by Dr. Johanna Weber
In a video secretly recorded by employees of the Project Veritas internet platform, a suspected Pfizer employee claimed that the company was deliberately producing mutations of the coronavirus, i.e. conducting so-called gain-of-function research [1]. Gain-of-function research involves investigating how viruses could change in order to become even more dangerous [2]. This is supposedly done with the aim of developing even better drugs and vaccines, but is also carried out in bioweapons research.
Although there are currently doubts in the vastness of the Internet as to whether the person named really works at Pfizer or not, it is striking that there are also an increasing number of reports that this person actually exists, and that an astonishing number of websites and references to this person have suddenly "disappeared", perhaps even been deliberately deleted [18, 19]. However, the name of the alleged Pfizer employee is clearly stated by Project Veritas on its own website as Jordon Trishton Walker. He stated unequivocally in the video that Pfizer was conducting gain-of-function research; only when he realized that he had been filmed did he revise this statement [1]. Irrespective of the identity of the person and the statements made in the video, there are also indications elsewhere that Pfizer is conducting corresponding research.
Although Pfizer later denied this [3], a closer reading of Pfizer's statement on this incident reveals that Pfizer did indeed conduct research into new virus mutations, both in the form of computer simulations and on real viruses in the laboratory [3]. According to Pfizer, this research has not only been carried out on already known worrying variants, but parts of the virus have also been specifically modified by Pfizer for this purpose, e.g. to test whether the modified viruses are more resistant to drugs [3]. According to a statement by the physician Dr. Robert Malone [20], it is undisputed that this is gain-of-function research, because according to Malone, what Pfizer claims to be doing in the statement corresponds quite precisely to the definition of gain-of-function research, as can also be found on wikipedia [2, 3, 20, 21]. A virus against which a drug, in this case PAXLOVID®, is no longer effective is definitely more harmful than before and has thus been specifically improved in its function, as Pfizer also describes: "In a limited number of cases when a full virus does not contain any known gain of function mutations, such virus may be engineered to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells." [3].
According to various sources, the USA has been involved in gain-of-function research worldwide since 2014. Although it was prohibited in 2014 to conduct this research in US military laboratories on US territory [4], the USA continues to fund this type of research, namely at various locations outside the USA (Wuhan, Ukraine, ...), and according to various sources, sometimes even in direct cooperation with Pfizer [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22]. It is therefore indisputable that both Pfizer and the USA are conducting this type of research, as both have confirmed this themselves [3, 4, 10, 22], so it simply does not matter what a secretly filmed alleged employee says about this.
Regardless of whether Jordon Trishton Walker works at Pfizer or not, Pfizer itself clearly admitted in its statement of 27.01.2023 that it conducts gain-of-function research, and according to its own government, the USA is also happily funding this type of research abroad, even if "only" in the context of bioweapons defense [4, 22]. Riding around on the identity of a suspected Pfizer employee is therefore nothing but a distraction. This type of research is definitely taking place at Pfizer, and the USA is also conducting corresponding studies.
Sources
[1] https://www.projectveritas.com/news/pfizer-executive-mutate-covid-via-directed-evolution-for-company-to-continue/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain-of-function_research
[3] https://www.pfizer.com/news/announcements/pfizer-responds-research-claims
[4] https://www.infosperber.ch/politik/und-doch-labors-in-ukraine-forschten-mit-b-kampfstoffen/
[5] https://www.anti-spiegel.ru/2022/russland-big-pharma-namentlich-pfizer-ist-an-der-us-biowaffenforschung-beteiligt/
[6] https://www.anti-spiegel.ru/2022/die-ergebnisse-meiner-recherche-reise-im-donbass/
[7] https://www.anti-spiegel.ru/2022/victoria-nuland-beaufsichtigte-seit-2013-die-us-biowaffenprogramme-in-der-ukraine/
[8] https://www.anti-spiegel.ru/2022/russisches-militaer-veroeffentlicht-neue-informationen-ueber-das-us-biowaffenprogramm-in-der-ukraine/
[9]https://www.anti-spiegel.ru/2022/menschenversuche-in-us-labors-neue-informationen-ueber-das-us-biowaffenprogramm-in-der-ukraine/?doing_wp_cron=1649443559.7358539104461669921875
[10] https://www.wsws.org/de/articles/2022/03/10/nula-m10.html
[11] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26552008/
[12] http://english.whiov.cas.cn/International_Cooperation2016/Partnerships/
[13] https://www.nzz.ch/wissenschaft/neutraler-insider-oder-voreingenommener-mitwisser-ld.1647914
[14] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSt7ls2zIoY
[15] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIYWc4y2Zy0
[16] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_f%C3%BCr_Virologie_Wuhan
[17] https://www.who.int/about/funding/invest-in-who/investment-case-2.0/current-state
[18] https://bg.linkedin.com/posts/mike-smith-1409011_his-real-name-is-jordon-triston-walker-and-activity-7024807564370436096-CO0c
[19] https://www.reddit.com/r/unzensiert/comments/10p6to4/jordon_trishton_walker/
[20] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/republicans-press-hhs-fda-nih-for-answers-on-latest-pfizer-revelations-from-project-veritas/?utm_source=digest-freedom-2023-02-21&utm_medium=email
[21] https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/leaked-docs-reveal-government-ignored-evidence-about-covid-shots-cures-fauci-funded-research/
[22] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydSf57SRtcQ
English 
German 
Spanish
6 Responses
Dr. Weber joins in the daily scaremongering of the mainstream media without ever having dealt extensively with the basics of virology. It would be best to start again with John Franklin Enders and the "forgotten" control experiments. Thank you.
