The interview on the performance of PCR tests is one of the most highly regarded interviews in this Days.
The Nobel laureate Prof. Dr. Ezekiel Okemwa wrote under Part 2 of the interview, which you can also find here in the Club and on YouTube:
"As UN civil society East Africa - UNGA 2020 award SDG pioneers - with 1.45 million members, we are very grateful for your remarks - ASANTE SANA. Prof. Dr. Ezekiel Okemwa (Nobel Prize Laureate - with Al-Gore)"
This interview was conducted on 17.9.2020 guided tour. The original video was first published on 18.9.2020 for all former e-mail subscribers to the "Club of Clear Words". On 19.9.2020 The interview was then made available to the international public on YouTube.
I am providing you with a transcript of the interview here.
You are welcome to reproduce and distribute this interview or forward it by e-mail. Please remain fair and always refer to the original source:
clubderklarenworte.de
Please also let us know in which context you plan to distribute it as a mass reproduction.
If you are convinced that an independent press is important in a pluralistic and democratic society, we would be pleased to receive appropriate support, with which we can operate servers, expand websites and procure information
Thank you very much
Yours
Markus Langemann
English 
German 
Spanish
19 Responses
It will probably turn out quite differently:
Indeed, despite all the evidence and high ranking officials in Germany Merkel is intending to lockdown Germany AGAIN! (see Merkel 2nd lockdown) German ministers warn that lockdowns kill more people than they save, yet Merkel ignores them, as well as Pfizer.
Grüezi,
Am I wrong? When saving the recommended video, I noticed that I had already downloaded it on 05/15/20. I can't remember the source. Then your statement that the interview was only conducted on 17.09.20 and first published on 18.09.20 cannot be correct, or did you only conduct this interview yourself on 17.09.20?
Otherwise, thank you for your work.
Kind regards
Matias B.
Hello Matias B. You are wrong! Thank you very much for your words of appreciation. M.L.
It must be possible to obtain an urgent court order to declare the government's entire CORONA action invalid immediately. The only and main reason is: generation of false test results through the PCR application.
Anyone can make a mistake. However, this mistake has too great an impact on the whole world for immediate action to be taken.
Dr. Fuellmich says at about minute 40 that no party opposed it. That is not correct. In the corresponding Bundestag session in March 2020, the AfD made the proposal to review the measures after 4 weeks and then adjust them or lift the state of emergency again. From the end of April, the parliamentary group has been trying to revise the pandemic declaration, but they are regularly outvoted by the block parties.
Is there a chance to get this translated into English so it can be read by a wider audience?
Google translation of transcript is one possibility
You can translate it by yourself with https://translate.google.com/
Several things could be mentioned as harmful effects of the masks:
1. communication with the hearing impaired: They prevent tilting reading
2. communication with children: When communicating with children, the facial expressions are also important, but thanks to the mask they are not recognizable
3. psychological effect: Some people perceive the thing as a "muzzle and have problems with it to express their opinion freely
4. acoustic communication problems: With the rag on your face, pronunciation often becomes less clear
5. increased CO2 rebreathing: According to a study from 2003, a significantly increased CO2 content in the blood was determined even in very healthy young people after half an hour with a (surgical) mask (but no reduced oxygen content). The increased CO2 content leads to limitations in physical performance, longer reaction times, poor concentration and, in some cases, poorer "manual coordination". Although the specification of the masks has been changed since then to reduce this effect (more "breathing past the mask"), there have been no investigations since then into what the whole thing looks like with the masks according to the new specification. There are never such tests for everyday masks, but for everyday masks there isn't even a binding specification ... Recommended not to wear surgical masks for longer than 30 minutes at a time and then dispose of the masks as special biological waste (price question: is this usually done?). In addition, masks must be changed as soon as they are soaked (through exhaled moisture, through sweat, ...). Will that be done? It is also recommended not to touch the masks with your hands when putting them on or taking them off or when wearing them in any place other than the straps. How little this is observed is something everyone can do in everyday life
admire.
6. masks that have been worn for a long time, disposable masks that have been used several times and / or soaked masks form a good breeding ground for germs of all kinds (bacteria, fungi, ...) and also allow viruses to remain intact for longer in this environment. Under such wearing conditions it is to be expected that one "breathe back" one's own germs, which may only be excreted in low concentration, in increased concentration over time and thus possibly endanger one's own health.
7. in addition, there are "incorrect handling" (see above, or also see this paper, in which the members of the Bundestag * expressly * recommend incorrect handling of the masks:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WAVA6cMzvY
or as a PDF: https://www.actuarium.de/hausmitteilung_corona_bundestag.pdf The recommendation to slide the mask under the chin, which in my opinion is completely incompatible with the recommendations of the RKI ...
These are just the points that come to mind spontaneously. There may be other points. There is also sufficient evidence in YouTube videos about the ineffectiveness of the masks for filtering aerosols (e.g. an experiment by an engineer with an "artificial head":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PFpRPEPtzE
and a demonstration by a Spanish specialist in anesthesia:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNZff3guLRw&t=4s
To point 1:
1. communication with the hearing impaired: you prevent tilt reading.
