too bad (if you left). We can use each other if we don't agree with the government's course. Have you ever thought about Die Basis? The party has been formed and even though we all know that it certainly won't turn the tide, being involved and working together and meeting under separate conditions is also a good change to feel effective in your ability (professionally and privately) and to contribute what you are good at. It's the first time that I've experienced something like this and that people mean it when they say "do what you do best. Don't ask the others first, but get active on your own initiative. The rest will follow." You certainly have a lot to contribute. You won't earn any money with it - as is always the case with new ventures. But if you have the energy and other support, you would certainly be welcome.
Greetings to you from Hamburg.
I see it the same way, my basis of work - retail - is being destroyed. My customers - retailers - can no longer do it.
The only solution is to emigrate, but to which country? It has to be outside Europe.
We who are alive are all in on it! I personally don't know anyone who can say they could survive without the horde. People who have inherited and live off their assets may no longer have to work, but very few of them use the money to buy a piece of land in order to survive at least halfway self-sufficiently.
People who receive handouts from the state are marginalized objects of the welfare industry and objects of the administrative machine.
People like this Mr. Busch only see their own problems and are hopelessly self-centered "doers" who don't understand that they were just lucky not to have fallen flat on their faces right at the beginning of their careers, who were just lucky in business but then got so greedy that they lost their lives in the hunt for cheap "wealth" - and yes, They are basically no less objects of the state and the system, they can not only spend a few hundred euros a month, but are allowed to consume a few thousand, perhaps tens of thousands a month - but as Mr. Busch himself notes, they are also the perfect hamsters in the hamster wheel!
However, this makes Mr. Busch an extremely destructive element in the game, as he has perfectly supported the destructive forces with his services and has himself delivered his veritable share, quite specifically.
Perhaps Mr. Busch will now find peace, he can reflect a little on his life (does he have a family?), perhaps he will save a few more hours of his life by planting a clever permaculture area, providing himself and his loved ones with tasty and healthy food, perhaps playing an instrument, having the time in the evening to forget the world behind him together with others after his day's work and simply enjoying life free of hatred and resentment.
But none of us can completely break out of this madness of the human hordes, only death can do that.
The psychopaths have us in their grasp, they will never release their useful creatures, they will not admit defeat either, if we were to show solidarity, they would immediately destroy the world with their nuclear bombs, which we build for them and which we maintain for them!
(Some hermits may still be self-sufficient somewhere on this planet and can actually survive without having to contribute to the madness).
Yes, unfortunately that's how it looks now. And unless someone with relevance intervenes here very soon with an iron fist (legally), I can't see the future. The individual citizen, if not strongly organized, will not be able to do anything here. I can't influence the climate if, for example, I no longer buy coffee-to-go and therefore don't throw away the paper cup. You can see it elsewhere in everyday life, how values and order are crumbling. Cars drive across a four-lane road in full traffic and park opposite in the opposite direction. At my uncomprehending look, the driver grins at me and says in broken German: "That's life"... Parks that used to be a flagship of the spa town are regularly littered at the weekend. When I complained to the head of the public order office, I received the friendly reply: "We'll keep an eye on it, but we don't want conditions like in Singapore"... (?) Or the driving school car parked in the absolute no-parking zone, obviously waiting for the next pupil or pizza. The driving instructor (yes, sorry, with a migration background) grins and shrugs his shoulders. What can I expect from a company like this? In the shoe window of a chic fashion store, there are now chic "everyday masks" from the designer again. The advertising slogan: "Take responsibility"...
Good night together.
You seem to blame other people, on whom you stick a label, for the fact that something like fatalism is spreading? Foreigners have always served as scapegoats, but they are not. The announcement from the public order office that you don't want to have conditions like in Singapore is not so wrong. What do you want? That dirt on the street should be punished even more severely and given social demerits, ostracism and fines? Then perhaps you are not so far removed from those who criticize you for advocating masks. It's just that you don't share this attitude. But if you are in favor of punishment, then ultimately you are always dependent on one camp setting out to punish the other. It is then only your luck or misfortune as to which camp you belong to. I may share the public disorder that you observe, but if dirt bothers me, I can pick it up and throw it away myself. And if cars are parked somewhere where they don't belong, that's not my business, it's the police's business.
I wish you a good day.
Hello, Erika,
I don't believe that Mr. Linsner had the intentions that you've made out, not at all. I can empathize with his feelings very well. You know, just because you criticize someone's behaviour and they weren't born in this country for whatever reason doesn't automatically make you someone who doesn't like foreigners! I have never been able to understand this new German way of thinking. I have spent half my working life abroad and have always tried to respect the local rules and customs! I still think that's right and sensible today. I don't want to have to renegotiate living together with whoever every day ...
And anyone who wishes for cleanliness and order in public spaces, as was normal 20-25 years ago, is certainly a long way from the usual customs in Singapore ... The answer to Mr. Linsner from the public order office is simply disrespectful and a reflection of today's society.
You write: "And if cars are parked somewhere where they don't belong, then that's not my business, it's the police's business." I agree with you in a legal sense, but that's not what I meant! There used to be such a thing as good manners, so-called good upbringing, setting an example and consideration. And along with that, respect for law and order, even without the police...
Thank you very much, Hubert, in this case you interpreted my intention exactly right. But I am also at peace with Erika, fortunately we have a really cultivated culture of discussion here with Mr. Langemann. Many greetings to all.
Mr. Linsner, you have quite rightly pointed out grievances and certain tendencies in our society. But you made a big mistake: you associated foreign citizens with certain negative behaviors. That is a no-go and you know it. What makes you write something like that? We Germans are to blame if a migrant does not behave in accordance with the law, because we have not created the necessary conditions to prevent such behavior. So it's our fault when migrants violate social norms. And pointing out this misbehavior is the worst thing you can do, Corona is child's play compared to the social ostracism that awaits you if it turns out that your insinuations actually correspond to your true convictions. Rethink your behavior.
With best regards,
Charles Smith (Dipl.Ing., Dipl. Kaufm, migrant background available)
I hope that some of your comments are to be understood as satire?
Hello Mr. Langemann, the person you are talking to is by no means an isolated case. I also have someone like that in my circle of friends. Just a year ago, his company, a steel construction company, was one of those companies that pay taxes in Germany. He employed 10 specialized welders and steel fabricators in the power plant sector.
After a period of short-time working due to the big "C", he simply closed his business, laid off the 10 employees and sold the inventory due to chronic unwillingness to work. The expensive certification in the trash. Rumor has it that more than 800,000 companies, i.e. 25-30% of commercial enterprises, are facing insolvency, which is just not being carried out. However, nobody has the countless businesses like the ones described here on their radar. They simply disappear without a trace. Only a comparison of annual statistics on registered businesses could shed light on this. People in the country will only understand when they realize that you can't eat PCR tests.
I see the whole thing as a socialist overthrow agenda in green garb, for which this supposed pandemic is only being used. Such "experiments" have claimed countless victims throughout history. It's time we put a stop to this!
Hello Mr. Jussen,
" socialist overthrow agenda in green garb", very true, also called the Great Reset.
With best regards,
Charles Smith