Gain Of Fiction... Dr. Sam Bailey hit the nail on the head with her latest video.
Instead of Project Veritas, perhaps Project Immanuel would be better!
I would like to draw your kind attention to the following situation.
Example:
A shoe manufacturer discovers (idea) a new shoe product that could satisfy a recognized need of fellow human beings. If the shoe manufacturer is convinced that there is sufficient demand for his product (presumed profit opportunity due to a speculated high product demand from people), he begins product development (e.g. special running shoe, because running is becoming increasingly popular and more and more recreational athletes are looking for high-quality running shoes in addition to professional athletes) and uses explicitly selected production resources that he considers suitable for the manufacture of his products in order to produce a high-quality running shoe.
The shoe manufacturer's marketing department is not concerned with the means of production used for the product to be advertised, but rather with the psychological means that could generate the best possible product advertising among hoped-for future customers and aligns the product advertising accordingly. In the end, customers decide through their voluntary demand whether the new product will find its way onto the market and generate profits for the entrepreneur or not. No matter how professional the advertising may have been and how much of the advertised product has been sold, if the product does not deliver what it promises or another market participant brings a better product to the market as a running shoe, the market participant has no chance of making lasting profits. If consumers even suffer physical damage as a result of consuming the product, the manufacturer is personally liable with his private assets for the damage suffered by the injured parties.
These are the mechanisms in the free market economy that are obvious to everyone and are logically understandable and used by all market participants. Even by entrepreneurs who recognize or even know that their products would never be in constant demand on the market by voluntary customers. Either because they are bad (counterfeiting, inferior quality, forced labor, etc.), or because they do not fulfill what was promised by the manufacturer, or because they even cause physical damage to the customers, which would open up additional (new and further) profit opportunities for the entrepreneur on the market via additional products (if necessary, intent, e.g. the use of the product in the market). Intent, e.g. the manufacture of medicines that knowingly do not cure, but instead produce chronic long-term illnesses or even knowingly or even accidentally cause additional illnesses that require additional long-term treatment with medication, to name just one of countless examples).
The situation that I would like to kindly point out is that we humans will always be exposed to people who will try to use unfair means to make a profit. Whether a political entrepreneur with election promises or awarding contracts or privileges to people if they are elected or even come to power. Whether a pharmaceutical entrepreneur, education entrepreneur, medical entrepreneur, clothing entrepreneur, food entrepreneur or whatever economic sector. We should all be asking ourselves how it could be possible to recognize charlatans, fraudsters and abusers as quickly as possible, as an ordinary person without having to acquire specialist knowledge in all areas of the economy, which is completely impossible and also changes over a lifetime.
The answer is basically intuitively known to most people and is logical and conclusive in itself:
Private property and personal responsibility!
If the private property of all citizens of a territorial area is clearly defined and firmly anchored in law and legally protected against any hostile access and seizure and if every citizen is responsible for his own personal actions and is held personally liable, if he causes demonstrable physical harm to fellow human beings, mindfulness and a sense of responsibility automatically increase (simple cost-benefit calculation of all economic subjects/that is, all people) and criminal energies automatically decrease because they become more and more costly (simple cost-benefit calculation)!
Why are coercion, violence, deception, hysteria, fears, aggression and powerlessness on the rise in our society and in all other societies?