It should read "lips", not fags. So the translation is something like:
1. communication with the hearing impaired: They prevent LIP reading
I have two questions for the community:
a) Could someone give me a reference to a meaningful but concise document on the harmfulness of these shreds of fabric on the face?
b) Is a criminal complaint against the politicians conceivable?
Personally, I rigorously reject the crap, have a suitable certificate and argue tooth and nail with various block wardens and health apostles - so far always successfully.
There are several harmful effects of the masks:
1. communication with the hearing impaired: you prevent tilt reading
2. communication with children: When communicating with children, facial expressions are usually also important, but these are not recognizable thanks to the mask
3. psychological effect: some people perceive the thing as a "muzzle" and have problems expressing their opinions freely with it
4. acoustic comprehension problems: With the cloth on the face, pronunciation often becomes unclear
5. Increased CO2 rebreathing: According to a study from 2003, a significantly increased CO2 content in the blood was found even in healthy young people after just half an hour with a (surgical) mask (although not a reduced oxygen content). The increased CO2 content leads to reduced physical performance, prolonged reaction time, poor concentration and in some cases to impaired "manual coordination". Although the specification of the masks has been changed since then to reduce this effect (more "breathing past the mask"), there have been no studies since then to see what the whole thing looks like with the masks according to the new specification. There have never been such studies on everyday masks, but there is not even a binding specification for everyday masks ... It is therefore generally recommended not to wear surgical masks for longer than 30 minutes at a time and then to dispose of the masks as biological hazardous waste (price question: is this usually done?). In addition, masks must be changed as soon as they are soaked (by exhaled moisture, sweat, ...). Is this done? It is also recommended not to touch the masks with your hands when putting them on, taking them off or wearing them anywhere other than your hands. Everyone can see for themselves how little this is adhered to in everyday life
admire.
6. masks worn for a long time, disposable masks used several times and/or soaked masks form a good breeding ground for germs of all kinds (bacteria, fungi, ...) and also allow viruses to remain intact for longer in this environment. Under such wearing conditions, it is therefore to be expected that you will "breathe back" your own germs, which may only be excreted in low concentrations, in increased concentrations over time and thus possibly endanger your own health.
7. in addition, there is "incorrect handling" (see above, or see also this paper, in which incorrect handling of masks is even *explicitly* recommended for members of the Bundestag: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WAVA6cMzvY or as PDF: https://www.actuarium.de/hausmitteilung_corona_bundestag.pdf The recommendation to slide the mask under the chin seems particularly questionable, which in my opinion is completely incompatible with the recommendations of the RKI ...
These are just the points that come to mind off the top of my head. There may be other points as well. There is also enough evidence in youtube videos about the ineffectiveness of masks for filtering aerosols (e.g. an experiment by an engineer with an "artificial head":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PFpRPEPtzE
and a demonstration by a Spanish specialist in anesthesia:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNZff3guLRw&t=4s
https://www.focus.de/panorama/welt/vorfall-in-rheinland-pfalz-auf-dem-weg-nach-hause-woerther-schuelerin-bricht-in-bus-zusammen-und-stirbt_id_12411214.html
a) Images at 42:24 (the causes remain unknown, however!) https://www.bitchute.com/video/hGrdS6D89zOl/ COVIDIOCRACY
b) factually pointless, as the control points are occupied accordingly (otherwise would we have what we have?).
Hello Hans,
You can't say it any better than this neurologist.
Hopefully I can place the link here:
https://youtu.be/R5FjKIpkvIE
b: Surely you can join the class action somehow!
LG
Michael
NEWS RELEASE: Corona Transition evaluates dissertation by Prof. Christian Drosten
This could be exciting....
If the editors' reading comprehension is not even sufficient for simple statements that they have incorporated into their own text passages - not to mention their professional competence - what do they want to find in a thematically complex dissertation?
Here is another top comment from our top virologist from 2013 in an interview with Wirtschaftswoche about the MERS coronavirus at the time and the ingenious PCR test:
"...Yes, but the method is so sensitive that it can detect a single genetic molecule of this virus. If such a pathogen flits across a nurse's nasal mucosa for a day, for example, without her falling ill or noticing anything else, then she is suddenly a case of Mers. Where previously terminally ill people were reported, now suddenly mild cases and people who are actually perfectly healthy are included in the reporting statistics."
Source:
https://www.wiwo.de/technologie/forschung/virologe-christian-drosten-die-who-kann-nur-empfehlungen-aussprechen/9903228-2.html
Super interesting. The interview clearly shows that Mr. Drosten knows how to assess the PCR tests and the associated "infection figures" very well. This man should be beaten with his own weapons. Some virologists who are responsible for the fate of the entire human race seem to be suffering from memory loss.
Hi Martina,
Read the current report on Drosten's dissertation at Corona-Transition.org, which could be
also become highly explosive.
Greetings
Yodhen