Because neither in this nor in other countries do we see and know that our private property (human dignity!) is protected, but we are already helplessly and defenselessly at the mercy of the respective state or ruling regime and its power (through its executors in the legislative, judicial and executive branches and the public "service" from society, our fellow human beings!See, for example, the consequences in Germany of peaceful resistance against the ruling power in the event of non-payment of taxes and duties or if one does not take one's own children to state school or if one does not have one's own children vaccinated against measles/compulsory measles vaccination or does not renew the identity card, ignores the application for a building permit, etc.).
Self-determination presupposes personal power of disposal over private property, which begins with the exclusive right to one's own body qua birth and extends to all other goods acquired by peaceful means through the physical use of one's own body!
In my view, the right question is not who conducts which research, develops and markets which products where, but whether they are researched, developed and sold peacefully and without access to other people's property, or by means of deception, coercion and violence, and whether or not all our private property is and will be protected by law!
Under a state as we know it, there is no private property and no protection of private property, which every person can check independently in his own life as well as with his fellow human beings!
No freedom without private property.
With a system that can and may legitimately decide on the disposal of other people's private property and systematically and institutionally attack and access it arbitrarily on an ongoing basis, no one need be surprised at the conditions in this and other countries.
Public opinion carries and supports the narrative of the necessity of a state as we know it to this day. The mob rules and dominates, instead of a free market with billions of people (economic subjects) who peacefully and productively improve life for themselves and their fellow human beings through the division of labor, absolute respect for other people's property and personal responsibility.
THAT is our biggest problem!
In this context, the following linked article from "Spektrum der Wissenschaft" with the completely unsuspicious date of December 20, 2017 should also be of interest:
https://www.spektrum.de/news/usa-gibt-kontroverse-virenforschung-frei/1528035
Keyword monkeypox. There was something. Is there anything else coming? Something is definitely coming!
It's scary to magnify the danger of germs.
For me, it's a form of madness.
It is just as creepy to increase the danger of conflicts in order to sell your expensive armaments to the man/woman.
For me, this is just another form of the same greed-driven madness.
If I interpret the article above correctly, both forms of madness come together in Ukraine.
When Olaf Scholz visits Kiev and tries to sell wind turbines - as he did in India - three forms of madness come together.
——————————————————————-
Based on measurements in large wind farms and simulations, Harvard scientists led by researcher David Keith have published that the temperature in the USA would rise by 0.24 degrees if the USA were to produce all its electricity via wind energy (https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2018/10/large-scale-wind-power-has-its-down-side/). Now you have to realize that the population density in the USA is only one seventh of that in Germany. Consequently, we can only cover 1/7 of our electricity needs to achieve the same atmospheric effect. However, we cover around a quarter to a fifth of our electricity (120....130 TWh/a of 530 TWh/a) with wind energy.
The result can be clearly seen in the WELT report: "The weather is changing particularly drastically in Germany". The warming began to diverge from the global trend after the first wind farms were built in Europe. The effect shown in the diagram is around 0.4....0.5 degrees (see DWD diagram in the WELT report). At 0.24 degrees x 1/4 / (1/7) = 0.42 degrees, this corresponds pretty much exactly to this value. Who is surprised that politicians, scientists and the press/media close their eyes to such findings?
In Germany, we consume 2500 TWh/a or 2% of global energy consumption. We produce around 1/20 (=120...130 TWh/a) of this through wind turbines. Consequently, we produce around 0.1% or 1 per thousand of international energy consumption via wind energy in Germany. Does anyone seriously believe that this per thousand will reduce the temperature by 0.4 to 0.5 degrees in a finite period of time? We can wait a long time, even if you believe in the CO2 thesis at 100%. The latter has already been difficult since 2019, when one of the leading climate researchers admitted that the global climate simulations of science are not yet effective (see Spiegel report: "A new strategy" from 03/2019 and only a few months later in writing when I asked him that he had never thought about the effect of so-called "terrestrial stilling", i.e. the global wind reduction over land that has been observed for decades. And this wind reduction, similar to the draining of wetlands and soil sealing, causes a reduction in evaporation, the most important cooling effect of the earth's surface (see Trenberth diagram). In mathematical terms, the effect described could roughly correspond to the so-called radiative forcing that science attributes to CO2. The described effect of the interplay between wind and evaporation is already well documented (see the EU-sponsored display board in Frankfurt's Mainhafenpark: https://www.regionalpark-rheinmain.de/portfolio-item/klimaroute-flusswind/).
You can spin it however you like, but scientists, politicians and journalists are deliberately ignoring the negative effects of wind energy. The former are even not too shy to tell the Bundestag untruths during the debate. And that by a factor of 100 according to my estimate or a factor of 150 according to the Federal Environment Agency.
I am therefore quite sure that our politicians will sooner or later manage to export this madness to Ukraine. Greed will see to that.